PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

France · Question · Question écrite

14932

Question 14932 — pensions: general

openFrance· National Assembly· FR

Introduced

5 May 2026

Last action

Status

posée

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

5 May 2026

Summary

Ms. Colette Capdevielle draws the attention of the Minister of Labor and Solidarity to the situation of former beneficiaries of collective utility work (TUC). The law of April 14, 2023 allowed considerable progress by recognizing these periods in the calculation of retirement rights. However, the decrees of August 2023 classified them into “assimilated” and not “deemed contributory” quarters. Result: 70% of former TUCists are excluded of the early departure system for long careers. This situation seems all the more paradoxical given the fact that these beneficiaries started working at the ages of 16 to 21 to serve the general interest. Former TUCists perceive these decrees as an injustice, the law not prohibiting the consideration of these periods as contributory. The Government has also already adjusted the system for other cases such as family quarters. The MP is aware of the decision of the Council of State of August 26, 2025 which confirms that the Government is justified in not counting the quarters completed in TUC for the calculation of a “long career”. She also took note of the answers provided by the former Minister of Labor and Solidarity, Ms. Catherine Vautrin. Toutefois, she hopes that a more precise answer will be given to enlighten the former TUCists who are still at an impasse. She therefore takes the liberty of asking him if a different approach could be considered so that the TUCs are finally included in the “long career” system.

Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.