PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

France · Question · Question écrite

15599

Question 15599 — exams, competitions and diplomas

openFrance· National Assembly· FR

Introduced

2 June 2026

Last action

Status

posée

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

2 June 2026

Summary

Mr. Vincent Caure draws the attention of the Minister of Agriculture, Agri-Food and Food Sovereignty to the system of access to the veterinary profession for graduates from outside the EU (United Kingdom). The “knowledge test” provided for by article R. 241-13 of the rural and maritime fishing code is similar, in its terms, to a selective competition (failure rate of 80%). It contravenes the spirit of the exercise professional based on competence. The MP notes technical anomalies. Obsolescence of the test: the MCQ with negative points penalizes reflective clinical practice in favor of memory cramming; lack of transparency: unlike the American NAVLE, no detailed program (syllabus) or corrected annal is provided, placing candidates in total legal insecurity; disproportion of the jury: the oral test, requiring the recitation of the code of ethics, disconnects the evaluation of the veterinarian's actual surgical or diagnostic abilities. He asks him if the Government intends to establish automatic equivalence for courses started before 2021, in order to protect acquired rights; decentralize the exam and transform it into a single certificate test, based on a public and accessible syllabus; review the format of tests to ensure that they assess clinical discernment rather than literal memorization of national law.

Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.