Question 16294 — pensions: general

Summary

Mr. Antoine Vermorel-Marques questions the Minister of Labor and Solidarity on the consequences of the suspension of the pension reform on access to the parental bonus. The parental premium allows certain insured persons, mainly women who have benefited from quarters of increase for maternity, adoption or the education of children, to obtain an increase in their pension when they meet the conditions of the full rate before the legal age of departure. However, the suspension of the pension reform has lowered the legal retirement age for certain generations, notably policyholders born in 1964 and the first quarter of 1965. This development produces a paradoxical effect: these policyholders may find themselves deprived of the parental bonus, since their legal age is now below 63 years. This situation creates a difference in treatment that is difficult to understand. between women who have had comparable professional and family backgrounds. It can also lead to a lasting financial loss, which can reach up to 5% of the basic pension. He therefore asks whether the Government intends to correct this side effect so that women born in 1964 and the first quarter of 1965 are not penalized by the suspension of the pension reform. He also asks him what measures will be taken to ensure reliable information for the policyholders concerned, in particular from CARSAT and in the personal spaces of Retirement Insurance.

Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

1. 23 June 2026

   Question

   Source: DateQuestion

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

• Antoine Vermorel · auteur

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.