PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

France · Question · Question écrite

17079

Question 17079 — co-ownership

openFrance· National Assembly· FR

Introduced

21 July 2026

Last action

Status

posée

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

21 July 2026

Summary

Mr. Philippe Fait draws the attention of the Minister of Ecological Transition, Biodiversity and International Negotiations on Climate and Nature to the difficulties encountered by many co-owners wishing to install a heat pump in their home. France encourages the deployment of heat pumps as part of its building decarbonization policy, in particular through energy efficiency assistance schemes. energy renovation. However, many co-ownership regulations generally prohibit the installation of heat pumps or air conditioning systems, thus preventing certain co-owners from undertaking work to improve the energy performance of their home. If restrictions can be justified for reasons relating to compliance with town planning rules, heritage protection, integration architectural aspects of equipment or the prevention of noise pollution, these considerations appear difficult to reconcile with general prohibitions. Technological progress now makes it possible to offer equipment that is quieter and better integrated into its environment. In this context, he asks whether the Government plans to change the legal framework applicable to co-ownerships in order to limit the clauses a general ban on heat pumps by reconciling the objectives of ecological transition with the preservation of the living environment of co-owners.

Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.