Question 17108 — teaching

Summary

Ms. Julie Laernoes draws the attention of the Minister of National Education and Youth to the administrative blockages encountered by teachers wishing to participate in courses or projects organized by the Cooperative Institute of the Modern School (ICEM - Freinet pedagogy). The Cooperative Institute of the Modern School (ICEM - Freinet pedagogy), created in 1947 by Célestin Freinet, is a recognized educational movement, approved by the Ministry of National Education. This educational movement is based on the principles of Freinet pedagogy - cooperative and democratic organization of the class and school, communication, research and free expression activities, self and co-evaluation - and brings together public school teachers and educators. The ICEM offers educational tools, theoretical and practical works, classroom magazines and training at national, regional and local level and can also support teaching teams locally. These educational resources, some of which are online, are entirely designed, prepared and tested in classes by teachers and students themselves, which makes them original and effective. They are unanimously recognized and disseminated in numerous classes, allowing students to follow a section of individualized work and working independently. They are prepared with and by the children, on a voluntary basis in the personal time of modern school teachers and as part of projects organized during school time. These sites are subject to absence authorizations from the administration. However, the Cooperative Institute of the Modern School (ICEM - Freinet pedagogy) is still faced with an almost systematic blockage requests for authorization for internships and work sites submitted to the administration, at the local and departmental level. These requests for authorization of absence made by teachers of the Modern School Movement to participate in training or production courses are in fact systematically refused, often issued without reasons. Such recurring blocking in no way favors missions in which this educational movement is involved: a research and co-training collective yet fully recognized within the world of education, by the scientific community and by the ministry. There is thus a gap between the recognition and approval of this educational movement at the forefront of innovative educational practices and a reality on the ground in contradiction with ministerial prescriptions. She asks him like this what are the means that it intends to put in place in order to remove these administrative blockages to allow teachers to participate in these courses and workshops and thus support the teachers of this approved movement, whose research and work largely contribute to the renewal and modernization of teaching practices.

Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.