PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

France · Question · Question écrite

17192

Question 17192 — people with disabilities

openFrance· National Assembly· FR

Introduced

16 April 2024

Last action

Status

posée

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

16 April 2024

Summary

Ms. Blandine Brocard draws the attention of the Minister of Labor, Health and Solidarity to the drafting of administrative letters intended to inform people reaching the age of 62 and receiving the allowance for disabled adults (AAH) of the options available to them. If a person receiving AAH is unemployed at the age of 62, they are requested by the family allowance fund (CAF) and retirement insurance to exercise their retirement rights. She is warned that if she does not take this step, she will stop receiving AAH when she reaches 62 years of age. If she does so, she will continue to receive the AAH until her pension is liquidated. She can also refuse to retire but will also stop receiving AAH. This is not the case for a person carrying out a professional activity who has the possibility to continue said activity and to make a request for retirement liquidation under the conditions of common law, in particular regarding the retirement age. This person, continuing to work, can also continue to receive the AAH. However, the wording of letters from retirement insurance and the CAF makes the disabled worker think that he will stop receiving the AAH if he decides to continue his activity. She wishes that she studies the drafting of these letters so that the recipient is fully informed of their rights.

Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.