France · Question · Question écrite
22202
Question 22202 — land use planning
Introduced
7 June 2019
Last action
—
Status
posée
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
7 June 2019
Summary
Mr. Philippe Chassaing questions the Minister of Ecological and Inclusive Transition on the complexity of the “case by case” examination procedure imposed by the regional directorates of the environment, planning and housing (DREAL) prior to the establishment of poplars. Today, clearings subject to authorization under the forest code with a view to land reconversion covering a total surface area (even fragmented) of more than 0.5 hectare (ha) are subject to review on a case-by-case basis. The first afforestation of more than 0.5 ha is also affected by this obligation. Also, owners wishing to transform a meadow or cultivated land into a poplar grove must engage in a procedure that is both long and complex, consisting of completing an 11-page Cerfa form (for which the explanatory note itself contains 10 pages) and waiting for the investigation phases by the DREAL (5 weeks minimum) and final decision by prefectural decree. Moreover, the issuance of authorization from the State representative conditions the right to benefit from aid schemes linked to afforestation. At a time when poplar resources are insufficient to satisfy industrial demand, this procedure is proving dissuasive for foresters who plan to invest in the planting of poplars, provided that the surface area of the plots to be afforested rarely exceeds 1 ha. Consequently, raising the threshold from 0.5 ha to 10 ha - surface area from which the owner can request approval of a simple management plan, in which environmental aspects can be taken into account in a more specific way - would be likely to revive poplar plantation projects. Thus, and without ignoring the usefulness of case-by-case examinations, he asks it to examine the advisability of relaxing the procedure for plots of less than 10 ha, in order to support the populculture sector and economy.
Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
No documents linked.
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/15/questions/QANR5L15QE22202
- Open data entity: https://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/opendata/QANR5L15QE22202