PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

France · Question · Question écrite

6558

Question 6558 — waste

answeredFrance· National Assembly· FR

Introduced

13 May 2025

Last action

Status

répondue

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

24 June 2025

Summary

Mr. Christophe Barthès alerts the Minister of Ecological Transition, Biodiversity, Forests, Sea and Fisheries about extended producer responsibility (EPR) for construction companies. The “virtuous” nature of this system made possible by the AGEC law in reality only exists on paper and hundreds of thousands of construction companies in France pay for an almost non-existent service. Access to points of collection is restrictive and only concerns 20% of waste volumes. For the remaining 80%, direct or corporate collection is at the embryonic stage. The dysfunctions of building REP are therefore numerous. The eco-organizations which receive payment of this contribution are ecological only in name. They apply the increases to companies without explanation, within very short deadlines. The minister decreed in mid-March 2025 a moratorium on this system and is committed to an overhaul of it. This overhaul must not result in measures, which would lead to great disappointment for construction companies. We must certainly fight against illegal dumping, but without penalizing businesses. He asks her what she plans to do to overhaul the extended producer responsibility system; and if she's going to put in establishes a REP supervisory board, in order to make the voices of craftsmen and entrepreneurs heard.

Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.