France · Question · Question écrite
7554
Question 7554 — exams, competitions and diplomas
Introduced
17 June 2025
Last action
—
Status
posée
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
17 June 2025
Summary
Mr. Jean Laussucq draws the attention of the Minister of State, Minister of National Education, Higher Education and Research, to the measures aimed at limiting cheating during exams, in particular the potential use of mobile phone jammers in schools and universities. In a context of the trivialization of digital tools and the permanent connectivity of students, the fight against Fraud during examinations is becoming a major issue for the credibility and fairness of the education system. The meteoric rise of artificial intelligence, conversational applications and hidden means of digital communication has profoundly changed the conditions of surveillance and exam security. Currently, article L. 33-3-1 of the postal and electronic communications code strictly prohibits the use, the possession and installation of jamming devices except exceptions provided for specific needs such as public order, defense, national security or the public service of justice. This provision, although inspired by legitimate concerns regarding public freedoms and communications security, did not anticipate the technological changes taking place today. Many teachers of secondary school and university teachers report a worrying increase in cases of cheating, made possible by the use of digital tools or artificial intelligence during exams. The phenomenon is now massive, as evidenced by the unprecedented waves of disciplinary procedures initiated in several establishments following exam fraud involving generative artificial intelligence tools. In this context, the MP wishes to know if the Minister intends to clarify the ministry's position on the current application of the legislation relating to jammers and if a reflection is underway to adapt the legal framework to new technological challenges. He also questions him about alternative avenues that could be considered to fairly secure exams, such as the generalization of phone detectors. portable, the use of wave-proof areas or the creation of a strictly regulated exemption regime for certain sensitive examinations.
Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
No documents linked.
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/17/questions/QANR5L17QE7554
- Open data entity: https://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/opendata/QANR5L17QE7554