France · Question · Question écrite
7863
Question 7863 — pensions: general
Introduced
24 June 2025
Last action
—
Status
répondue
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
20 January 2026
Summary
Mr. Jonathan Gery questions the Minister of Labor, Health, Solidarity and Families on the recognition of quarters carried out within the framework of work of collective utility (TUC) and similar schemes, in connection with access to the early retirement scheme for long careers. While the regulatory texts taken in August 2023, as part of the pension reform, specify the validation conditions quarters for these schemes, it appears that the periods carried out under the TUC are only counted as assimilated quarters and not as quarters deemed to have been contributed. This distinction effectively excludes many former TUC beneficiaries from the long career system, preventing them from reaching the number of quarters of contributions required for early departure at full rate. This situation creates a profound injustice for people who have carried out real activity in the service of the general interest. It is all the more incomprehensible since, both in the parliamentary debates and in the reports annexed to the reform, the intention expressed was to have these quarters recognized as deemed to be paid contributions. This is particularly what the authors of the flash mission on the subject specified, as well as the general rapporteur of the PLFRSS 2023, indicating that it was “necessary for these periods to be “deemed to have been contributed” to give entitlement to the early departure scheme for long careers”. Consequently, he questions her about the measures she intends to take to correct this inequity. He asks whether a regulatory change is being considered to allow TUC quarters to be recognized as deemed to be contributed, like other periods of activity or compensation. already taken into account (compensated unemployment, maternity leave, military service, etc.).
Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
No documents linked.
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/17/questions/QANR5L17QE7863
- Open data entity: https://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/opendata/QANR5L17QE7863