PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

France · Question · Question écrite

8976

Question 8976 — housing

openFrance· National Assembly· FR

Introduced

5 May 2018

Last action

Status

posée

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

5 May 2018

Summary

Ms. Christine Hennion alerts the Minister of Territorial Cohesion to the situation of Samu Social in the Hauts-de-Seine department. The reduction in credits allocated to 115 for the year 2018 led to a tightening of emergency accommodation criteria. As a result, only the most vulnerable people (particularly disabled) and families with a child under 1 year old are allocated a hotel room in this department. Thus, at the end of the winter protection period, many families, sometimes large, with young children over one year old, find themselves on the street. Indeed, as some households have been benefiting from this “emergency” accommodation for several months or even several years, the renewal of their hotel care is no longer guaranteed. Secours Catholique 92 has identified around fifty families condemned to be on the street in the months to come. The prefecture puts the figure at 100 families and some estimates go up to 200. The dramatic situation of these people, specific to Hauts-de-Seine, requires rapid action. More than 4,000 beneficiaries of the emergency accommodation system in the department are today living in fear of finding themselves without a roof over their heads as of next week. She wants to know what that the Government intends to do to fulfill Emmanuel Macron's promise that no one will be on the streets anymore.

Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.