PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

France · Question · Question écrite

9106

Question 9106 — higher education

answeredFrance· National Assembly· FR

Introduced

20 June 2023

Last action

Status

répondue

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

13 February 2024

Summary

Mrs. Pascale Martin questions the Minister of Higher Education and Research about the failure to take into account the 13,000 secondary school teachers assigned to higher education (ESAS) and assimilated in the compensation scheme for teaching and research staff (RIPEC). Until the end of 2021, ESAS and similar benefited from a higher education bonus equal to that of teacher-researchers and teacher-researchers (EC). But Decree No. 2021-1895 of December 29, 2021 and the implementation of RIPEC put an end to this equity. However, these higher education teachers (ES) represent 40% of the teaching hours provided in higher education, with a course load twice that of ECs. Without them, the proper functioning of higher education establishments could not be ensured! For ES is a double punishment, since they are also excluded from the measures to “revalorize the teaching profession” put in place by the Ministry of National Education in April 2023. Faced with this injustice, ES are mobilizing, particularly within Collective 384, to demand, among other things, access to the same compensation plan as ECs, or to bonuses of equivalent amount. They are supported by the Assembly of directors of IUTs and by numerous higher education establishments. A large number of ES have decided to resign from part of their administrative and teaching tasks, which are not inherent to their status and are too poorly paid. Questioned by the collective as well as by several parliamentarians, the Minister responded that the bonuses of the ES have still been revalued and that the difference in compensation observed with the EC is justified by the latter's higher level of education, as well as by their research activities. However, there is no reason to prevent ES from accessing the C2 and C3 components of RIPEC, in order to receive identical remuneration for their administrative and educational missions which are similar to those of EC. She therefore asks him what justifies the exclusion of higher education teachers from the C2 and C3 components of the RIPEC and more broadly, what it intends to do in order to restore the equity of remuneration and bonuses granted to the different categories of teachers who ensure the proper functioning of the higher education system.

Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.