France · Question · Question écrite
9308
Question 9308 — waste
Introduced
27 June 2023
Last action
—
Status
posée
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
27 June 2023
Summary
Ms. Sabine Thillaye draws the attention of the Minister of Ecological Transition and Territorial Cohesion to the implementation of extended producer responsibility for building construction products and materials (REP PMCB), known as REP Bâtiment. The anti-waste law for a circular economy (AGEC) of February 10, 2020 notably provided for the establishment of an REP sector for building waste (a sector which, for reminder, alone represents 42 million tonnes of annual waste, the equivalent of the annual production of all French households). We therefore understand the importance that the establishment of this REP sector can have. However, it faces two major difficulties. First of all, there is a question of timing: the effective implementation of this sector, initially planned for January 1, 2022, has been postponed a first time on January 1, 2023, then a second time on May 1, 2023, due to significant delays. This means that for more than a month, this sector has officially been fully operational. However, in reality, this is not the case: the calls for tenders from eco-organizations are far from being completed and collection, in the territories, is generally not happening. And although the professionals concerned today carry out the eco-contribution provided for by the REP, this contribution, for the moment, does not actually correspond to anything. Added to this is a second point of attention, regarding the very way in which this sector was designed. In fact, the calls for tenders launched by eco-organizations aim to identify only two players per department. We are therefore facing (and the process is already visible on the ground) a situation of monopoly of large groups, to the detriment of small collection, sorting and processing companies, which are sources of value and employment in the territories. Furthermore, while the business model of these companies has until now been based on the recovery of waste, they will no longer have, with some exceptions, ownership of this waste. Their mission will therefore be limited to collection and transport, which (even beyond the question of ecological logic that there may be) having to multiply the kilometers in this way) will put their viability at risk. This is why it would like to know whether, without losing sight of the initial deadlines, which have already been significantly extended, it would not be appropriate to consult the players in this sector again, in order to ensure that the establishment of this REP sector is able to achieve the objectives that it had set itself.
Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
No documents linked.
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/16/questions/QANR5L16QE9308
- Open data entity: https://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/opendata/QANR5L16QE9308