Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · DE

Asylum

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

22 records in DE in 2004

All countriesSearch this topic

Records

Question· Schriftliche Frage16/11525open

Counting the Iraqi refugees already in Germany against the number of people to be admitted for Germany agreed as part of the European quota solution

Germany · German Bundestag · 1 January 2005

<span>Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> </span><span>Should the principle of counting Iraqi refugees already in the country also apply in Germany, and if so, how many refugees already here would be counted towards the total number of 2,500 Iraqi refugees that Germany wants to take in as part of the European quota solution?</span>

Question· Schriftliche Frage16/11955open

Cancellation of the recognition of the passport replacement papers of Palestinian refugees with German residence permits

Germany · German Bundestag · 1 January 2005

<span>Originaltext der Frage(n):<br /> <br /> </span><span>Seit wann werden Reisedokumente für palästinensische Flüchtlinge (Documents de Voyage pour les Réfugiés Palestiniens) bei der Einreise nach Deutschland für Inhaber eines deutschen Aufenthaltstitels nicht mehr als Passersatzpapiere anerkannt, und was sind die politischen bzw. rechtlichen Gründe für die Aufhebung der Anerkennung dieser Reisedokumente als Passersatzpapier?<br /> <br /> Wie wurden die betroffenen palästinensischen Flüchtlinge, die zuständigen Behörden (ZAST, Ausländerbehörden, Innenverwaltungen etc.) und die libanesische diplomatische Vertretung in Deutschland über die Aufhebung dieser Anerkennung der Passersatzpapiere informiert, und welche Möglichkeiten stehen den Betroffenen offen, an anerkannte Passersatzpapiere zu gelangen?</span> <span><br /> </span>

Question· Schriftliche Frage16/12247open

Implementation of the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees' voluntary commitments to the professional integration of immigrant academics, especially from the CIS countries

Germany · German Bundestag · 1 January 2005

<span>Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> </span><span>What measures has the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees (BAMF) already taken and what is it planning to do in order to fulfill its voluntary commitments set out on page 80 of the National Integration Plan (concept for the professional integration of immigrant academics and for the integration of immigrant doctors from the former Soviet Union to comply)?</span>

Question· Mündliche Frage16/12246open

Compatibility of the treatment of the heavily pregnant and underage Cameroonian A. M. at Frankfurt Airport by the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees with the EU admission directive for refugees

Germany · German Bundestag · 1 January 2005

<span>Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> </span><span>To what extent does the Federal Government see the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees (BAMF)'s handling of the heavily pregnant minor A. M. from Cameroon, who was held in the refugee accommodation at Frankfurt Airport until the day of delivery, although the youth welfare office ensured that the expectant minor mother was adequately cared for outside of the airport accommodation and the fact that the Federal Office set hearing dates for both the expected date of birth and the day on which the birth was due to be induced (www.fr-online.de), a violation of the requirements of the EU Reception Directive for dealing with particularly vulnerable or underage refugees as well as a violation of human dignity and a disregard for the special need for protection pregnant women traumatized by rape?</span>

Question· Schriftliche Frage16/12356open

Implementation of Article 15c of the EU Qualifications Directive 2004/83/EC in the internal application instructions and in the decisions of the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees when recognizing refugees

Germany · German Bundestag · 1 January 2005

<span>Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> </span><span>What specific changes are there or are planned in the internal application instructions of the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees on the application of Article 15c of Council Directive 2004/83/EC of April 29, 2004 (Qualification Directive) in light of the fact that in the answer to the small question from the DIE LINKE parliamentary group. legal opinion of the federal government (Bundestag printed matter 16/7426, answer to question 10) must be viewed as refuted in the sense of the questioners by decisions of the Federal Administrative Court (judgment 10 C 43.07 of June 24, 2008) and the European Court of Justice (Grand Chamber, judgment of February 17, 2009 in case C-465/07), and to what extent the Federal Office will do so on its own initiative in this context Decisions that have already been made that are not consistent with the Qualifications Directive are compatible, should be taken up again and amended?</span>

Question· Mündliche Frage16/12355open

Reasons given by the Federal Government Commissioner for Migration, Refugees and Integration for the request for victims with a migration background in the Winnenden shooting

Germany · German Bundestag · 1 January 2005

<span>Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> </span><span>What interests did the Federal Government Commissioner for Migration, Refugees and Integration, Dr. Maria Böhmer, only a few hours after the rampage in Winnenden became known and at a time when the final number of victims had not yet been determined, the responsible police authorities found out whether people with a migrant background had been targeted was?</span>

Question· Schriftliche Frage16/13061open

Italian court case against German citizens for taking in African refugees on board the ship Cape Anamour in 2004

Germany · German Bundestag · 1 January 2005

<span>Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> </span><span>In what way does the federal government support and look after the German citizens Stefan Schmidt and Elias Bierdel, who are on trial in Sicily/Italy for “facilitating illegal immigration”, who rescued 37 African refugees from distress at sea on June 20, 2004, took them on board the ship “CAP ANAMUR” and brought them to a Sicilian port have?<br /> <br /> How does the Federal Government assess the accusation of “facilitating illegal immigration” against the background that the defendants fulfilled their obligation under the Convention on the Law of the Sea of 1982 by rescuing those in distress and neither secretly smuggled those rescued into Italy nor provided any other support for illegal immigration?<br /> <br /> How does the Federal government is sure that the current procedure does not violate constitutional standards and that political influence on the part of the Italian government on the process can be ruled out?</span>

Question· Schriftliche Frage16/13332open

Federal funds allocated to local authorities as part of project funding from the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees in 2008 and the Federal Government's attitude to this fact from a budgetary perspective

Germany · German Bundestag · 1 January 2005

<span>Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> </span><span>How does the federal government, in particular the Federal Ministry of Finance, assess from a budgetary perspective the fact that, according to the 2008 project handbook of the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees, a large number of municipal providers have received funding from the project funding title (including the city of Braunschweig, the Eislingen city administration, the city Gifhorn), in view of the fact that municipal project sponsors are supported by federal funds, and to what extent were federal funds allocated to municipal sponsors as part of the BAMF's project funding in 2008?</span>

Question· Schriftliche Frage16/13332open

Ensuring flawless airport asylum procedures by the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees against the background of criticism from Pro Asyl

Germany · German Bundestag · 1 January 2005

<span>Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> </span><span>What conclusions does the federal government draw from the investigation “Hasty, unfair, inadequate” presented by PRO ASYL on May 11, 2009, in which blatant deficiencies in hearings and decisions by the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees in the airport asylum procedure are identified, with regard to the control of these decisions and a future guarantee of impeccable ones Proceedings by the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees?</span>

Question· Schriftliche Frage16/13831open

Civilians and soldiers killed and number of refugees since the beginning of the Iraq War as well as domestic political developments in Iraq since the beginning of this year

Germany · German Bundestag · 1 January 2005

<span>Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> </span><span>To the knowledge of the Federal Government, how many deaths among the civilian population and soldiers have been recorded so far since the USA and its allies invaded Iraq (please list by individual year)?<br /> <br /> How many Iraqis have fled the country since the outbreak of the war and how are the individual refugee contingents distributed? the respective target countries?<br /> <br /> How does the Federal Government assess the current domestic political developments and the situation of the civilian population in Iraq since the beginning of this year?</span>

Question· Schriftliche Frage16/13965open

Consequences of the non-participation of the UNHCR Athens office in asylum procedures in Greece, in particular with regard to the Dublin return practice to Greece

Germany · German Bundestag · 1 January 2005

<span>Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> </span><span>What consequences, especially with regard to the already controversial Dublin return to Greece practice, does the Federal Government draw from the fact that, according to a press release of July 17, 2009, the UNHCR Athens office will no longer take part in asylum procedures in Greece because, according to the Greek President's decree of June 30, 2009, the requirements for a fair and effective asylum procedure and effective legal protection are no longer available and EU law is being violated?</span>