Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Asylum

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

51 records in EU in 2018

All countriesUnited Kingdom · 12,687Ireland · 6,788Austria · 3,733Netherlands · 2,241United States · 2,034Germany · 1,645European Union · 1,412France · 895Belgium · 1Estonia · 1Search this topic

Records

Proposal· PCCELEX 52018PC0836open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of a Protocol to the Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Denmark on the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in Denmark or any other Member State of the European Union and 'Eurodac' for the comparison of fingerprints for the effective application of the Dublin Convention extending that agreement to law enforcement

European Union · European Commission · 14 December 2018

Proposal· PCCELEX 52018PC0835open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the conclusion of a Protocol to the Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Denmark on the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in Denmark or any other Member State of the European Union and 'Eurodac' for the comparison of fingerprints for the effective application of the Dublin Convention extending that agreement to law enforcement

European Union · European Commission · 14 December 2018

Proposal· PCCELEX 52018PC0827open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of a Protocol between the European Union, the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway to the Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Iceland or Norway regarding the access to Eurodac for law enforcement purposes

European Union · European Commission · 13 December 2018

Proposal· PCCELEX 52018PC0828open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the conclusion of a Protocol between the European Union, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland regarding the access to Eurodac for law enforcement purposes

European Union · European Commission · 13 December 2018

Proposal· PCCELEX 52018PC0831open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of a Protocol between the European Union, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland regarding the access to Eurodac for law enforcement purposes

European Union · European Commission · 13 December 2018

Proposal· PCCELEX 52018PC0826open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the conclusion of a Protocol between the European Union, the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway to the Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Iceland or Norway regarding the access to Eurodac for law enforcement purposes

European Union · European Commission · 13 December 2018

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0713decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 November 2018.#Ahmad Shah Ayubi v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Linz-Land.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2011/95/EU — Rules relating to the content of international protection — Refugee status — Article 29 — Social protection — Different treatment — Refuges with temporary right of residence.#Case C-713/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 November 2018

Question· QUESTION_WRITTENE-8-2018-005759answered

Refugee invasions

European Union · European Parliament · 14 November 2018

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0047decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 13 November 2018.#X and X v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag zittingsplaats Haarlem.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 — Regulation (EC) No 1560/2003 — Determination of the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection — Criteria and mechanisms for determination — Request to take charge of or take back an asylum seeker — Negative reply from the requested Member State — Re-examination request — Article 5(2) of Regulation No 1560/2003 — Time limit for replying — Expiry — Effects.#Joined Cases C-47/17 and C-48/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 November 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62015TJ0299decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 October 2018.#Nova Onlus Consorzio nazionale di cooperative sociali - Soc. coop. v European Commission.#Arbitration clause — Grant agreement concluded in the context of the pilot project seeking to establish a network of contacts and discussions between municipalities on experiences and best practices in respect of the resettlement and integration of refugees — No objective assessment of the outcome of the project — Proportionality — Repayment of the sums paid — Measures of inquiry — Counterclaim.#Case T-299/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 October 2018

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0662decided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 October 2018.#E. G. v Republic of Slovenia.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Asylum policy — Directive 2013/32/EU — Article 46(2) — Appeal against a decision refusing to grant refugee status but granting subsidiary protection status — Admissibility — Lack of a sufficient interest where the subsidiary protection status granted by a Member State offers the same rights and benefits as those offered by the refugee status under Union and national law — Relevance of the applicant’s particular circumstances for the purposes of examining whether the rights and benefits are identical.#Case C-662/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 October 2018

Report· CCCELEX 62017CC0444decided

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 17 October 2018.#Préfet des Pyrénées-Orientales v Abdelaziz Arib and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Border control, asylum and immigration — Regulation (EU) 2016/399 — Article 32 — Temporary reintroduction of border control, by a Member State, at its internal borders — Illegal entry of a third-country national — Equation of internal borders with external borders — Directive 2008/115/EC — Scope — Article 2(2)(a).#Case C-444/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 October 2018

Record· CJCELEX 62016CJ0652decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 October 2018.#Nigyar Rauf Kaza Ahmedbekova and Rauf Emin Ogla Ahmedbekov v Zamestnik-predsedatel na Darzhavna agentsia za bezhantsite.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common policy on asylum and subsidiary protection — Standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection — Directive 2011/95/EU — Articles 3, 4, 10 and 23 — Applications for international protection lodged separately by family members — Individual assessment — Taking into account threats in respect of a family member in carrying out the individual assessment of the application for international protection of another family member — More favourable standards capable of being retained or introduced by the Member States for the purpose of extending the refugee or subsidiary protection status of a beneficiary of international protection to family members — Assessment of the reasons for persecution — Involvement of an Azerbaijani national in bringing a complaint against her country before the European Court of Human Rights — Common procedural standards — Directive 2013/32/EU — Article 46 — Right to an effective remedy — Full and ex nunc examination — Reasons for persecution or evidence withheld from the determining authority but invoked in the course of an action against the decision taken by that authority.#Case C-652/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2018

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0056decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 October 2018.#Bahtiyar Fathi v Predsedatel na Darzhavna agentsia za bezhantsite.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Borders, asylum and immigration — Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 — Article 3 — Determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection made in one of the Member States by a third-country national — Examination of an application for international protection without an express decision on the determination of the Member State responsible for the examination — Directive 2011/95/EU — Articles 9 and 10 — Reasons for persecution based on religion — Evidence — Iranian legislation on apostasy — Directive 2013/32/EU — Article 46(3) — Effective remedy.#Case C-56/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2018

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0175decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 26 September 2018.#X v Belastingdienst/Toeslagen.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common policy on asylum and subsidiary protection — Directive 2005/85/EC — Article 39 — Directive 2008/115/EC — Article 13 — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 18, Article 19(2) and Article 47 — Right to an effective remedy — Principle of non-refoulement — Decision rejecting an application for asylum and imposing an obligation to return — National legislation providing for a second level of jurisdiction — Automatic suspensory effect limited to the action at first instance.#Case C-175/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 September 2018

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0180decided

Arrest van het Hof (Vierde kamer) van 26 september 2018.#X en Y tegen Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie.#Prejudiciële verwijzing – Gemeenschappelijk beleid inzake asiel en subsidiaire bescherming – Richtlijn 2013/32/EU – Artikel 46 – Richtlijn 2008/115/EG – Artikel 13 – Handvest van de grondrechten van de Europese Unie – Artikel 18, artikel 19, lid 2, en artikel 47 – Recht op een doeltreffende voorziening in rechte – Beginsel van non-refoulement – Besluit tot afwijzing van een verzoek om internationale bescherming en tot oplegging van een terugkeerverplichting – Nationale regeling die voorziet in rechtspraak in tweede aanleg – Schorsende werking van rechtswege die tot het beroep in eerste aanleg is beperkt.#Zaak C-180/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 September 2018

Question· QUESTION_WRITTENE-8-2018-004642answered

LGBT asylum seekers

European Union · European Parliament · 13 September 2018

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0369decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 13 September 2018.#Shajin Ahmed v Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Borders, asylum and immigration — Refugee status or subsidiary protection status — Directive 2011/95/EU — Article 17 — Exclusion from subsidiary protection status — Grounds — Conviction for a serious crime — Determination of seriousness on the basis of the penalty provided for under national law — Whether permissible — Need for an individual assessment.#Case C-369/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 September 2018

Report· CCCELEX 62017CC0297decided

Opinion of Advocate General Wathelet delivered on 25 July 2018.#Bashar Ibrahim and Others v Bundesrepublik Deutschland and Bundesrepublik Deutschland v Taus Magamadov.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection — Directive 2013/32/EU — Article 33(2)(a) — Rejection by the authorities of a Member State of an application for asylum as being inadmissible because of the prior granting of subsidiary protection in another Member State — Article 52 — Scope ratione temporis of that directive — Articles 4 and 18 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Systemic flaws in the asylum procedure in that other Member State — Systematic rejection of applications for asylum — Substantial risk of suffering inhuman or degrading treatment — Living conditions of those granted subsidiary protection in that other State.#Joined Cases C-297/17, C-318/17, C-319/17 and C-438/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 July 2018

Report· CCCELEX 62017CC0056decided

Opinion of Advocate General Mengozzi delivered on 25 July 2018.#Bahtiyar Fathi v Predsedatel na Darzhavna agentsia za bezhantsite.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Borders, asylum and immigration — Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 — Article 3 — Determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection made in one of the Member States by a third-country national — Examination of an application for international protection without an express decision on the determination of the Member State responsible for the examination — Directive 2011/95/EU — Articles 9 and 10 — Reasons for persecution based on religion — Evidence — Iranian legislation on apostasy — Directive 2013/32/EU — Article 46(3) — Effective remedy.#Case C-56/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 July 2018

Record· CJCELEX 62016CJ0585decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 25 July 2018.#Serin Alheto v Zamestnik-predsedatel na Darzhavna agentsia za bezhantsite.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common policy on asylum and subsidiary protection — Standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection — Directive 2011/95/EU — Article 12 — Exclusion from refugee status — Persons registered with the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) — Existence of a ‘first country of asylum’, for a refugee from Palestine, in the UNRWA area of operations — Common procedures for granting international protection — Directive 2013/32/EU — Article 46 — Right to an effective remedy — Full and ex nunc examination — Scope of the powers of the court of first instance — Examination by the courts of international protection needs — Examination of grounds of inadmissibility.#Case C-585/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 July 2018

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0404decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 25 July 2018.#A v Migrationsverket.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Förvaltningsrätten i Malmö – Migrationsdomstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Asylum policy — Directive 2013/32/EU — Article 31(8) and Article 32(2) — Manifestly unfounded application for international protection — Concept of safe country of origin — No national rules concerning that concept — Applicant’s representations considered to be reliable but insufficient having regard to the satisfactory protection offered by the applicant’s country of origin.#Case C-404/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 July 2018

Report· CCCELEX 62017CC0163decided

Opinion of Advocate General Wathelet delivered on 25 July 2018.#Abubacarr Jawo v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof Baden-Württemberg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Dublin system — Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 — Transfer of the asylum seeker to the Member State responsible for examining the application for international protection — Concept of ‘absconding’ — Modalities of extending the time limit for transfer — Article 4 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Substantial risk of inhuman or degrading treatment on completion of the asylum procedure — Living conditions of beneficiaries of international protection in that Member State.#Case C-163/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 July 2018

Page 1 of 2Next