Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Defence

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

701 records in EU

All countriesUnited States · 41,749Ireland · 23,760United Kingdom · 15,991Germany · 5,713France · 4,100Netherlands · 3,841Austria · 3,566European Union · 2,430Belgium · 5Search this topic

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0175_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 November 2022.#Harman International Industries, Inc. v AB SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Articles 34 and 36 TFEU – Free movement of goods – Intellectual property – EU trade mark – Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 15 – Exhaustion of the rights conferred by a trade mark – Placing on the market within the European Economic Area (EEA) – Consent of the proprietor of the trade mark – Place of first marketing of products by the proprietor of the trade mark or with its consent – Proof – Directive 2004/48/EC – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Effective judicial protection – Operative part of judicial decisions not identifying the products covered – Difficulties in implementation – Restricted scope of action before the competent court for enforcement – Fair trial – Rights of the defence – Principle of the equality of arms.#Case C-175/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 November 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0175decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 November 2022.#Harman International Industries, Inc. v AB SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Articles 34 and 36 TFEU – Free movement of goods – Intellectual property – EU trade mark – Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 15 – Exhaustion of the rights conferred by a trade mark – Placing on the market within the European Economic Area (EEA) – Consent of the proprietor of the trade mark – Place of first marketing of products by the proprietor of the trade mark or with its consent – Proof – Directive 2004/48/EC – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Effective judicial protection – Operative part of judicial decisions not identifying the products covered – Difficulties in implementation – Restricted scope of action before the competent court for enforcement – Fair trial – Rights of the defence – Principle of the equality of arms.#Case C-175/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 November 2022

Report· XGCELEX 52022XG1115(10)open

The following information is brought to the attention of - ABDOLLAHI Hamed, AL-NASSER Abdelkarim Hussein Mohamed, AL-YACOUB Ibrahim Salih Mohammed, ARBABSIAR Manssor, ASSADI Assadollah, BOUYERI Mohammed, EL HAJJ Hassan Hassan, AL-DIN Izz Hasan, MELIAD Farah, MOHAMMED Khalid Sheikh, SHAHLAI Abdul Reza, SHAKURI Ali Gholam, Al-Aqsa Martyrs’ Brigade, Communist Party of the Philippines’, including ‘New People’s Army’ – ‘NPA’, Hizballah Military Wing, Ejército de Liberación Nacional (‘National Liberation Army’), Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine – ‘PFLP’, Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine – General Command, Sendero Luminoso – ‘SL’ (‘Shining Path’), and Teyrbazen Azadiya Kurdistan’ – ‘TAK’ persons and groups included on the list of persons, groups and entities subject to Articles 2, 3 and 4 of Council Common Position 2001/931/CFSP on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism and to Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism(see Annexes to Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/1241 and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1230) 2022/C 433/16

European Union · Council of the European Union · 15 November 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0203_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 November 2022.#Criminal proceedings against DELTA STROY 2003.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2005/212/JHA – Applicability – Imposition of a financial penalty on a legal person for non-payment of tax debts – Concept of ‘confiscation’ – Articles 48, 49 and 52 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Penalties of a criminal nature – Principles of the presumption of innocence and the legality and proportionality of criminal offences and penalties – Rights of the defence – Imposition of a criminal penalty on a legal person for an offence committed by the representative of that legal person – Parallel criminal proceedings against that representative that have not been concluded – Proportionality.#Case C-203/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 November 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0667_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 9 November 2022 (Extracts).#Ferriere Nord SpA v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for concrete reinforcing bars – Decision finding an infringement of Article 65 CS, after expiry of the ECSC Treaty, on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Price fixing – Limiting and controlling output and sales – Decision taken following the annulment of earlier decisions – New hearing held in the presence of the competition authorities of the Member States – Rights of the defence – Principle of sound administration – Reasonable time – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality – Ne bis in idem principle – Plea of illegality – Evidence of involvement in the cartel – Aggravating circumstances – Repeated infringement – Mitigating circumstances – Equal treatment – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-667/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 November 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0657_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 9 November 2022 (Extracts).#Feralpi Holding SpA v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for concrete reinforcing bars – Decision finding an infringement of Article 65 CS, after expiry of the ECSC Treaty, on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Price fixing – Limiting and controlling output and sales – Decision taken following the annulment of earlier decisions – New hearing held in the presence of the competition authorities of the Member States – Rights of the defence – Principle of sound administration – Reasonable time – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality – Ne bis in idem principle – Plea of illegality – Single, complex and continuous infringement – Evidence of involvement in the cartel – Public distancing – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-657/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 November 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0655_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 9 November 2022.#Ferriera Valsabbia SpA and Valsabbia Investimenti SpA v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for concrete reinforcing bars – Decision finding an infringement of Article 65 CS after the expiry of the ECSC Treaty on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Fixing of prices – Limiting and controlling output and sales – Decision adopted following the annulment of earlier decisions – Holding of a new hearing attended by the competition authorities of the Member States – Rights of the defence – Principle of sound administration – Reasonable time – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-655/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 November 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0246_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 9 November 2022.#Kingdom of Cambodia and Cambodia Rice Federation (CRF) v European Commission.#Safeguard measures – Rice market – Imports of Indica rice originating in Cambodia and Myanmar/Burma – Regulation (EU) No 978/2012 – Concept of ‘Union producers’ – Concept of ‘like or directly competing products’ – Serious difficulties – Rights of the defence – Essential facts and considerations – Manifest errors of assessment.#Case T-246/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 November 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0657decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 9 November 2022 (Extracts).#Feralpi Holding SpA v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for concrete reinforcing bars – Decision finding an infringement of Article 65 CS, after expiry of the ECSC Treaty, on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Price fixing – Limiting and controlling output and sales – Decision taken following the annulment of earlier decisions – New hearing held in the presence of the competition authorities of the Member States – Rights of the defence – Principle of sound administration – Reasonable time – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality – Ne bis in idem principle – Plea of illegality – Single, complex and continuous infringement – Evidence of involvement in the cartel – Public distancing – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-657/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 November 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0656decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 9 November 2022.#Alfa Acciai SpA v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for reinforcing bars – Decision finding an infringement of Article 65 CS, after the expiry of the ECSC Treaty on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Price fixing – Limiting and controlling output and sales – Decision adopted following the annulment of earlier decisions – New hearing in the presence of the competition authorities of the Member States – Rights of the defence – Principle of sound administration – Reasonable time – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-656/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 November 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0667decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 9 November 2022 (Extracts).#Ferriere Nord SpA v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for concrete reinforcing bars – Decision finding an infringement of Article 65 CS, after expiry of the ECSC Treaty, on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Price fixing – Limiting and controlling output and sales – Decision taken following the annulment of earlier decisions – New hearing held in the presence of the competition authorities of the Member States – Rights of the defence – Principle of sound administration – Reasonable time – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality – Ne bis in idem principle – Plea of illegality – Evidence of involvement in the cartel – Aggravating circumstances – Repeated infringement – Mitigating circumstances – Equal treatment – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-667/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 November 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0246decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 9 November 2022.#Kingdom of Cambodia and Cambodia Rice Federation (CRF) v European Commission.#Safeguard measures – Rice market – Imports of Indica rice originating in Cambodia and Myanmar/Burma – Regulation (EU) No 978/2012 – Concept of ‘Union producers’ – Concept of ‘like or directly competing products’ – Serious difficulties – Rights of the defence – Essential facts and considerations – Manifest errors of assessment.#Case T-246/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 November 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0656_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 9 November 2022.#Alfa Acciai SpA v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for reinforcing bars – Decision finding an infringement of Article 65 CS, after the expiry of the ECSC Treaty on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Price fixing – Limiting and controlling output and sales – Decision adopted following the annulment of earlier decisions – New hearing in the presence of the competition authorities of the Member States – Rights of the defence – Principle of sound administration – Reasonable time – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-656/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 November 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0655decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 9 November 2022.#Ferriera Valsabbia SpA and Valsabbia Investimenti SpA v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for concrete reinforcing bars – Decision finding an infringement of Article 65 CS after the expiry of the ECSC Treaty on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Fixing of prices – Limiting and controlling output and sales – Decision adopted following the annulment of earlier decisions – Holding of a new hearing attended by the competition authorities of the Member States – Rights of the defence – Principle of sound administration – Reasonable time – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-655/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 November 2022

Report· CCCELEX 62021CC0515decided

Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 27 October 2022.#LU and PH.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Surrender procedure between the Member States – Conditions for execution – Grounds for optional non-execution – Article 4a(1) – Warrant issued for the purpose of executing a custodial sentence – Concept of ‘trial resulting in the decision’ – Scope – First conviction, with a suspension – Second conviction – Absence of the person concerned at the trial – Revocation of the suspension – Rights of the defence – Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms – Article 6 – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 47 and 48 – Infringement – Consequences.#Joined Cases C-514/21 and C-515/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 October 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0298_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 26 October 2022.#KD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – 2019 Appraisal exercise – Appraisal report – Pre-litigation procedure – Admissibility – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Duty of care – Liability – Non-material damage.#Case T-298/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 October 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0500_INFdecided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 September 2022.#Health Information Management (HIM) v European Commission.#Appeal – Arbitration clause – Grant agreements concluded under the Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) Policy Support Programme – Audit report – Debit notes issued by the European Commission for the recovery of certain sums – Action for annulment – Investigation by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) – Counterclaim – Full repayment of the grants concerned – Rights of the defence – Principle of sound administration – Impartiality – Principle of proportionality – Obligation to state reasons.#Case C-500/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 September 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0500decided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 September 2022.#Health Information Management (HIM) v European Commission.#Appeal – Arbitration clause – Grant agreements concluded under the Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) Policy Support Programme – Audit report – Debit notes issued by the European Commission for the recovery of certain sums – Action for annulment – Investigation by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) – Counterclaim – Full repayment of the grants concerned – Rights of the defence – Principle of sound administration – Impartiality – Principle of proportionality – Obligation to state reasons.#Case C-500/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 September 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0604_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 September 2022.#Google LLC and Alphabet, Inc. v European Commission.#Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Smart mobile devices – Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement – Concepts of multi-sided platform and market (‘ecosystem’) – Operating system (Google Android) – App store (Play Store) – Search and browser applications (Google Search and Chrome) – Agreements with device manufacturers and mobile network operators – Single and continuous infringement – Concepts of overall plan and conduct implemented in the context of the same infringement (product bundles, exclusivity payments and anti-fragmentation obligations) – Exclusionary effects – Rights of the defence – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-604/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 September 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0604decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 September 2022.#Google LLC and Alphabet, Inc. v European Commission.#Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Smart mobile devices – Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement – Concepts of multi-sided platform and market (‘ecosystem’) – Operating system (Google Android) – App store (Play Store) – Search and browser applications (Google Search and Chrome) – Agreements with device manufacturers and mobile network operators – Single and continuous infringement – Concepts of overall plan and conduct implemented in the context of the same infringement (product bundles, exclusivity payments and anti-fragmentation obligations) – Exclusionary effects – Rights of the defence – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-604/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 September 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0391_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 7 September 2022.#Proceedings brought by Boriss Cilevičs and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 49 TFEU – Freedom of establishment – Restriction – Justification – The organisation of education systems – Institutions of higher education – Obligation to provide courses of study in the official language of the Member State concerned – Article 4(2) TEU – National identity of a Member State – Defence and promotion of the official language of a Member State – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-391/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 September 2022

PreviousPage 14 of 15Next