Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Defence

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

167 records in EU in 2024

All countriesUnited States · 41,749Ireland · 23,760United Kingdom · 15,991Germany · 5,712France · 4,098Netherlands · 3,840Austria · 3,566European Union · 2,430Belgium · 5Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0762_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 21 February 2024.#Sinopec Chongqing SVW Chemical Co. Ltd and Others v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of certain polyvinyl alcohols originating in China – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1336 – Calculation of the normal value – Significant distortions in the exporting country – Article 2(6a) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – WTO law – Principle of consistent interpretation – Adjustments – Non-refundable VAT – Functions similar to those of an agent acting on a commission basis – Fair comparison of the export price and the normal value – Burden of proof – Article 2(10)(b) and (i) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Non-cooperation – Facts available – Article 18 of Regulation 2016/1036 – Double application – Punitive application – Different production processes – Price undercutting – Market segments – Product control number method – Article 3(2) and (3) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Rights of the defence – Confidential treatment – Articles 19 and 20 of Regulation 2016/1036.#Case T-762/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 February 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0762decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 21 February 2024.#Sinopec Chongqing SVW Chemical Co. Ltd and Others v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of certain polyvinyl alcohols originating in China – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1336 – Calculation of the normal value – Significant distortions in the exporting country – Article 2(6a) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – WTO law – Principle of consistent interpretation – Adjustments – Non-refundable VAT – Functions similar to those of an agent acting on a commission basis – Fair comparison of the export price and the normal value – Burden of proof – Article 2(10)(b) and (i) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Non-cooperation – Facts available – Article 18 of Regulation 2016/1036 – Double application – Punitive application – Different production processes – Price undercutting – Market segments – Product control number method – Article 3(2) and (3) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Rights of the defence – Confidential treatment – Articles 19 and 20 of Regulation 2016/1036.#Case T-762/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 February 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0763decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 21 February 2024 (Extracts).#Inner Mongolia Shuangxin Environment-Friendly Material Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of certain polyvinyl alcohols originating in China – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1336 – Calculation of the normal value – Significant distortions in the exporting country – Article 2(6a) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – WTO law – Principle of consistent interpretation – Choice of appropriate representative country – Readily available data – Non-cooperation – Definition of ‘necessary information’ – Article 18 of Regulation 2016/1036 – Price undercutting – Market segments – Product control number method – Article 3(2) and (3) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Rights of the defence – Confidential treatment – Articles 19 and 20 of Regulation 2016/1036.#Case T-763/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 February 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0763_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 21 February 2024 (Extracts).#Inner Mongolia Shuangxin Environment-Friendly Material Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of certain polyvinyl alcohols originating in China – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1336 – Calculation of the normal value – Significant distortions in the exporting country – Article 2(6a) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – WTO law – Principle of consistent interpretation – Choice of appropriate representative country – Readily available data – Non-cooperation – Definition of ‘necessary information’ – Article 18 of Regulation 2016/1036 – Price undercutting – Market segments – Product control number method – Article 3(2) and (3) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Rights of the defence – Confidential treatment – Articles 19 and 20 of Regulation 2016/1036.#Case T-763/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 February 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0764decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 21 February 2024.#Anhui Wanwei Updated High-Tech Material Industry Co. Ltd and Inner Mongolia Mengwei Technology Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of certain polyvinyl alcohols originating in China – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1336 – Calculation of the normal value – Significant distortions in the exporting country – Article 2(6a) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – WTO law – Principle of consistent interpretation – Price undercutting – Market segments – Product control number method – Article 3(2) and (3) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Rights of the defence – Confidential treatment – Articles 19 and 20 of Regulation 2016/1036.#Case T-764/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 February 2024

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0514_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 February 2024.#Tirrenia di navigazione SpA v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – State aid – Maritime transport – Service of general economic interest – Decision declaring the aid unlawful – Decision declaring the aid compatible in part and incompatible in part with the internal market and ordering that it be recovered – Rescue aid – Compatibility with the internal market – Six month time limit – Extension – Obligation to submit a restructuring or liquidation plan – Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty – Tax exemption – Advantage – Adverse effect on trade between Member States – Adverse effect on competition – Excessive length of the procedure – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Principle of good administration – Principle of proportionality – Rights of the defence – General Court’s obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Freedom to conduct a business – Right to property – Unjust enrichment – Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Submission of an item of evidence out of time.#Case C-514/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 February 2024

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0514decided

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 February 2024.#Tirrenia di navigazione SpA v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – State aid – Maritime transport – Service of general economic interest – Decision declaring the aid unlawful – Decision declaring the aid compatible in part and incompatible in part with the internal market and ordering that it be recovered – Rescue aid – Compatibility with the internal market – Six month time limit – Extension – Obligation to submit a restructuring or liquidation plan – Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty – Tax exemption – Advantage – Adverse effect on trade between Member States – Adverse effect on competition – Excessive length of the procedure – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Principle of good administration – Principle of proportionality – Rights of the defence – General Court’s obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Freedom to conduct a business – Right to property – Unjust enrichment – Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Submission of an item of evidence out of time.#Case C-514/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 February 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0237_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 7 February 2024.#Alisher Usmanov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Meaning of ‘supporting actions or policies which undermine or threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine’ – Article 2(1)(a) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Rights of the defence – Right to property and freedom to conduct a business – Freedom of movement.#Case T-237/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 February 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0237decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 7 February 2024.#Alisher Usmanov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Meaning of ‘supporting actions or policies which undermine or threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine’ – Article 2(1)(a) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Rights of the defence – Right to property and freedom to conduct a business – Freedom of movement.#Case T-237/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 February 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0389_INFdecided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 January 2024.#GC and Others v Croce Rossa Italiana and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Scope of the obligation on national courts or tribunals of last instance to make a reference for a preliminary ruling – Exceptions to that obligation – Criteria – Situations in which the correct interpretation of EU law is so obvious as to leave no scope for any reasonable doubt – Condition related to the national court or tribunal of last instance being convinced that the matter would be equally obvious to the other courts or tribunals of last instance of the Member States and to the Court of Justice – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clauses 2 and 3 – Concept of ‘fixed-term worker’ – Members of the military corps of the Italian Red Cross – Clause 5 – Measures seeking to prevent and, where relevant, punish abuse arising from the use of successive fixed-term employment contracts or relationships – Conversion of the status of ‘fixed-term workers’ into that of ‘permanent workers’ – Clause 4 – Principle of non-discrimination.#Case C-389/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 January 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0389decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 January 2024.#GC and Others v Croce Rossa Italiana and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Scope of the obligation on national courts or tribunals of last instance to make a reference for a preliminary ruling – Exceptions to that obligation – Criteria – Situations in which the correct interpretation of EU law is so obvious as to leave no scope for any reasonable doubt – Condition related to the national court or tribunal of last instance being convinced that the matter would be equally obvious to the other courts or tribunals of last instance of the Member States and to the Court of Justice – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clauses 2 and 3 – Concept of ‘fixed-term worker’ – Members of the military corps of the Italian Red Cross – Clause 5 – Measures seeking to prevent and, where relevant, punish abuse arising from the use of successive fixed-term employment contracts or relationships – Conversion of the status of ‘fixed-term workers’ into that of ‘permanent workers’ – Clause 4 – Principle of non-discrimination.#Case C-389/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 January 2024

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0278_SUMdecided

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 January 2024.#M.M. v Ministero della Difesa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 5 – Fixed-term employment contracts in the public sector – Successive contracts – Prohibition on converting fixed-term contracts to open-ended contracts – Teaching non-military subjects in military schools.#Case C-278/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 January 2024

PreviousPage 4 of 4