Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Defence

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

51 records in EU in 2022

All countriesUnited States · 41,745Ireland · 23,760United Kingdom · 15,991Germany · 5,706France · 4,098Netherlands · 3,840Austria · 3,566European Union · 2,430Belgium · 5Search this topic

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0246decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 December 2022.#European Parliament v Giulia Moi.#Appeal – Law governing the institutions – Member of the European Parliament – Principle of ne ultra petita – Subject matter of the dispute – Rights of the defence – Article 232 TFEU – Operating arrangements of the Parliament – Sixth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Cross-appeal.#Case C-246/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 December 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0246_INFdecided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 December 2022.#European Parliament v Giulia Moi.#Appeal – Law governing the institutions – Member of the European Parliament – Principle of ne ultra petita – Subject matter of the dispute – Rights of the defence – Article 232 TFEU – Operating arrangements of the Parliament – Sixth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Cross-appeal.#Case C-246/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 December 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0242decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#Artem Viktorovych Pshonka v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-242/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 December 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0242_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#Artem Viktorovych Pshonka v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-242/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 December 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0243decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#Viktor Pavlovych Pshonka v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-243/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 December 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0243_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#Viktor Pavlovych Pshonka v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-243/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 December 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0143_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 December 2022.#PT Pelita Agung Agrindustri and PT Permata Hijau Palm Oleo v European Commission.#Subsidies – Imports of biodiesel originating in Indonesia – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2092 – Definitive countervailing duty – Article 8(1) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 – Price undercutting – Price pressure – Article 8(5) of Regulation 2016/1037 – Causal link – Article 3(1)(a)(iv) and (2) of Regulation 2016/1037 – Action consisting in ‘entrusting’ or ‘directing’ a private body to carry out a function constituting a financial contribution – Less than adequate remuneration – Income or price support – Article 3(2) and Article 6(d) of Regulation 2016/1037 – Benefit – Article 3(1)(a)(i) and (2) of Regulation 2016/1037 – Direct transfer of funds – Article 7 of Regulation 2016/1037 – Calculation of the amount of the benefit – Article 8(1) and (8) of Regulation 2016/1037 – Threat of material injury – Rights of the defence.#Case T-143/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 December 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62014TJ0586(02)_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 14 December 2022.#Xinyi PV Products (Anhui) Holdings Ltd v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of solar glass originating in China – Article 2(8) to (10) and Articles 19 and 20 of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (now Article 2(8) to (10) and Articles 19 and 20 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036) – Right to access confidential documents – Manifest error of assessment – Rights of the defence.#Case T-586/14 RENV II.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 December 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62014TJ0586(02)decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 14 December 2022.#Xinyi PV Products (Anhui) Holdings Ltd v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of solar glass originating in China – Article 2(8) to (10) and Articles 19 and 20 of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (now Article 2(8) to (10) and Articles 19 and 20 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036) – Right to access confidential documents – Manifest error of assessment – Rights of the defence.#Case T-586/14 RENV II.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 December 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0138decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 December 2022.#PT Ciliandra Perkasa v European Commission.#Subsidies – Imports of biodiesel originating in Indonesia – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2092 – Definitive countervailing duty – Article 8(1) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 – Price undercutting – Price pressure – Article 8(5) of Regulation 2016/1037 – Causal link – Article 3(2) and Article 6(d) of Regulation 2016/1037 – Benefit – Article 3(1)(a)(i) and (2) of Regulation 2016/1037 – Direct transfer of funds – Article 7 of Regulation 2016/1037 – Calculation of the amount of the benefit – Article 8(1) and (8) of Regulation 2016/1037 – Threat of material injury – Rights of the defence.#Case T-138/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 December 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0182decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 14 December 2022.#Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures imposed on the PKK with a view to combating terrorism – Freezing of funds – Common Position 2001/931/CFSP – Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 – Applicability to situations of armed conflict – Terrorist group – Factual basis of the decisions to freeze funds – Decision taken by a competent authority – Authority of a third State – Review – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality – Rights of the defence – Right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-182/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 December 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0138_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 December 2022.#PT Ciliandra Perkasa v European Commission.#Subsidies – Imports of biodiesel originating in Indonesia – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2092 – Definitive countervailing duty – Article 8(1) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 – Price undercutting – Price pressure – Article 8(5) of Regulation 2016/1037 – Causal link – Article 3(2) and Article 6(d) of Regulation 2016/1037 – Benefit – Article 3(1)(a)(i) and (2) of Regulation 2016/1037 – Direct transfer of funds – Article 7 of Regulation 2016/1037 – Calculation of the amount of the benefit – Article 8(1) and (8) of Regulation 2016/1037 – Threat of material injury – Rights of the defence.#Case T-138/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 December 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0143decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 December 2022.#PT Pelita Agung Agrindustri and PT Permata Hijau Palm Oleo v European Commission.#Subsidies – Imports of biodiesel originating in Indonesia – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2092 – Definitive countervailing duty – Article 8(1) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 – Price undercutting – Price pressure – Article 8(5) of Regulation 2016/1037 – Causal link – Article 3(1)(a)(iv) and (2) of Regulation 2016/1037 – Action consisting in ‘entrusting’ or ‘directing’ a private body to carry out a function constituting a financial contribution – Less than adequate remuneration – Income or price support – Article 3(2) and Article 6(d) of Regulation 2016/1037 – Benefit – Article 3(1)(a)(i) and (2) of Regulation 2016/1037 – Direct transfer of funds – Article 7 of Regulation 2016/1037 – Calculation of the amount of the benefit – Article 8(1) and (8) of Regulation 2016/1037 – Threat of material injury – Rights of the defence.#Case T-143/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 December 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0182_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 14 December 2022.#Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures imposed on the PKK with a view to combating terrorism – Freezing of funds – Common Position 2001/931/CFSP – Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 – Applicability to situations of armed conflict – Terrorist group – Factual basis of the decisions to freeze funds – Decision taken by a competent authority – Authority of a third State – Review – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality – Rights of the defence – Right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-182/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 December 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0180_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 December 2022.#VS v Inspektor v Inspektorata kam Visshia sadeben savet.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Articles 2, 4 and 6 – Applicability of Regulation 2016/679 – Concept of ‘legitimate interest’ – Concept of ‘task carried out in the public interest or in the exercise of official authority’ – Directive (EU) 2016/680 – Articles 1, 3, 4, 6 and 9 – Lawfulness of the processing of personal data collected in the course of a criminal investigation – Subsequent processing of data relating to a presumed victim of a criminal offence for the purpose of making a formal accusation in respect of him or her – Concept of purpose ‘other than that for which the personal data are collected’ – Data used by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purposes of its defence in an action for damages against the State.#Case C-180/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 December 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0348_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 8 December 2022.#Criminal proceedings against HYA and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive (EU) 2016/343 – Strengthening of certain aspects of the presumption of innocence and of the right to be present at the trial in criminal proceedings – Article 8(1) – Right of an accused person to be present at the trial – Second paragraph of Article 47 and Article 48(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to a fair trial and rights of the defence – Examination of witnesses for the prosecution in the absence of the accused person and his or her lawyer at the pre-trial stage of the criminal proceedings – Impossibility of examining witnesses for the prosecution during the judicial stage of those proceedings – National legislation allowing a criminal court to base its decision on the prior testimony of those witnesses.#Case C-348/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 December 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0348decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 8 December 2022.#Criminal proceedings against HYA and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive (EU) 2016/343 – Strengthening of certain aspects of the presumption of innocence and of the right to be present at the trial in criminal proceedings – Article 8(1) – Right of an accused person to be present at the trial – Second paragraph of Article 47 and Article 48(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to a fair trial and rights of the defence – Examination of witnesses for the prosecution in the absence of the accused person and his or her lawyer at the pre-trial stage of the criminal proceedings – Impossibility of examining witnesses for the prosecution during the judicial stage of those proceedings – National legislation allowing a criminal court to base its decision on the prior testimony of those witnesses.#Case C-348/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 December 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0180decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 December 2022.#VS v Inspektor v Inspektorata kam Visshia sadeben savet.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad - Blagoevgrad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Articles 2, 4 and 6 – Applicability of Regulation 2016/679 – Concept of ‘legitimate interest’ – Concept of ‘task carried out in the public interest or in the exercise of official authority’ – Directive (EU) 2016/680 – Articles 1, 3, 4, 6 and 9 – Lawfulness of the processing of personal data collected in the course of a criminal investigation – Subsequent processing of data relating to a presumed victim of a criminal offence for the purpose of making a formal accusation in respect of him or her – Concept of purpose ‘other than that for which the personal data are collected’ – Data used by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purposes of its defence in an action for damages against the State.#Case C-180/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 December 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0301_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 7 December 2022.#PNB Banka AS v European Central Bank.#Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Article 6(5)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Need for the ECB’s direct supervision of a less significant credit institution – Request by the national competent authority – Article 68(5) of Regulation (EU) No 468/2014 – ECB decision classifying PNB Banka as a significant entity subject to its direct prudential supervision – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality – Rights of the defence – Access to the administrative file – Report laid down in Article 68(3) of Regulation No 468/2014 – Article 106 of the Rules of Procedure – Request for a hearing lacking a statement of reasons.#Case T-301/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 December 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0301decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 7 December 2022.#PNB Banka AS v European Central Bank.#Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Article 6(5)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Need for the ECB’s direct supervision of a less significant credit institution – Request by the national competent authority – Article 68(5) of Regulation (EU) No 468/2014 – ECB decision classifying PNB Banka as a significant entity subject to its direct prudential supervision – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality – Rights of the defence – Access to the administrative file – Report laid down in Article 68(3) of Regulation No 468/2014 – Article 106 of the Rules of Procedure – Request for a hearing lacking a statement of reasons.#Case T-301/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 December 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62014TJ0316(01)_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 30 November 2022.#Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures against the PKK with a view to combating terrorism – Freezing of funds – Common Position 2001/931/CFSP – Applicability to situations of armed conflict – Terrorist group – Factual basis of the fund-freezing decisions – Decision taken by a competent authority – Authority of a third State – Review – Proportionality – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Right to effective judicial protection – Modification of the application.#Joined Cases T-316/14 RENV and T-148/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 November 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0698_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 30 November 2022.#Trasta Komercbanka AS and Others v European Central Bank.#Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Specific supervisory tasks assigned to the ECB – Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation – Death of an applicant – No need to adjudicate in part – Powers of the national authorities of participating Member States and of the ECB under the Single Supervisory Mechanism – Equal treatment – Proportionality – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Misuse of powers – Rights of the defence – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-698/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 November 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0698decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 30 November 2022.#Trasta Komercbanka AS and Others v European Central Bank.#Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Specific supervisory tasks assigned to the ECB – Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation – Death of an applicant – No need to adjudicate in part – Powers of the national authorities of participating Member States and of the ECB under the Single Supervisory Mechanism – Equal treatment – Proportionality – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Misuse of powers – Rights of the defence – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-698/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 November 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62014TJ0316(01)decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 30 November 2022.#Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures against the PKK with a view to combating terrorism – Freezing of funds – Common Position 2001/931/CFSP – Applicability to situations of armed conflict – Terrorist group – Factual basis of the fund-freezing decisions – Decision taken by a competent authority – Authority of a third State – Review – Proportionality – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Right to effective judicial protection – Modification of the application.#Joined Cases T-316/14 RENV and T-148/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 November 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0175_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 November 2022.#Harman International Industries, Inc. v AB SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Articles 34 and 36 TFEU – Free movement of goods – Intellectual property – EU trade mark – Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 15 – Exhaustion of the rights conferred by a trade mark – Placing on the market within the European Economic Area (EEA) – Consent of the proprietor of the trade mark – Place of first marketing of products by the proprietor of the trade mark or with its consent – Proof – Directive 2004/48/EC – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Effective judicial protection – Operative part of judicial decisions not identifying the products covered – Difficulties in implementation – Restricted scope of action before the competent court for enforcement – Fair trial – Rights of the defence – Principle of the equality of arms.#Case C-175/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 November 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0175decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 November 2022.#Harman International Industries, Inc. v AB SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Articles 34 and 36 TFEU – Free movement of goods – Intellectual property – EU trade mark – Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 15 – Exhaustion of the rights conferred by a trade mark – Placing on the market within the European Economic Area (EEA) – Consent of the proprietor of the trade mark – Place of first marketing of products by the proprietor of the trade mark or with its consent – Proof – Directive 2004/48/EC – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Effective judicial protection – Operative part of judicial decisions not identifying the products covered – Difficulties in implementation – Restricted scope of action before the competent court for enforcement – Fair trial – Rights of the defence – Principle of the equality of arms.#Case C-175/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 November 2022

Report· XGCELEX 52022XG1115(10)open

The following information is brought to the attention of - ABDOLLAHI Hamed, AL-NASSER Abdelkarim Hussein Mohamed, AL-YACOUB Ibrahim Salih Mohammed, ARBABSIAR Manssor, ASSADI Assadollah, BOUYERI Mohammed, EL HAJJ Hassan Hassan, AL-DIN Izz Hasan, MELIAD Farah, MOHAMMED Khalid Sheikh, SHAHLAI Abdul Reza, SHAKURI Ali Gholam, Al-Aqsa Martyrs’ Brigade, Communist Party of the Philippines’, including ‘New People’s Army’ – ‘NPA’, Hizballah Military Wing, Ejército de Liberación Nacional (‘National Liberation Army’), Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine – ‘PFLP’, Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine – General Command, Sendero Luminoso – ‘SL’ (‘Shining Path’), and Teyrbazen Azadiya Kurdistan’ – ‘TAK’ persons and groups included on the list of persons, groups and entities subject to Articles 2, 3 and 4 of Council Common Position 2001/931/CFSP on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism and to Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism(see Annexes to Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/1241 and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1230) 2022/C 433/16

European Union · Council of the European Union · 15 November 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0203_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 November 2022.#Criminal proceedings against DELTA STROY 2003.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2005/212/JHA – Applicability – Imposition of a financial penalty on a legal person for non-payment of tax debts – Concept of ‘confiscation’ – Articles 48, 49 and 52 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Penalties of a criminal nature – Principles of the presumption of innocence and the legality and proportionality of criminal offences and penalties – Rights of the defence – Imposition of a criminal penalty on a legal person for an offence committed by the representative of that legal person – Parallel criminal proceedings against that representative that have not been concluded – Proportionality.#Case C-203/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 November 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0667_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 9 November 2022 (Extracts).#Ferriere Nord SpA v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for concrete reinforcing bars – Decision finding an infringement of Article 65 CS, after expiry of the ECSC Treaty, on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Price fixing – Limiting and controlling output and sales – Decision taken following the annulment of earlier decisions – New hearing held in the presence of the competition authorities of the Member States – Rights of the defence – Principle of sound administration – Reasonable time – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality – Ne bis in idem principle – Plea of illegality – Evidence of involvement in the cartel – Aggravating circumstances – Repeated infringement – Mitigating circumstances – Equal treatment – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-667/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 November 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0657_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 9 November 2022 (Extracts).#Feralpi Holding SpA v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for concrete reinforcing bars – Decision finding an infringement of Article 65 CS, after expiry of the ECSC Treaty, on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Price fixing – Limiting and controlling output and sales – Decision taken following the annulment of earlier decisions – New hearing held in the presence of the competition authorities of the Member States – Rights of the defence – Principle of sound administration – Reasonable time – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality – Ne bis in idem principle – Plea of illegality – Single, complex and continuous infringement – Evidence of involvement in the cartel – Public distancing – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-657/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 November 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0655_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 9 November 2022.#Ferriera Valsabbia SpA and Valsabbia Investimenti SpA v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for concrete reinforcing bars – Decision finding an infringement of Article 65 CS after the expiry of the ECSC Treaty on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Fixing of prices – Limiting and controlling output and sales – Decision adopted following the annulment of earlier decisions – Holding of a new hearing attended by the competition authorities of the Member States – Rights of the defence – Principle of sound administration – Reasonable time – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-655/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 November 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0246_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 9 November 2022.#Kingdom of Cambodia and Cambodia Rice Federation (CRF) v European Commission.#Safeguard measures – Rice market – Imports of Indica rice originating in Cambodia and Myanmar/Burma – Regulation (EU) No 978/2012 – Concept of ‘Union producers’ – Concept of ‘like or directly competing products’ – Serious difficulties – Rights of the defence – Essential facts and considerations – Manifest errors of assessment.#Case T-246/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 November 2022

Page 1 of 2Next