Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Education

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

201 records in EU

Records

Record· COCELEX 62020CO0571decided

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 May 2021.#OM v Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca - MIUR and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Potenza.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Reference for a preliminary ruling on the validity of a provision of the FEU Treaty – Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court – Freedom of movement for workers – Equal treatment – Article 45 TFEU – Difference in status and salary between university teachers and teachers working in the art and music higher education national system – Purely internal situation – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-571/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 May 2021

Record· COCELEX 62020CO0571_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 May 2021.#OM v Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca - MIUR and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Reference for a preliminary ruling on the validity of a provision of the FEU Treaty – Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court – Freedom of movement for workers – Equal treatment – Article 45 TFEU – Difference in status and salary between university teachers and teachers working in the art and music higher education national system – Purely internal situation – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-571/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 May 2021

Report· CCCELEX 62019CC0282decided

Opinion of Advocate General Tanchev delivered on 18 March 2021.#YT and Others v Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca - MIUR and Ufficio Scolastico Regionale per la Campania.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Napoli.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clauses 4 and 5 – Fixed-term employment contracts in the public sector – Catholic religious education teachers – Concept of ‘objective reasons’ justifying the renewal of such contracts – Permanent need for replacement staff.#Case C-282/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 March 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0108_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 24 February 2021.#Universität Koblenz-Landau v Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency.#Arbitration clause – Tempus IV Programmes – Grant agreements – Contractual nature of the dispute – Reclassification of the action – Eligible costs – Systemic and recurrent irregularities – Full repayment of amounts paid – Proportionality – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-108/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 February 2021

Record· TOCELEX 62020TO0034_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 18 January 2021.#Datenlotsen Informationssysteme GmbH v European Commission.#Action for annulment – State aid – Software solutions for universities – Tax advantages and public funding – Formal investigation procedure – Decision classifying the implemented measures as existing aid – Lack of individual concern – No regulatory act – Inadmissibility.#Case T-34/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 January 2021

Record· TOCELEX 62020TO0034decided

Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 18 January 2021.#Datenlotsen Informationssysteme GmbH v European Commission.#Action for annulment – State aid – Software solutions for universities – Tax advantages and public funding – Formal investigation procedure – Decision classifying the implemented measures as existing aid – Lack of individual concern – No regulatory act – Inadmissibility.#Case T-34/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 January 2021

Question· QUESTION_WRITTENE-9-2020-005651answered

Private education sector

European Union · European Parliament · 16 October 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0066_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 October 2020.#European Commission v Hungary.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Admissibility – Jurisdiction of the Court – General Agreement on Trade in Services – Article XVI – Market access – Schedule of specific commitments – Requirement of authorisation – Article XX(2) – Article XVII – National treatment – Service provider having its seat in a third country – National legislation of a Member State imposing conditions for the supply of higher education services within its territory – Requirement relating to the conclusion of an international treaty with the State in which the provider has its seat – Requirement relating to the provision of education in the State in which the provider has its seat – Modification of conditions of competition to the benefit of national providers – Justification – Public order – Prevention of deceptive practices – Article 49 TFEU – Freedom of establishment – Directive 2006/123/EC – Services in the internal market – Article 16 – Article 56 TFEU – Freedom to provide services – Existence of a restriction – Justification – Overriding reason in the public interest – Public order – Prevention of deceptive practices – High quality of the education – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 13 – Academic freedom – Article 14(3) – Freedom to found educational establishments – Article 16 – Freedom to conduct a business – Article 52(1).#Case C-66/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 October 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0066decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 October 2020.#European Commission v Hungary.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Admissibility – Jurisdiction of the Court – General Agreement on Trade in Services – Article XVI – Market access – Schedule of specific commitments – Requirement of authorisation – Article XX(2) – Article XVII – National treatment – Service provider having its seat in a third country – National legislation of a Member State imposing conditions for the supply of higher education services within its territory – Requirement relating to the conclusion of an international treaty with the State in which the provider has its seat – Requirement relating to the provision of education in the State in which the provider has its seat – Modification of conditions of competition to the benefit of national providers – Justification – Public order – Prevention of deceptive practices – Article 49 TFEU – Freedom of establishment – Directive 2006/123/EC – Services in the internal market – Article 16 – Article 56 TFEU – Freedom to provide services – Existence of a restriction – Justification – Overriding reason in the public interest – Public order – Prevention of deceptive practices – High quality of the education – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 13 – Academic freedom – Article 14(3) – Freedom to found educational establishments – Article 16 – Freedom to conduct a business – Article 52(1).#Case C-66/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 October 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0408decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Aristoteleio Panepistimio Thessalonikis v Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency.#Arbitration clause – Grant agreement entered into under Erasmus Mundus action programme No 3 for the promotion of higher education – Grant agreement entered into under the programme for lifelong learning – Eligible costs – Debit notes – Repayment of part of the sums advanced – Contractual liability.#Case T-408/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 September 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0408_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Aristoteleio Panepistimio Thessalonikis v Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency.#Arbitration clause – Grant agreement entered into under Erasmus Mundus action programme No 3 for the promotion of higher education – Grant agreement entered into under the programme for lifelong learning – Eligible costs – Debit notes – Repayment of part of the sums advanced – Contractual liability.#Case T-408/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 September 2020

PreviousPage 4 of 5Next