Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

801 records in EU in 2018

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773France · 7,181Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778Germany · 305Austria · 222United States · 141Belgium · 1Estonia · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0426decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 April 2018.#Perfumes y Aromas Artesanales, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark Aa AROMAS artesanales — Earlier EU figurative mark Aromas PERFUMARIA Beleza em todos os sentidos — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Identity or similarity of the services — Similarity of the signs — Relevant public — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-426/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 April 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0312decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 April 2018.#Walfood SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark CHATKA — Earlier international figurative mark CHATKA — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-312/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 April 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0756decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 25 April 2018.#Euro Castor Green v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a trellis — Earlier Community design — Ground for invalidity — Disclosure of earlier design — Lack of novelty — No individual character — Articles 5, 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-756/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 April 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0213decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 25 April 2018.#Romantik Hotels & Restaurants AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark ROMANTIK — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — No distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(1)(b) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-213/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 April 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0248decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 April 2018.#Walfood SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings –– EU figurative mark CHATKA — Earlier international figurative mark CHATKA — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 57(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 64(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-248/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 April 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0297decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 24 April 2018.#VSM . Vereinigte Schmirgel- und Maschinen-Fabriken AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union trade mark — Application for EU word mark WE KNOW ABRASIVES — Mark consisting of an advertising slogan — Competence of the Board of Appeal in appeals limited to part of the services covered by the application for registration — Article 64(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 71(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctiveness — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-297/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 April 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0221decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 April 2018.#Mémora Servicios Funerarios SLU v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark MEMORAME — Earlier EU figurative mark mémora and earlier national word marks MÉMORA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the goods and services — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-221/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 April 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0831decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 24 April 2018.#Kabushiki Kaisha Zoom v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark ZOOM — Earlier EU figurative and word marks ZOOM — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-831/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 April 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0207decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 24 April 2018.#Senetic S.A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark hp — Absolute grounds for refusal — Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001) — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Bad faith — Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-207/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 April 2018

Record· CJCELEX 62016CJ0353decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 April 2018.#MP v Secretary of State for the Home Department.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Asylum policy — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 4 — Directive 2004/83/EC — Article 2(e) — Eligibility for subsidiary protection — Article 15(b) — Risk of serious harm to the psychological health of the applicant if returned to the country of origin — Person who has been tortured in the country of origin.#Case C-353/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 April 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0183decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 April 2018.#Menta y Limón Decoración, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark representing a man in regional costume — Earlier national industrial designs — Relative ground for refusal — Article 53(2)(d) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(2)(d) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Use of the EU trade mark prohibited under national law — Application of national law by EUIPO.#Case T-183/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 April 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0208decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 24 April 2018.#Senetic S.A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark HP — Absolute grounds for refusal — Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001) — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Bad faith — Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-208/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 April 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0354decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 23 April 2018.#Genomic Health, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark ONCOTYPE DX GENOMIC PROSTATE SCORE — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptiveness — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Equal treatment.#Case T-354/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 April 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0015decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 20 April 2018.#Dimitrios Mitrakos v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark YAMAS — Earlier EU word mark LLAMA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-15/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 April 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0439decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 20 April 2018.#holyGhost GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark holyGhost — Earlier EU word mark HOLY — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-439/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 April 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0025decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 April 2018.#Bernhard Rintisch v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark PROTICURD — Earlier national word marks PROTI and PROTIPLUS — Earlier national figurative mark Proti Power — Relative ground for refusal — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Genuine use of the earlier marks — Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Goods not similar — No likelihood of confusion.#Case T-25/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 April 2018

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0075decided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 April 2018.#Fiesta Hotels & Resorts, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 8(4) — Article 65 — Unregistered trade name GRAND HOTEL PALLADIUM — Figurative mark containing the word elements ‘PALLADIUM PALACE IBIZA RESORT & SPA’ — Application for a declaration of invalidity based on a prior right acquired pursuant to national law — Conditions — Sign of more than merely local significance — Right to prohibit the use of a subsequent trade mark.#Case C-75/17 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 April 2018

Record· CJCELEX 62016CJ0478decided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 April 2018.#European Union Intellectual Property Office v Group OOD.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark — Relative grounds for refusal — Opposition by the proprietor of a non-registered trade mark or other sign used in the course of trade — Examination by the Board of Appeal — New or supplementary evidence — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 76(2) — Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 — Third subparagraph of Rule 50(1).#Case C-478/16 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 April 2018

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0152decided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 19 April 2018.#Consorzio Italian Management and Catania Multiservizi SpA v Rete Ferroviaria Italiana SpA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors — Directive 2004/17/EC — Obligation to review prices after the award of the contract — No such obligation in Directive 2004/17/EC or arising from the general principles underlying Article 56 TFEU and Directive 2004/17/EC — Cleaning and maintenance services linked to railway transport operations — Article 3(3) TEU — Articles 26, 57, 58 and 101 TFEU — Lack of sufficient information concerning the factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for a reply to the questions referred — Inadmissibility — Article 16 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Provision of national law not implementing EU law — Lack of jurisdiction.#Case C-152/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 April 2018

Decision· DCELEX 32018D0641in force

Council Decision (EU) 2018/641 of 17 April 2018 on the position to be adopted on the behalf of the European Union within the EU-Algeria Association Committee as regards the modification of the conditions of application of the preferential tariffs for agricultural products and processed agricultural products set out in Article 14 of the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an Association between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the People's Democratic Republic of Algeria, of the other part

European Union · EUR-Lex · 17 April 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0364decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 17 April 2018.#Marcin Bielawski v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark HOUSE OF CARS — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Legitimate expectations — Legal certainty.#Case T-364/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 April 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0648decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 17 April 2018.#Şölen Çikolata Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark BOBO cornet — Prior EU figurative mark OZMO cornet — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-648/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 April 2018

Record· CJCELEX 62016CJ0316decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 April 2018.#B v Land Baden-Württemberg and Secretary of State for the Home Department v Franco Vomero.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof Baden-Württemberg and the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom.#References for a preliminary ruling — Citizenship of the European Union — Right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States — Directive 2004/38/EC — Article 28(3)(a) — Enhanced protection against expulsion — Conditions — Right of permanent residence — Residence in the host Member State for the 10 years preceding the decision to expel the person concerned from that Member State — Period of imprisonment — Consequences as regards the continuity of the 10-year period of residence — Connection with the overall assessment of an integrative link — Time at which that assessment must be carried out and criteria to be taken into account in that assessment.#Joined Cases C-316/16 and C-424/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 April 2018

Record· CJCELEX 62016CJ0414decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 April 2018.#Vera Egenberger v Evangelisches Werk für Diakonie und Entwicklung e.V.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2000/78/CE — Equal treatment — Difference of treatment on grounds of religion or belief — Occupational activities within churches and other organisations the ethos of which is based on religion or belief — Religion or belief constituting a genuine, legitimate and justified occupational requirement, having regard to the organisation’s ethos — Concept — Nature and context of the activities — Article 17 TFEU — Articles 10, 21 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-414/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 April 2018

Proposal· PCCELEX 52018PC0191open

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT pursuant to Article 294(6) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union concerning the position of the Council on the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union and Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Union

European Union · European Commission · 17 April 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62015TJ0339decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 April 2018.#Polski Koncern Naftowy Orlen SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union trade mark — Application for EU three-dimensional marks — Shape of a petrol station — Absolute ground for refusal — Distinctiveness — Article 65(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 72(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Acts having fully upheld the applicant’s claims — Binding nature of the grounds of an order for reference — Admissibility — Obligation to state reasons.#Cases T-339/15 to T-343/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 April 2018

Report· AGCELEX 52018AG0001(01)open

Position (EU) No 1/2018 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union and Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Union Adopted by the Council on 16 April 2018

European Union · Council of the European Union · 16 April 2018

Record· COCELEX 62017CO0651decided

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 April 2018.#Grupo Osborne SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — EU trade mark — Application for registration of the figurative mark containing the word element ‘BADTORO’ — Opposition proceedings — Earlier national figurative mark containing the word element ‘TORO’ — Earlier national word mark EL TORO — Earlier European Union word mark TORO — Relative ground for refusal — Refusal of registration — Annulment — No likelihood of confusion.#Case C-651/17 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 April 2018

Record· TOCELEX 62017TO0386decided

Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 April 2018.#Lackmann Fleisch- und Feinkostfabrik GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark Лидер — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-386/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 April 2018

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0110decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 April 2018.#European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Free movement of capital — Article 63 TFEU — Article 40 of the EEA Agreement — Tax on the income of Belgian residents — Calculation of income from immovable property — Application of two different calculation methods depending on the place in which the immovable property is situated — Calculation on the basis of the cadastral value for immovable property located in Belgium — Calculation based on the actual rental value for immovable property located in another Member State of the European Union or the European Economic Area (EEA) — Difference in treatment — Restriction on the free movement of capital.#Case C-110/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 April 2018

Record· COCELEX 62017CO0652decided

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 April 2018.#Grupo Osborne SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — EU trade mark — Application for registration of the figurative mark containing the word element “BADTORO” — Opposition proceedings — Earlier figurative and word marks of the European Union TORO — Relative ground for refusal — Rejection in part of the application for registration — Annulment — No likelihood of confusion.#Case C-652/17 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 April 2018

PreviousPage 16 of 17Next