Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

101 records in EU in 2019

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778France · 493Germany · 292United States · 141Austria · 75Belgium · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0527_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 December 2019.#Margarita Tàpias v Council of the European Union.#Civil service — Reform of the Staff Regulations and of the CEOS which entered into force on 1 January 2014 — Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1023/2013 — Solidarity levy applicable from 1 January 2014 — Suspension of the application of the method for updating remuneration for 2013 and 2014.#Case T-527/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 December 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0143_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 December 2019.#Der Grüne Punkt - Duales System Deutschland GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Articles 15 and 66 — Genuine use of an EU collective trade mark — Mark concerning a system of collection and recovery of packaging waste — Affixing to the packaging of goods for which the mark is registered.#Case C-143/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 December 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0648_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 December 2019.#Super bock group, SGPS SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Crystal — Earlier national word mark CRISTAL — Relative ground for refusal — No similarity between the goods — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-648/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 December 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0267_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 December 2019.#gastivo portal GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark depicting a fork on a green background — Earlier EU figurative mark gastivo — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-267/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 December 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0713_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 12 December 2019.#Ramón Guiral Broto v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request for the appeal to be allowed to proceed not demonstrating that the issue is significant — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-713/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 December 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0255_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 December 2019.#Baustoffwerke Gebhart & Söhne GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark BIOTON — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-255/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 December 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0266_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 December 2019.#gastivo portal GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark depicting a fork on a green background — Earlier EU figurative mark gastivo — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-266/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 December 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0714_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may succeed) of 12 December 2019.#Ramón Guiral Broto v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request for the appeal to be allowed to proceed not demonstrating that the issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-714/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 December 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0727decided

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 December 2019.#Guy Steifer v European Economic and Social Committee.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Civil service — Official — Pensions — Pension rights acquired before entering the service of the European Union — Transfer to the EU scheme — Additional years of pensionable service — Reimbursement of the amount of pension rights not taken into account in the scheme for calculating years of European Union pensionable service — Material new facts.#Case C-727/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 December 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0266decided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 December 2019.#gastivo portal GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark depicting a fork on a green background — Earlier EU figurative mark gastivo — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-266/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 December 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0255decided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 December 2019.#Baustoffwerke Gebhart & Söhne GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark BIOTON — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-255/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 December 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0267decided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 December 2019.#gastivo portal GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark depicting a fork on a green background — Earlier EU figurative mark gastivo — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-267/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 December 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0648decided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 December 2019.#Super bock group, SGPS SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Crystal — Earlier national word mark CRISTAL — Relative ground for refusal — No similarity between the goods — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-648/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 December 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0747decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 December 2019.#Refan Bulgaria OOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for a three-dimensional EU trade mark — Shape of a flower — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptiveness — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Rights of the defence — Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-747/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 December 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0747_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 December 2019.#Refan Bulgaria OOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for a three-dimensional EU trade mark — Shape of a flower — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptiveness — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Rights of the defence — Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-747/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 December 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0715_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 12 December 2019.#Ramón Guiral Broto v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request for the appeal to be allowed to proceed not demonstrating that the issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-715/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 December 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0727_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 December 2019.#Guy Steifer v European Economic and Social Committee.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Civil service — Official — Pensions — Pension rights acquired before entering the service of the European Union — Transfer to the EU scheme — Additional years of pensionable service — Reimbursement of the amount of pension rights not taken into account in the scheme for calculating years of European Union pensionable service — Material new facts.#Case C-727/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 December 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0783_INFdecided

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 December 2019.#European Union Intellectual Property Office v Wajos GmbH.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 7(1)(b) — Absolute ground for refusal — Marks devoid of distinctive character — Three-dimensional marks consisting of the shape of the product — Criteria for the assessment of distinctive character — Obligation to state reasons — Form of a container — Amphora.#Case C-783/18 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 December 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0713decided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 12 December 2019.#Ramón Guiral Broto v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request for the appeal to be allowed to proceed not demonstrating that the issue is significant — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-713/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 December 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0714decided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may succeed) of 12 December 2019.#Ramón Guiral Broto v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request for the appeal to be allowed to proceed not demonstrating that the issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-714/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 December 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0715decided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 12 December 2019.#Ramón Guiral Broto v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request for the appeal to be allowed to proceed not demonstrating that the issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-715/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 December 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0143decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 December 2019.#Der Grüne Punkt - Duales System Deutschland GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Articles 15 and 66 — Genuine use of an EU collective trade mark — Mark concerning a system of collection and recovery of packaging waste — Affixing to the packaging of goods for which the mark is registered.#Case C-143/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 December 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0527decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 December 2019.#Margarita Tàpias v Council of the European Union.#Civil service — Reform of the Staff Regulations and of the CEOS which entered into force on 1 January 2014 — Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1023/2013 — Solidarity levy applicable from 1 January 2014 — Suspension of the application of the method for updating remuneration for 2013 and 2014.#Case T-527/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 December 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0783decided

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 December 2019.#European Union Intellectual Property Office v Wajos GmbH.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 7(1)(b) — Absolute ground for refusal — Marks devoid of distinctive character — Three-dimensional marks consisting of the shape of the product — Criteria for the assessment of distinctive character — Obligation to state reasons — Form of a container — Amphora.#Case C-783/18 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 December 2019

Record· TOCELEX 62019TO0066_RESdecided

Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 December 2019.#Vlaamse Gemeenschap and Vlaams Gewest v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Internal market – Fundamental freedoms – Regulation (EU) 2018/1724 – Establishment of a single digital gateway to provide access to information, to procedures and to assistance and problem-solving services – Sub-national authority – Standing to bring proceedings – Individual concern – Inadmissibility.#Case T-66/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 December 2019

Record· TOCELEX 62019TO0066decided

Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 December 2019.#Vlaamse Gemeenschap and Vlaams Gewest v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Internal market – Fundamental freedoms – Regulation (EU) 2018/1724 – Establishment of a single digital gateway to provide access to information, to procedures and to assistance and problem-solving services – Sub-national authority – Standing to bring proceedings – Individual concern – Inadmissibility.#Case T-66/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 December 2019

Decision· DCELEX 32019D2208in force

Council Decision (EU) 2019/2208 of 9 December 2019 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the EPA Committee established under the stepping stone Economic Partnership Agreement between Ghana, of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part, as regards the adoption of Protocol No. 1 concerning the definition of the concept of originating products and methods of administrative cooperation

European Union · EUR-Lex · 9 December 2019

Decision· DCELEX 32019D2073in force

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2019/2073 of 5 December 2019 on the conclusion of the Agreement between the United States of America and the European Union on the Allocation to the United States of a Share in the Tariff Rate Quota for High Quality Beef referred to in the Revised Memorandum of Understanding Regarding the Importation of Beef from Animals Not Treated with Certain Growth-Promoting Hormones and Increased Duties Applied by the United States to Certain Products of the European Union (2014)

European Union · EUR-Lex · 5 December 2019

Decision· DCELEX 32019D2145in force

Council Decision (EU) 2019/2145 of 5 December 2019 on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and Ukraine amending the trade preferences for poultry meat and poultry meat preparations provided for by the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part

European Union · EUR-Lex · 5 December 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0029_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 December 2019.#Idea Groupe v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark Idealogistic Verhoeven Greatest care in getting it there — Earlier national word marks idéa logistique, IDEA and groupe idea — Earlier national figurative mark iDÉA — International registrations designating the European Union — Earlier figurative mark iDÉA and earlier word mark IDEA — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Use of a sign in the course of trade of more than mere local significance — Article 8(4) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-29/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 December 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0664_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may succeed) of 5 December 2019.#Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o. o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request not raising an issue that is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-664/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 December 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0664decided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may succeed) of 5 December 2019.#Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o. o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request not raising an issue that is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-664/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 December 2019

PreviousPage 2 of 3Next