Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

1,301 records in EU in 2022

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773France · 7,181Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778Germany · 305Austria · 222United States · 141Belgium · 1Estonia · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0715_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Degode-Dermago Development GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Skinovea – Earlier national word mark SKINOREN – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-715/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0125decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Banco de Investimento Global SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark EUROBIC – Earlier EU figurative marks BiG, BANCO BiG and BiGlobal TRADE – Earlier national word marks BANCO BIG and earlier national figurative mark BANCO BiG – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-125/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0171_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Ubisoft Entertainment v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark FOR HONOR – Earlier EU word mark HONOR – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-171/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0333_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Fidia farmaceutici SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark IALO TSP – Earlier international word mark HYALO – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Identification of a member of the Board of Appeal – Article 165(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-333/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0001_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Fabryki Mebli "Forte" S.A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing an item of furniture – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – Article 6(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Disclosure of the earlier design – Article 7(1) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Decision adopted following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision – Res judicata.#Case T-1/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0333decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Fidia farmaceutici SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark IALO TSP – Earlier international word mark HYALO – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Identification of a member of the Board of Appeal – Article 165(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-333/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0086_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Distintiva Solutions S. Coop. Pequeña v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Makeblock – Absolute grounds for refusal – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Mark not of such a nature as to mislead the public – Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-86/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0615_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Mood Media Netherlands BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark MOOD MEDIA – Genuine use of the mark – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 15(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 18(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Proof of genuine use.#Case T-615/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0149_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#UGA Nutraceuticals Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark VITADHA – Earlier Spanish word mark VITANADH – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-149/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0669_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Pluscard Service-Gesellschaft für Kreditkarten-Processing mbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark PLUSCARD – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-669/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0615decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Mood Media Netherlands BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark MOOD MEDIA – Genuine use of the mark – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 15(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 18(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Proof of genuine use.#Case T-615/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 March 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0275_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 1 March 2022.#European Commission v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Decision (EU) 2020/470 – Extension of the period of entitlement for audiovisual co-productions as provided for in Article 5 of the Protocol on Cultural Cooperation to the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Korea, of the other part – Procedural legal basis – Article 218(7) TFEU – Applicable procedure and voting rule.#Case C-275/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 March 2022

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0306_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 1 March 2022.#Milis Energy SpA and Others v Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri and Others.#References for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Environment – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 16 and 17 – Principles of legal certainty and protection of legitimate expectations – Energy Charter Treaty – Article 10 – Applicability – Directive 2009/28/EC – Article 3(3)(a) – Promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources – Production of electricity from solar photovoltaic installations – Amendment of an aid scheme.#Joined Cases C-306/19, C-512/19, C-595/19 and C-608/20 to C-610/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 March 2022

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0306decided

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 1 March 2022.#Milis Energy SpA and Others v Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.#References for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Environment – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 16 and 17 – Principles of legal certainty and protection of legitimate expectations – Energy Charter Treaty – Article 10 – Applicability – Directive 2009/28/EC – Article 3(3)(a) – Promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources – Production of electricity from solar photovoltaic installations – Amendment of an aid scheme.#Joined Cases C-306/19, C-512/19, C-595/19 and C-608/20 to C-610/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 March 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0275decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 1 March 2022.#European Commission v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Decision (EU) 2020/470 – Extension of the period of entitlement for audiovisual co-productions as provided for in Article 5 of the Protocol on Cultural Cooperation to the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Korea, of the other part – Procedural legal basis – Article 218(7) TFEU – Applicable procedure and voting rule.#Case C-275/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 March 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0582_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#SC Cridar Cons SRL v Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Cluj and Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Cluj-Napoca.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax – Directive 2006/112/EC – Articles 167 and 168 – Right to deduction – Refusal – Tax evasion – Taking of evidence – Suspension of examination of an administrative complaint relating to a notice of assessment refusing a right to deduction, pending the outcome of criminal proceedings – Procedural autonomy of the Member States – Principle of fiscal neutrality – Right to good administration – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-582/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 February 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0262_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#VB v Glavna direktsia 'Pozharna bezopasnost i zashtita na naselenieto'.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Organisation of working time – Directive 2003/88/EC – Article 8 – Article 12(а) – Articles 20 and 31 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Reduction of the normal duration of night work in relation to day work – Public-sector workers and private-sector workers – Equal treatment.#Case C-262/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 February 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0283_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#CO and Others v MJ and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) – European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (Eulex Kosovo) – Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP – Article 8(3) and (5), Article 9(3) and Article 10(3) – Status of employer of the mission staff – Article 16(5) – Subrogation.#Case C-283/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 February 2022

Record· TOCELEX 62021TO0442decided

Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#Rhiannon Thomas and Michaël Julien v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Area of freedom, security and justice – Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and Euratom, of the one part, and the United Kingdom, of the other part – Council decision on the conclusion of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement – Act not of individual concern – Non-regulatory act – Inadmissibility.#Case T-442/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 February 2022

Record· TOCELEX 62021TO0442_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#Rhiannon Thomas and Michaël Julien v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Area of freedom, security and justice – Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and Euratom, of the one part, and the United Kingdom, of the other part – Council decision on the conclusion of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement – Act not of individual concern – Non-regulatory act – Inadmissibility.#Case T-442/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 February 2022

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0678decided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 24 February 2022.#Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-678/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 February 2022

Report· CCCELEX 62020CC0673decided

Opinion of Advocate General Collins delivered on 24 February 2022.#EP v Préfet du Gers and Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques (INSEE).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal judiciaire d’Auch.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the Union – National of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland residing in a Member State – Article 9 TEU – Articles 20 and 22 TFEU – Right to vote and to stand as a candidate in municipal elections in the Member State of residence. – Article 50 TEU – Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community – Consequences of the withdrawal of a Member State from the Union – Removal from the electoral roll in the Member State of residence – Articles 39 and 40 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Validity of Decision (EU) 2020/135.#Case C-673/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 February 2022

Report· CCCELEX 62021CC0110decided

Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 24 February 2022.#Universität Bremen v European Research Executive Agency.#Appeal – Action for annulment – Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Representation of non-privileged parties in a direct action before the Courts of the European Union – University teacher – University teacher teaching at the university represented in that action and performing duties as coordinator and head of the project that is the subject matter of the dispute – Condition of independence – Existence of a direct and personal interest in the outcome of the dispute.#Case C-110/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 February 2022

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0678_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 24 February 2022.#Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-678/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 February 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0198_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 February 2022.#Ancor Group GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – EU word mark CODE-X – Earlier national word and figurative marks Cody’s – Earlier international figurative mark Cody’s – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-198/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 February 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0209_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 23 February 2022.#Ignacio Carrasco SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark La Hoja del Carrasco – Earlier national figurative mark CARRASCO, Guijuelo – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Dominant and distinctive elements of the marks at issue.#Case T-209/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 February 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0209decided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 23 February 2022.#Ignacio Carrasco SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark La Hoja del Carrasco – Earlier national figurative mark CARRASCO, Guijuelo – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Dominant and distinctive elements of the marks at issue.#Case T-209/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 February 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0184decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 February 2022.#Lackmann Fleisch- und Feinkostfabrik GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Хозяин – Earlier national figurative mark хозяюшка – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-184/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 February 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0185decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 February 2022.#Lackmann Fleisch- und Feinkostfabrik GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Хозяйка – Earlier national figurative mark хозяюшка – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-185/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 February 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0184_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 February 2022.#Lackmann Fleisch- und Feinkostfabrik GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Хозяин – Earlier national figurative mark хозяюшка – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-184/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 February 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0185_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 February 2022.#Lackmann Fleisch- und Feinkostfabrik GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Хозяйка – Earlier national figurative mark хозяюшка – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-185/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 February 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0483_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 February 2022.#XXXX v Commissaire général aux réfugiés et aux apatrides.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common policy on asylum – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 33(2)(a) – Inadmissibility of an application for international protection lodged in a Member State by a third-country national who has obtained refugee status in another Member State, where the minor child of that third-country national, who is a beneficiary of subsidiary protection status, resides in the first Member State – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 7 – Right to respect for family life – Article 24 – Best interests of the child – No infringement of Articles 7 and 24 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights due to the inadmissibility of the application for international protection – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 23(2) – Obligation on the Member States to ensure the family unity of beneficiaries of international protection is maintained.#Case C-483/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 February 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0430_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 February 2022.#Proceedings brought by RS.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rule of law – Independence of the judiciary – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Primacy of EU law – Lack of jurisdiction of a national court to examine the conformity with EU law of national legislation found to be constitutional by the constitutional court of the Member State concerned – Disciplinary proceedings.#Case C-430/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 February 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0562_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 February 2022.#X and Y v Openbaar Ministerie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 1(3) – Surrender procedures between Member States – Conditions for execution – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Second paragraph of Article 47 – Fundamental right to a fair trial before an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Systemic or generalised deficiencies – Two-step examination – Criteria for application – Obligation of the executing judicial authority to determine, specifically and precisely, whether there are substantial grounds for believing that the person in respect of whom a European arrest warrant has been issued, if surrendered, runs a real risk of breach of his or her fundamental right to a fair trial before an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law.#Joined Cases C-562/21 PPU and C-563/21 PPU.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 February 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0160_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 February 2022.#Stichting Rookpreventie Jeugd and Others v Staatssecretaris van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2014/40/EU – Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products – Products not complying with the maximum emission levels – Prohibition on placing on the market – Measurement method – Filter cigarettes with small ventilation holes – Measurement of the emissions on the basis of ISO standards – Standards not published in the Official Journal of the European Union – Compliance with the publication requirements laid down in Article 297(1) TFEU read in the light of the principle of legal certainty – Compliance with the principle of transparency.#Case C-160/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 February 2022

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0674_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals should proceed) of 22 February 2022.#Residencial Palladium, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-674/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 February 2022

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0674decided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals should proceed) of 22 February 2022.#Residencial Palladium, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-674/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 February 2022

PreviousPage 26 of 27Next