Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

1,401 records in EU in 2022

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773France · 7,181Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778Germany · 305Austria · 294United States · 141Belgium · 1Estonia · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0116_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 February 2022.#Maternus GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark WILD – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 52(1)(a) and Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(a) and Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-116/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 February 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0202decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 February 2022.#Vita Zahnfabrik H. Rauter GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark VITABLOCS TriLuxe forte – Earlier EU word mark TRILUX – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-202/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 February 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0238_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 27 January 2022.#'Sātiņi-S' SIA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 17 – Right to property – Directive 2009/147/EC – Compensation for the damage caused to aquaculture by protected wild birds in a Natura 2000 area – Compensation less than the damage actually suffered – Article 107(1) TFEU – State aid – Concept of ‘advantage’ – Conditions – Regulation (EU) No 717/2014 – De minimis rule.#Case C-238/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 January 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0788_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 27 January 2022.#European Commission v Kingdom of Spain.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Free movement of capital – Obligation to provide information concerning assets or rights held in other Member States of the European Union or the European Economic Area (EEA) – Failure to comply with that obligation – Limitation – Penalties.#Case C-788/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 January 2022

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0557_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 27 January 2022.#Acciona, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-557/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 January 2022

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0557decided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 27 January 2022.#Acciona, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-557/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 January 2022

Report· CCCELEX 62019CC0817decided

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 27 January 2022.#Ligue des droits humains ASBL v Conseil des ministres.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour constitutionnelle.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Processing of personal data – Passenger Name Record (PNR) data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 2(2)(d) – Scope – Directive (EU) 2016/681 – Use of PNR data of air passengers of flights operated between the European Union and third countries – Power to include data of air passengers of flights operated within the European Union – Automated processing of those data – Retention period – Fight against terrorist offences and serious crime – Validity – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 7, 8 and 21 as well as Article 52(1) – National legislation extending the application of the PNR system to other transport operations within the European Union – Freedom of movement within the European Union – Charter of Fundamental Rights – Article 45.#Case C-817/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 January 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0234decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 27 January 2022.#'Sātiņi-S' SIA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) – Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 – Support for rural development – Article 30(6)(a) – Natura 2000 payments – Compensation for income foregone in agricultural and forest areas – Peat bogs – Prohibition of establishing plantations of cranberries – No compensation for damage – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 17 – Right to property.#Case C-234/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 January 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0238decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 27 January 2022.#'Sātiņi-S' SIA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 17 – Right to property – Directive 2009/147/EC – Compensation for the damage caused to aquaculture by protected wild birds in a Natura 2000 area – Compensation less than the damage actually suffered – Article 107(1) TFEU – State aid – Concept of ‘advantage’ – Conditions – Regulation (EU) No 717/2014 – De minimis rule.#Case C-238/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 January 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0788decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 27 January 2022.#European Commission v Kingdom of Spain.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Free movement of capital – Obligation to provide information concerning assets or rights held in other Member States of the European Union or the European Economic Area (EEA) – Failure to comply with that obligation – Limitation – Penalties.#Case C-788/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 January 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0325decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 January 2022.#Unger Marketing International LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Design representing a water purifier – Ground for invalidity – Non-compliance with requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function – Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Declaration of invalidity.#Case T-325/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 January 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0498decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 January 2022.#Diego Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató Kft. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark WOOD STEP LAMINATE FLOORING – Earlier international word mark STEP – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Free movement of goods.#Case T-498/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 January 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0498_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 January 2022.#Diego Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató Kft. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark WOOD STEP LAMINATE FLOORING – Earlier international word mark STEP – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Free movement of goods.#Case T-498/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 January 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0325_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 January 2022.#Unger Marketing International LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Design representing a water purifier – Ground for invalidity – Non-compliance with requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function – Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Declaration of invalidity.#Case T-325/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 January 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0638_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 25 January 2022.#European Commission v European Food SA and Others.#Appeal – State aid – Articles 107 and 108 TFEU – Bilateral Investment Treaty – Arbitration clause – Romania – Accession to the European Union – Repeal of a tax incentives scheme prior to accession – Arbitral award granting payment of damages after accession – European Commission decision declaring that payment to be State aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery – Competence of the European Commission – Application ratione temporis of EU law – Determination of the date at which the right to receive aid is conferred on the beneficiary – Article 19 TEU – Articles 267 and 344 TFEU – Autonomy of EU law.#Case C-638/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 January 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0638decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 25 January 2022.#European Commission v European Food SA and Others.#Appeal – State aid – Articles 107 and 108 TFEU – Bilateral Investment Treaty – Arbitration clause – Romania – Accession to the European Union – Repeal of a tax incentives scheme prior to accession – Arbitral award granting payment of damages after accession – European Commission decision declaring that payment to be State aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery – Competence of the European Commission – Application ratione temporis of EU law – Determination of the date at which the right to receive aid is conferred on the beneficiary – Article 19 TEU – Articles 267 and 344 TFEU – Autonomy of EU law.#Case C-638/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 January 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0432_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 January 2022.#ZK.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Immigration policy – Directive 2003/109/EC – Article 9(1)(c) – Loss of the status of long-term resident third-country national – Absence from the territory of the European Union for a period of 12 consecutive months – Interruption of that period of absence – Irregular and short‑term stays in the territory of the European Union.#Case C-432/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 January 2022

Report· CCCELEX 62020CC0037decided

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 20 January 2022.#WM and Sovim SA v Luxembourg Business Registers.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal d'arrondissement de Luxembourg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing – Directive (EU) 2018/843 amending Directive (EU) 2015/849 – Amendment to Article 30(5), first subparagraph, point (c), of Directive 2015/849 – Access for any member of the general public to the information on beneficial ownership – Validity – Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Respect for private and family life – Protection of personal data.#Joined Cases C-37/20 and C-601/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 January 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0432decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 January 2022.#ZK.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wien.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Immigration policy – Directive 2003/109/EC – Article 9(1)(c) – Loss of the status of long-term resident third-country national – Absence from the territory of the European Union for a period of 12 consecutive months – Interruption of that period of absence – Irregular and short‑term stays in the territory of the European Union.#Case C-432/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 January 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0483decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 19 January 2022.#Tecnica Group SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU three-dimensional mark – Shape of a boot – Declaration of partial invalidity – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Decisions of EU trade mark courts ruling on an action for a declaration of non-infringement – Res judicata.#Case T-483/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 January 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0099_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 January 2022.#Construcciones EElectromecánicas Sabero, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Heras Bareche – Earlier EU figurative mark MAGDALENAS DeLasHeras – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-99/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 January 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0076decided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 January 2022.#Masterbuilders, Heiermann, Schmidtmann GbR v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark POMODORO – Genuine use of the trade mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Statement setting out the grounds of appeal – Period for lodging – Article 58(3) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Facts or evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation 2018/625 – Proof of genuine use.#Case T-76/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 January 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0076_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 January 2022.#Masterbuilders, Heiermann, Schmidtmann GbR v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark POMODORO – Genuine use of the trade mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Statement setting out the grounds of appeal – Period for lodging – Article 58(3) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Facts or evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation 2018/625 – Proof of genuine use.#Case T-76/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 January 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0099decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 January 2022.#Construcciones EElectromecánicas Sabero, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Heras Bareche – Earlier EU figurative mark MAGDALENAS DeLasHeras – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-99/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 January 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0483_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 19 January 2022.#Tecnica Group SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU three-dimensional mark – Shape of a boot – Declaration of partial invalidity – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Decisions of EU trade mark courts ruling on an action for a declaration of non-infringement – Res judicata.#Case T-483/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 January 2022

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0599_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 17 January 2022.#AM.VI. Srl and Quinam Limited v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-599/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 January 2022

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0599decided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 17 January 2022.#AM.VI. Srl and Quinam Limited v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-599/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 January 2022

Proposal· PCCELEX 52022PC0010open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the 225th session of the Council of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) as regards the envisaged adoption of Amendment 178 to Annex 1, Amendment 47 to Annex 6 Part I, Amendment 40 to Annex 6 Part II, Amendment 24 to Annex 6 Part III, Amendment 7 to Annex 7, Amendment 109 to Annex 8, Amendment 91 to Annex 10, Vol IV, Amendment 17 to Annex 14, Vol I, Amendment 18 to Annex 17 and Amendment 29 to Annex 9 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation

European Union · European Commission · 17 January 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0514_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 January 2022.#DS v Koch Personaldienstleistungen GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 31(2) – Directive 2003/88/EC – Organisation of working time – Article 7 – Annual leave – Working time – Overtime – Calculation of working time on a monthly basis – No overtime pay when taking annual leave.#Case C-514/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 January 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0363_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 January 2022.#MARCAS MC Szolgáltató Zrt. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Companies – Corporation tax – Tax inspection – Scope of EU law – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 51(1) – Implementation of EU law – None – Fourth Directive 78/660/EEC – Annual accounts of certain types of companies – Accounting of income generated from intellectual property rights – Article 2(3) – Principle that a true and fair view must be given – Article 31 – Valuation of items shown in annual accounts – Compliance with accounting principles.#Case C-363/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 January 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0055_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 13 January 2022.#Minister Sprawiedliwości v Prokurator Krajowy – Pierwszy Zastępca Prokuratora Generalnego and Rzecznik Dyscyplinarny Izby Adwokackiej w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Admissibility – Article 267 TFEU – Definition of ‘court or tribunal of a Member State’ – Bar Association Disciplinary Court – Disciplinary investigation initiated against a lawyer – Decision of the Disciplinary Agent finding that there was no disciplinary offence and terminating the investigation – Appeal by the Minister for Justice to the Bar Association Disciplinary Court – Directive 2006/123/EC – Services in the internal market – Article 4, point (6), and Article 10(6) – Authorisation scheme – Withdrawal of authorisation – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Not applicable.#Case C-55/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 January 2022

PreviousPage 28 of 29Next