Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

1,484 records in EU in 2024

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773France · 7,181Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 780Austria · 331Germany · 305United States · 141Belgium · 1Estonia · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0061decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 17 January 2024.#Ona Investigación, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark BIOPÔLE – Earlier national word mark AGUA BIOPOLAR – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-61/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 January 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0060decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 17 January 2024.#Ilovepdf, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark ILOVEPDF – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Legitimate expectations – Equal treatment.#Case T-60/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 January 2024

Proposal· PCCELEX 52024PC0011open

Recommendation for a COUNCIL DECISION to authorise the Commission to open negotiations for the amendment of the five agreements on the automatic exchange of financial account information to improve international tax compliance between the European Union and, respectively, the Swiss Confederation, the Principality of Liechtenstein, the Principality of Andorra, the Principality of Monaco and the Republic of San Marino

European Union · European Commission · 17 January 2024

Decision· DCELEX 32024D0412in force

Council Decision (EU) 2024/412 of 16 January 2024 on the signing, on behalf of the Union, and provisional application of the Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an Association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Arab Republic of Egypt, of the other part, on a Framework Agreement between the European Union and the Arab Republic of Egypt on the general principles for the participation of the Arab Republic of Egypt in Union programmes

European Union · EUR-Lex · 16 January 2024

Decision· DCELEX 32024D0375in force

Council Decision (EU) 2024/375 of 16 January 2024 on the conclusion of the Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Interim Association Agreement on trade and cooperation between the European Community, of the one part, and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) for the benefit of the Palestinian Authority of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, of the other part, on a Framework Agreement between the European Union and the Palestinian Authority of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip on the general principles for its participation in Union programmes

European Union · EUR-Lex · 16 January 2024

Proposal· PCCELEX 52024PC0005open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the EPA Committee established under the interim agreement with a view to an Economic Partnership Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Central Africa Party, of the other part, as regards the adoption of the Protocol concerning the definition of the concept of ‘originating products’ and methods of administrative cooperation

European Union · European Commission · 12 January 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0524_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 January 2024.#Amer Foz v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted against Syria – Measures directed against persons associated with persons and entities subject to restrictive measures – Lists of persons subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Proof that inclusion of the appellant’s name on those lists is well founded.#Case C-524/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 January 2024

Report· CCCELEX 62022CC0632decided

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 11 January 2024.#AB Volvo v Transsaqui S.L.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 – Service of judicial and extrajudicial documents – Action for compensation for damage caused by a practice prohibited by Article 101(1) TFEU and by Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area – Document instituting proceedings served at the seat of a subsidiary of the defendant – Validity of the writ of summons – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 – Right to effective judicial protection.#Case C-632/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 January 2024

Report· CCCELEX 62021CC0814decided

Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 11 January 2024.#European Commission v Republic of Poland.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 20 TFEU – Citizenship of the Union – Article 21 TFEU – Right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States – Article 22 TFEU – Right to vote and to stand as a candidate in municipal and European Parliament elections in the Member State of residence under the same conditions as nationals of that State – Citizens of the Union residing in a Member State of which they are not nationals – No right to be a member of a political party – Articles 2 and 10 TEU – Democratic principle – Article 4(2) TEU – Respect for the national identity of the Member States – Article 12 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Role of political parties in expressing the will of citizens of the Union.#Case C-814/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 January 2024

Report· CCCELEX 62020CC0725decided

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 11 January 2024.#Maria Teresa Coppo Gavazzi and Others v European Parliament.#Appeal – Law governing the institutions – Single Statute for Members of the European Parliament – Members of the European Parliament elected in Italian constituencies – Adoption by the Italian Chamber of Deputies of a decision on pensions – Change in the amounts of the pensions of members of the Italian Parliament – Corresponding change, by the European Parliament, in the amounts of the pensions of certain former Members of the European Parliament elected in Italy – Replacement of the decisions of the Parliament – Continuing interest in bringing proceedings for annulment of the judgment of the General Court of the European Union.#Case C-725/20 P.#Giacomo Santini and Others v European Parliament.#Appeal – Law governing the institutions – Single Statute for Members of the European Parliament – Members of the European Parliament elected in Italian constituencies – Adoption by the Italian Chamber of Deputies of a decision on pensions – Change in the amounts of the pensions of members of the Italian Parliament – Corresponding change, by the European Parliament, in the amounts of the pensions of certain former Members of the European Parliament elected in Italy – Replacement of the decisions of the Parliament – Continuing interest in bringing proceedings for annulment of the judgment of the General Court of the European Union.#Case C-198/21 P.#Enrico Falqui v European Parliament.#Appeal – Law governing the institutions – Single Statute for Members of the European Parliament – Members of the European Parliament elected in Italian constituencies – Adoption by the Italian Chamber of Deputies of a decision on pensions – Change in the amounts of the pensions of members of the Italian Parliament – Corresponding change, by the European Parliament, in the amount of the pension of a former Member of the European Parliament elected in Italy – Withdrawal and replacement of the decisions of the Parliament – Continuing interest in bringing proceedings for annulment of the judgment of the General Court of the European Union.#Case C-391/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 January 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0363decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 January 2024.#Planistat Europe and Hervé-Patrick Charlot v European Commission.#Appeal – Second paragraph of Article 340 TFEU – Non-contractual liability of the European Union – Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 – Investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) – External investigation by OLAF – ‘Eurostat’ case – Forwarding by OLAF of information concerning matters liable to result in criminal proceedings to the national judicial authorities before the conclusion of the investigation – Filing of a complaint by the European Commission before the conclusion of the OLAF investigation – National criminal proceedings – Ruling that there is no need to adjudicate which has become final – Concept of a ‘sufficiently serious breach’ of a rule of EU law intended to confer rights on individuals – Material and non-material damage allegedly suffered by the appellants – Actions for damages.#Case C-363/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 January 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0111decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 January 2024.#Helene Hamers v European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop).#Appeal – Civil service – Official – Investigation by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) – National criminal proceedings – National decision to acquit the appellant – Damage allegedly sustained as a result of the unlawful conduct of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) during the national criminal proceedings – Rejection of the claim for damages brought by the appellant – Action for annulment and for damages – Article 41(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Requirement of impartiality – Conflict of interests – Article 48(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Presumption of innocence – Principle of sincere cooperation – Annulment of the contested decision in part.#Case C-111/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 January 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0524decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 January 2024.#Amer Foz v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted against Syria – Measures directed against persons associated with persons and entities subject to restrictive measures – Lists of persons subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Proof that inclusion of the appellant’s name on those lists is well founded.#Case C-524/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 January 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0122decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 January 2024.#Dyson Ltd and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Energy – Directive 2010/30/EU – Indication by labelling and standard product information of the consumption of energy and other resources by energy-related products – Delegated regulation of the European Commission supplementing that directive – Energy labelling of vacuum cleaners – Annulment – Actions for damages – Non-contractual liability of the European Union – Requirement of a sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – Manifest and grave disregard for the limits of discretion – Relevant factors in the case of the absence of any discretion.#Case C-122/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 January 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0122_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 January 2024.#Dyson Ltd and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Energy – Directive 2010/30/EU – Indication by labelling and standard product information of the consumption of energy and other resources by energy-related products – Delegated regulation of the European Commission supplementing that directive – Energy labelling of vacuum cleaners – Annulment – Actions for damages – Non-contractual liability of the European Union – Requirement of a sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – Manifest and grave disregard for the limits of discretion – Relevant factors in the case of the absence of any discretion.#Case C-122/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 January 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0363_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 January 2024.#Planistat Europe and Hervé-Patrick Charlot v European Commission.#Appeal – Second paragraph of Article 340 TFEU – Non-contractual liability of the European Union – Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 – Investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) – External investigation by OLAF – ‘Eurostat’ case – Forwarding by OLAF of information concerning matters liable to result in criminal proceedings to the national judicial authorities before the conclusion of the investigation – Filing of a complaint by the European Commission before the conclusion of the OLAF investigation – National criminal proceedings – Ruling that there is no need to adjudicate which has become final – Concept of a ‘sufficiently serious breach’ of a rule of EU law intended to confer rights on individuals – Material and non-material damage allegedly suffered by the appellants – Actions for damages.#Case C-363/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 January 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0111_INFdecided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 January 2024.#Helene Hamers v European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop).#Appeal – Civil service – Official – Investigation by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) – National criminal proceedings – National decision to acquit the appellant – Damage allegedly sustained as a result of the unlawful conduct of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) during the national criminal proceedings – Rejection of the claim for damages brought by the appellant – Action for annulment and for damages – Article 41(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Requirement of impartiality – Conflict of interests – Article 48(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Presumption of innocence – Principle of sincere cooperation – Annulment of the contested decision in part.#Case C-111/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 January 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0504_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 January 2024.#Levantur, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative trade mark Fantasia BAHIA PRINCIPE HOTELS & RESORTS – Earlier national trade name FANTASIA HOTELES – Relative ground for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Case T-504/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 January 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0505_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 January 2024.#Levantur, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative trade mark LUXURY BAHIA PRINCIPE FANTASIA Don Pablo Collection – Earlier national trade name FANTASIA HOTELES – Relative ground for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(4) and Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Case T-505/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 January 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0505decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 January 2024.#Levantur, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative trade mark LUXURY BAHIA PRINCIPE FANTASIA Don Pablo Collection – Earlier national trade name FANTASIA HOTELES – Relative ground for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(4) and Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Case T-505/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 January 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0504decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 January 2024.#Levantur, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative trade mark Fantasia BAHIA PRINCIPE HOTELS & RESORTS – Earlier national trade name FANTASIA HOTELES – Relative ground for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Case T-504/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 January 2024

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0075_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 January 2024.#Criminal proceedings against M.A.sr and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Acte éclairé – Identical questions – Protection of the financial interests of the European Union – Article 325(1) TFEU – PFI Convention – Article 2(1) – Obligation to counter fraud affecting the financial interests of the European Union by taking effective deterrent measures – Obligation to provide for criminal penalties – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Serious VAT fraud – Limitation period for criminal liability – Judgment of a constitutional court which had invalidated a national provision governing the reasons for interrupting that period – Systemic risk of impunity – Protection of fundamental rights – Article 49(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle that offences and penalties must be defined by law – Requirements of foreseeability and precision of criminal law – Principle of the retroactive application of the more lenient criminal law (lex mitior) – Principle of legal certainty – National standard of protection of fundamental rights – Duty on the courts of a Member State to disapply judgments of the constitutional court and/or the supreme court of that Member State in the event that they are incompatible with EU law – Disciplinary liability of judges in the event of non-compliance with those judgments – Principle of the primacy of EU law.#Case C-75/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 January 2024

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0075decided

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 January 2024.#Criminal proceedings against M.A.sr and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Braşov.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Acte éclairé – Identical questions – Protection of the financial interests of the European Union – Article 325(1) TFEU – PFI Convention – Article 2(1) – Obligation to counter fraud affecting the financial interests of the European Union by taking effective deterrent measures – Obligation to provide for criminal penalties – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Serious VAT fraud – Limitation period for criminal liability – Judgment of a constitutional court which had invalidated a national provision governing the reasons for interrupting that period – Systemic risk of impunity – Protection of fundamental rights – Article 49(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle that offences and penalties must be defined by law – Requirements of foreseeability and precision of criminal law – Principle of the retroactive application of the more lenient criminal law (lex mitior) – Principle of legal certainty – National standard of protection of fundamental rights – Duty on the courts of a Member State to disapply judgments of the constitutional court and/or the supreme court of that Member State in the event that they are incompatible with EU law – Disciplinary liability of judges in the event of non-compliance with those judgments – Principle of the primacy of EU law.#Case C-75/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 January 2024

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0611_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 9 January 2024.#Yayla Türk Lebensmittelvertrieb GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-611/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 January 2024

PreviousPage 30 of 30