United States · Bill · HR
H.R. 1115 (108th)
Class Action Fairness Act of 2003
Introduced
6 March 2003
Last action
12 June 2003 · Floor
Status
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Sponsors
Rep. Goodlatte, Bob [R-VA-6], Rep. Boucher, Rick [D-VA-9], Rep. Sensenbrenner, F. James, Jr. [R-WI-5], Rep. Moran, James P. [D-VA-8], Rep. Smith, Lamar [R-TX-21], Rep. Stenholm, Charles W. [D-TX-17], Rep. DeLay, Tom [R-TX-22], Rep. Dooley, Calvin M. [D-CA-20], Rep. Hyde, Henry J. [R-IL-6], Rep. Holden, Tim [D-PA-17], Rep. Cox, Christopher [R-CA-48], Rep. Cramer, Robert E. (Bud), Jr. [D-AL-5], Rep. Rogers, Mike J. [R-MI-8], Sen. Flake, Jeff [R-AZ], Rep. Emanuel, Rahm [D-IL-5], Rep. Shays, Christopher [R-CT-4], Rep. Hostettler, John N. [R-IN-8], David Scott, Rep. Chocola, Chris [R-IN-2], Rep. Chabot, Steve [R-OH-1], Rep. McHugh, John M. [R-NY-23], Rep. Northup, Anne M. [R-KY-3], Rep. Coble, Howard [R-NC-6], Rep. Cunningham, Randy (Duke) [R-CA-50], Rep. Cannon, Chris [R-UT-3], Rep. Hart, Melissa A. [R-PA-4], Rep. Barrett, J. Gresham [R-SC-3], Rep. Baker, Richard H. [R-LA-6], Rep. Feeney, Tom [R-FL-24], Rep. Keller, Ric [R-FL-8], Rep. Pence, Mike [R-IN-6], Rep. Gallegly, Elton [R-CA-24], Rep. Forbes, J. Randy [R-VA-4], Rep. Miller, Jeff [R-FL-1], Rep. Burgess, Michael C. [R-TX-26], Rep. Bradley, Jeb [R-NH-1], Sen. Wicker, Roger F. [R-MS], Rep. Goode, Virgil H., Jr. [R-VA-5], Rep. Biggert, Judy [R-IL-13], Rep. Franks, Trent [R-AZ-8], Rep. Kennedy, Mark R. [R-MN-6], Rep. Sessions, Pete [R-TX-17], Rep. Osborne, Tom [R-NE-3], Sen. DeMint, Jim [R-SC], Rep. Souder, Mark E. [R-IN-3], Rep. Schrock, Edward L. [R-VA-2], Rep. Hensarling, Jeb [R-TX-5], Rep. Putnam, Adam H. [R-FL-12]
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
10 August 2026
Summary
Class Action Fairness Act of 2003 - Establishes a consumer class action bill of rights, including provision for: (1) judicial review and approval of noncash settlements; (2) protection against loss by class members because of payments to class counsel; (3) a prohibition against court approval of a proposed settlement providing for greater payments to class members because they are located in closer geographic proximity to the court; (4) a prohibition against court approval of a proposed settlement providing for payment of a greater share of the award to a class representative serving on behalf of a class; and (5) standardized settlement notification information. Grants the district courts original jurisdiction of any civil action in which the matter in controversy exceeds $2 million, exclusive of interest and costs, and is a class action in which any member of a class of plaintiffs is: (1) a citizen of a State different from any defendant; (2) a foreign state or a citizen or subject of a foreign state and any defendant is a citizen of a State; or (3) a citizen of a State and any defendant is a foreign state or a citizen or subject of a foreign state. Lists exceptions. Sets forth procedures for removal of interstate class actions to U.S. district court and for review of orders remanding class actions to State courts. Grants the courts of appeals jurisdiction of appeals from orders of the U.S. district courts granting or denying class certification under rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure under specified circumstances.
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
6 March 2003
Introduced
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Source: IntroReferral
6 March 2003
Introduced
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E405-406)
Source: IntroReferral
6 March 2003
Introduced
Introduced in House
Source: IntroReferral
6 March 2003
Introduced
Introduced in House
Source: IntroReferral
15 May 2003
Committee
Committee Hearings Held.
Source: Committee
21 May 2003
Vote
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 20 - 14.
Source: Committee
21 May 2003
Committee
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Source: Committee
9 June 2003
Calendars
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 73.
Source: Calendars
9 June 2003
Reported
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 108-144.
Source: Committee
9 June 2003
Reported
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 108-144.
Source: Committee
11 June 2003
Reported
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 269 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 1115 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on the Judiciary now printed in the bill. Measure will be considered read. Specified amendments are in order.
Source: Floor
12 June 2003
Floor
The Speaker designated the Honorable Steven C. LaTourette to act as Chairman of the Committee.
Source: Floor
12 June 2003
Floor
House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 269 and Rule XXIII.
Source: Floor
12 June 2003
Floor
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 269. (consideration: CR H5271-5307)
Source: Floor
12 June 2003
Passed
Rule H. Res. 269 passed House.
Source: Floor
12 June 2003
Floor
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
Source: Floor
12 June 2003
Floor
The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 1115.
Source: Floor
12 June 2003
Introduced
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Source: IntroReferral
12 June 2003
Passed
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Source: Floor
12 June 2003
Vote
On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 253 - 170 (Roll no. 272).
Source: Floor
12 June 2003
Vote
Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 253 - 170 (Roll no. 272).
Source: Floor
12 June 2003
Vote
On motion to recommit with instructions Failed by recorded vote: 185 - 240 (Roll no. 271).
Source: Floor
12 June 2003
Floor
The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection.
Source: Floor
12 June 2003
Floor
Mr. Weiner moved to recommit with instructions to Judiciary. (consideration: CR H5405-5406; text: CR H5305)
Source: Floor
12 June 2003
Passed
The House adopted the amendment in the nature of a substitute as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
Source: Floor
12 June 2003
Floor
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 1115 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on the Judiciary now printed in the bill. Measure will be considered read. Specified amendments are in order.
Source: Floor
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
- Engrossed in House · 12 June 2003 · Download file
- Referred in Senate · 12 June 2003 · Download file
- Reported in House · 9 June 2003 · Download file
- Introduced in House · 6 March 2003 · Download file
Documents
11 official files
Referred in Senate (text)
This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
Referred in Senate (text)
Referred in Senate · EN · 12 June 2003
Referred in Senate (PDF)
Referred in Senate · EN · 12 June 2003
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
Engrossed in House (text)
Engrossed in House · EN · 12 June 2003
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
Engrossed in House (PDF)
Engrossed in House · EN · 12 June 2003
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
Passed House amended
summary · EN · 12 June 2003
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
Reported in House (text)
Reported in House · EN · 9 June 2003
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
Reported in House (PDF)
Reported in House · EN · 9 June 2003
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
Reported to House with amendment(s)
summary · EN · 9 June 2003
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
Introduced in House (text)
Introduced in House · EN · 6 March 2003
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
Introduced in House (PDF)
Introduced in House · EN · 6 March 2003
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
Introduced in House
summary · EN · 6 March 2003
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
Sponsors
- Rep. Goodlatte, Bob [R-VA-6] · R · Sponsor
- Rep. Boucher, Rick [D-VA-9] · D · Sponsor
- Rep. Sensenbrenner, F. James, Jr. [R-WI-5] · R · Sponsor
- Rep. Moran, James P. [D-VA-8] · D · Sponsor
- Rep. Smith, Lamar [R-TX-21] · R · Sponsor
- Rep. Stenholm, Charles W. [D-TX-17] · D · Sponsor
- Rep. DeLay, Tom [R-TX-22] · R · Sponsor
- Rep. Dooley, Calvin M. [D-CA-20] · D · Sponsor
- Rep. Hyde, Henry J. [R-IL-6] · R · Sponsor
- Rep. Holden, Tim [D-PA-17] · D · Sponsor
- Rep. Cox, Christopher [R-CA-48] · R · Sponsor
- Rep. Cramer, Robert E. (Bud), Jr. [D-AL-5] · D · Sponsor
- Rep. Rogers, Mike J. [R-MI-8] · R · Cosponsor
- Sen. Flake, Jeff [R-AZ] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Emanuel, Rahm [D-IL-5] · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. Shays, Christopher [R-CT-4] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Hostettler, John N. [R-IN-8] · R · Cosponsor
- David Scott · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. Chocola, Chris [R-IN-2] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Chabot, Steve [R-OH-1] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. McHugh, John M. [R-NY-23] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Northup, Anne M. [R-KY-3] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Coble, Howard [R-NC-6] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Cunningham, Randy (Duke) [R-CA-50] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Cannon, Chris [R-UT-3] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Hart, Melissa A. [R-PA-4] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Barrett, J. Gresham [R-SC-3] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Baker, Richard H. [R-LA-6] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Feeney, Tom [R-FL-24] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Keller, Ric [R-FL-8] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Pence, Mike [R-IN-6] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Gallegly, Elton [R-CA-24] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Forbes, J. Randy [R-VA-4] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Miller, Jeff [R-FL-1] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Burgess, Michael C. [R-TX-26] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Bradley, Jeb [R-NH-1] · R · Cosponsor
- Sen. Wicker, Roger F. [R-MS] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Goode, Virgil H., Jr. [R-VA-5] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Biggert, Judy [R-IL-13] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Franks, Trent [R-AZ-8] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Kennedy, Mark R. [R-MN-6] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Sessions, Pete [R-TX-17] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Osborne, Tom [R-NE-3] · R · Cosponsor
- Sen. DeMint, Jim [R-SC] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Souder, Mark E. [R-IN-3] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Schrock, Edward L. [R-VA-2] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Hensarling, Jeb [R-TX-5] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Putnam, Adam H. [R-FL-12] · R · Cosponsor
Showing 48 of 53 sponsors and actors.
Related records
- related to → Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1115) to amend the procedures that apply to consideration of interstate class actions to assure fairer outcomes for class members and defendants, to outlaw certain practices that provide inadequate settlements for class members, to assure that attorneys do not receive a disproportionate amount of settlements at the expense of class members, to provide for clearer and simpler information in class action settlement notices, to assure prompt consideration of interstate class actions, to amend title 28, United States Code, to allow the application of the principles of Federal diversity jurisdiction to interstate class actions, and for other purposes.
- related to ← Class Action Fairness Act of 2003
- related to ← Class Action Fairness Act of 2003
- related to ← Class Action Fairness Act of 2004
- amends ← Amendment in the nature of a substitute.
- amends ← An amendment numbered 1 printed in House Report 108-148, to slightly broaden the category of class action cases that would remain in state court in two ways. First, this amendment raises the aggregate amount in controversy required for federal court jurisdiction from $2 million to $5 million. Second, it allow federal courts discretion to return intrastate class actions in which local law governs to state courts after weighing five factors to determine if the case is appropriately of a local character. This discretion would come into play when between one-third and two-thirds of the plaintiffs are citizens of the same state as the primary defendants. If less than one-third are citizens of the same state, the case would automatically be eligible for federal court jurisdiction under the new diversity rules in this bill. Likewise, if more than two-thirds are citizens of the same state, the case would not be subject to the new rules in this bill and would remain in state court.
- amends ← An amendment in the nature of a substitute numbered 4 printed in House Report 108-148. Section 1 of the amendment contains a short title, reference, and table of contents. Section 2 establishes improved procedures for certain class actions, including provisions for the use of coupon settlements, court approval of settlements, sealing of class action documents, and interlocutory appeals. Section 3 enacts the recommendations of the U. S. Judicial Conference with respect to notice to class members. Section 4 establishes a state court multi-district litigation panel for class actions. The panel allows for the consolidation of class actions pending in different state courts for pretrial proceedings. Section 5 of the amendment authorizes the National Center for State Courts to develop and implement a procedure by which state courts or the state court multi-district litigation panel may transfer certain class actions to federal courts.
- amends ← An amendment numbered 2 printed in House Report 108-148 to prevent domestic corporations from not being subject to the jurisdiction of U.S. Federal Courts, and liability in class action lawsuits filed in Federal Courts, through mergers or repatriations with foreign companies.
- amends ← An amendment numbered 3 printed in House Report 108-148 to preserve the ability of local prosecutors to enforce state antitrust and consumer protection laws in state courts.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.congress.gov/bill/108th-congress/house-bill/1115
- Open data entity: https://api.congress.gov/v3/bill/108/hr/1115
- us · 108-hr-1115 · source updated 10 August 2026