PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HR

H.R. 2393 (109th)

Frivolous Lawsuit Reduction Act

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

17 May 2005

Last action

17 May 2005 · Introduced

Status

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Sponsors

Rep. Chocola, Chris [R-IN-2], Rep. Bartlett, Roscoe G. [R-MD-6], Rep. Brown-Waite, Ginny [R-FL-5], Ken Calvert, Rep. Kelly, Sue W. [R-NY-19], Rep. Kennedy, Mark R. [R-MN-6], Rep. Kline, John [R-MN-2], Rep. Mack, Connie [R-FL-14], Rep. McCaul, Michael T. [R-TX-10], Rep. Miller, Jeff [R-FL-1], Rep. Musgrave, Marilyn N. [R-CO-4], Rep. Myrick, Sue Wilkins [R-NC-9], Rep. Neugebauer, Randy [R-TX-19], Rep. Norwood, Charles W. [R-GA-10], Rep. Paul, Ron [R-TX-22], Rep. Souder, Mark E. [R-IN-3], Michael Turner, Rep. Cubin, Barbara [R-WY-At Large], Rep. Tiahrt, Todd [R-KS-4]

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

15 August 2025

Summary

Frivolous Lawsuit Reduction Act - Amends the Federal judicial code to authorize parties in civil diversity litigation to serve written settlement offers on an adverse party at any time not less than 10 days before trial. Authorizes the court, at any time before judgment is entered, to exempt from settlement any claim that presents a novel and important question of law or fact that substantially affects nonparties. Voids all settlement offers made by the parties with respect to such exempted claims. Authorizes an offeror whose proposed settlement was declined by an offeree to file a petition with the court seeking payment by the offeree of costs and fees, including attorney's fees, from the date of the last settlement offer by either party if the ultimate judgment or order is not more favorable to the offeree than the proposed settlement. Requires the court to order payment by the offeree in such circumstances unless requiring payment would be manifestly unjust. Limits attorney's fees ordered under this Act to: (1) the actual attorney's fees incurred by the offeree in connection with the claim; or (2) if no such cost was incurred due to a contingency fee agreement, a reasonable cost that would have been incurred by the offeree absent a contingency fee agreement. States that this Act does not apply to claims seeking equitable remedies.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 17 May 2005

    Introduced

    Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 17 May 2005

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 17 May 2005

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Introduced in House (text)

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.