PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HR

H.R. 2780 (104th)

To specify the circumstances in which compensation may or may not be afforded to Federal and District of Columbia employees for the period of a lapse in appropriations for fiscal year 1996.

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

14 December 1995

Last action

18 December 1995 · Referred

Status

Referred to the Subcommittee on Civil Service.

Sponsors

Rep. Burton, Dan [R-IN-6], Rep. Moran, James P. [D-VA-8], Rep. Mica, John L. [R-FL-7], JOE BARTON, Rep. Davis, Tom [R-VA-11], Rep. Gillmor, Paul E. [R-OH-5]

Subjects

Taxation

Source updated

7 April 2025

Taxation

Summary

Declares that any officer or employee of the U.S. Government or of the District of Columbia (D.C.) government who is permitted or required to serve during the period of any lapse in appropriations for the officer's or employee's agency shall be compensated at the standard rate for such period. Declares that any U.S. or D.C. officer or employee furloughed during any such period shall not be entitled to basic pay with respect to any portion of such period, except that any such person willing and able to serve during the period shall be permitted to serve, and shall be compensated accordingly.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 14 December 1995

    Introduced

    Referred to the House Committee on Government Reform and Oversight.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 14 December 1995

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 14 December 1995

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 18 December 1995

    Referred

    Referred to the Subcommittee on Civil Service.

    Source: Committee

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Introduced in House (text)

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.