Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · S

S. 429 (102nd)

Consumer Protection Against Price-Fixing Act of 1991

passedUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

20 February 1991

Last action

30 June 1992 · ResolvingDifferences

Status

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Sponsors

Sen. Metzenbaum, Howard M. [D-OH], Sen. Rudman, Warren [R-NH], Sen. Biden, Joseph R., Jr. [D-DE], Sen. Gorton, Slade [R-WA], Sen. Simon, Paul [D-IL], Sen. D'Amato, Alfonse [R-NY], Sen. Bentsen, Lloyd M. [D-TX], Sen. Bradley, Bill [D-NJ], Sen. Murkowski, Frank H. [R-AK], Sen. Sasser, Jim [D-TN], Sen. Cranston, Alan [D-CA], Sen. Robb, Charles S. [D-VA], Sen. Graham, Bob [D-FL], Sen. Inouye, Daniel K. [D-HI], Sen. Shelby, Richard C. [R-AL], Sen. Kohl, Herb [D-WI], Sen. Exon, J. James [D-NE], Sen. Lautenberg, Frank R. [D-NJ], Sen. Kerry, John F. [D-MA], Sen. Pell, Claiborne [D-RI], Sen. Kennedy, Edward M. [D-MA], Sen. Levin, Carl [D-MI], Sen. Moynihan, Daniel Patrick [D-NY], Sen. Bingaman, Jeff [D-NM], Sen. Adams, Brock [D-WA], Sen. Lieberman, Joseph I. [ID-CT], Sen. Dodd, Christopher J. [D-CT], Sen. Wirth, Timothy [D-CO], Sen. Akaka, Daniel K. [D-HI], Sen. Burdick, Quentin N. [D-ND], Sen. Harkin, Tom [D-IA], Sen. Wellstone, Paul D. [D-MN]

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

10 August 2026

Summary

Consumer Protection Against Price-Fixing Act of 1991 - Amends the Sherman Act to set forth evidentiary standards for price-fixing actions. Requires the court to allow the issue of concerted action to fix prices to be decided by the trier of fact if there is sufficient evidence from which a trier of fact could reasonably conclude that: (1) the supplier of a good or service received from a competitor of a reseller an express or implied suggestion, request, or demand that the supplier take steps to curtail or eliminate price competition; and (2) such communication was the major reason that the supplier terminated sales or supplies to the reseller. Prohibits the court from allowing the trier of fact to consider whether an individual and a competitor engaged in concerted action to set prices in violation of this Act if the court determines that the trier of fact could only find concerted action by making implausible inferences. Provides that the fact that a supplier and a reseller entered into an agreement to establish the resale price of a good or service shall be sufficient to constitute a price fixing violation, except when the agreement is to establish the maximum resale price of a good or service. Specifies that an agreement between the seller and the purchaser of a good or service to terminate another purchaser as a dealer or to refuse to supply such other purchaser because of that purchaser's pricing policies violates this Act, regardless of whether or not a specific price or price level is agreed upon.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 20 February 1991

    Introduced

    Read twice and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 20 February 1991

    Introduced

    Introduced in Senate

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 21 February 1991

    Committee

    Subcommittee on Antitrust, Monopolies and Business. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 102-368.

    Source: Committee

  4. 21 March 1991

    Reported

    Committee on Judiciary. Ordered to be reported without amendment without recommendation.

    Source: Committee

  5. 19 April 1991

    Calendars

    Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 68.

    Source: Calendars

  6. 19 April 1991

    Reported

    Committee on Judiciary. Reported to Senate by Senator Biden under the authority of the order of Apr 18, 91 without recommendation without amendment. With written report No. 102-42.

    Source: Committee

  7. 19 April 1991

    Reported

    Committee on Judiciary. Reported to Senate by Senator Biden under the authority of the order of Apr 18, 91 without recommendation without amendment. With written report No. 102-42.

    Source: Committee

  8. 25 April 1991

    Floor

    Motion to proceed to consideration of measure made in Senate.

    Source: Floor

  9. 6 May 1991

    Floor

    Motion to proceed considered in Senate.

    Source: Floor

  10. 7 May 1991

    Vote

    Cloture on the motion to proceed invoked in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 61-37. Record Vote No: 53.

    Source: Floor

  11. 8 May 1991

    Floor

    Considered by Senate.

    Source: Floor

  12. 9 May 1991

    Floor

    Considered by Senate.

    Source: Floor

  13. 9 May 1991

    Passed

    Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Voice Vote.

    Source: Floor

  14. 14 May 1991

    Floor

    Held at the desk.

    Source: Floor

  15. 14 May 1991

    Floor

    Message on Senate action sent to the House.

    Source: Floor

  16. 14 May 1991

    Floor

    Received in the House.

    Source: Floor

  17. 8 October 1991

    Reported

    Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 241 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 1470 and S. 429 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit. Measure will be read by section. Bill is open to amendments. After passage of H.R. 1470, it shall be in order to take from the Speaker's table the bill S. 429 and to consider said bill in the House. It shall then be in order to move to strike all after the enacting clause of said Senate bill and to insert in lieu thereof the provisions of H.R. 1470 as passed by the House. It shall then be in order to move that the House insist on its amendment to S. 429

    Source: Floor

  18. 10 October 1991

    Floor

    A similar measure H.R. 1470 was laid on the table without objection.

    Source: Floor

  19. 10 October 1991

    Passed

    The title of the measure was amended. Agreed to without objection.

    Source: Floor

  20. 10 October 1991

    Passed

    Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 1470 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit. Measure will be read by section. Bill is open to amendments. After passage of H.R. 1470, it shall be in order to take from the Speaker's table the bill S. 429 and to consider said bill in the House. It shall then be in order to move to strike all after the enacting clause of said Senate bill and to insert in lieu thereof the provisions of H.R. 1470 as passed by the House. It shall then be in order to move that the House insist on its amendment to S. 429

    Source: Floor

  21. 10 October 1991

    ResolvingDifferences

    The Chair appointed conferees: Brooks, Edwards (CA), Synar, Fish, and Campbell (CA).

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  22. 10 October 1991

    Passed

    On motion that the House insist upon its amendments, and request a conference Agreed to by voice vote.

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  23. 10 October 1991

    ResolvingDifferences

    Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 241, the House moved to insist upon its amendments, and request a conference.

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  24. 10 October 1991

    Passed

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    Source: Floor

  25. 10 October 1991

    Passed

    On passage Passed without objection.

    Source: Floor

  26. 10 October 1991

    Passed

    Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed without objection.

    Source: Floor

  27. 10 October 1991

    Passed

    The House struck all after the enacting clause and inserted in lieu thereof the provisions of a similar measure H.R. 1470. Agreed to without objection.

    Source: Floor

  28. 10 October 1991

    Floor

    Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 241.

    Source: Floor

  29. 16 October 1991

    Floor

    Message on House action received in Senate and held at desk: House amendments to Senate bill and House requests a conference.

    Source: Floor

  30. 18 March 1992

    Passed

    Senate agreed to request for conference. Appointed conferees. Biden; Kennedy; Metzenbaum; Thurmond; Hatch.

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  31. 18 March 1992

    Passed

    Senate disagreed to House amendments by Voice Vote.

    Source: Floor

  32. 18 March 1992

    Passed

    Resolving differences -- Senate actions: Senate disagreed to House amendments by Voice Vote.

    Source: NotUsed

  33. 19 March 1992

    Floor

    Message on Senate action sent to the House.

    Source: Floor

  34. 18 June 1992

    Passed

    Conferees agreed to file conference report.

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  35. 18 June 1992

    Passed

    Conference committee actions: Conferees agreed to file conference report.

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  36. 22 June 1992

    ResolvingDifferences

    Conference report H. Rept. 102-605 filed.

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  37. 22 June 1992

    ResolvingDifferences

    Conference report filed: Conference report H. Rept. 102-605 filed.

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  38. 30 June 1992

    Passed

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  39. 30 June 1992

    Vote

    On agreeing to the conference report Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 175 - 225 (Roll no. 251).

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  40. 30 June 1992

    Vote

    Conference report disagreed to in House: On agreeing to the conference report Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 175 - 225 (Roll no. 251).

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  41. 30 June 1992

    ResolvingDifferences

    The previous question was ordered without objection.

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

  42. 30 June 1992

    Floor

    DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on the conference report.

    Source: Floor

  43. 30 June 1992

    ResolvingDifferences

    Mr. Brooks brought up conference report H. Rept. 102-605 for consideration as a privileged matter.

    Source: ResolvingDifferences

Votes

7 May 1991 · Cloture Motion Agreed to · On the Cloture Motion S. 429 · Cloture Motion Agreed to · Official source

Yes 61 · No 37 · Abstain — · Absent/not voting 1

Showing the first 4 recorded positions. Vote totals above are complete.

Versions

Documents

8 official files

Reported to Senate (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Reported to Senate (text)

    Reported to Senate · EN

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Introduced in Senate (text)

    Introduced in Senate · EN

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Engrossed in Senate (text)

    Engrossed in Senate · EN

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Engrossed Amendment House (text)

    Engrossed Amendment House · EN

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Conference report filed in House

    summary · EN · 22 June 1992

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Passed House amended

    summary · EN · 10 October 1991

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Passed Senate amended

    summary · EN · 9 May 1991

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in Senate

    summary · EN · 20 February 1991

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

Showing 10 of 149 related records.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.