United States · Law · HR
H.R. 1058 (104th)
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
Introduced
27 February 1995
Last action
22 December 1995 · Vote
Status
Became Public Law No: 104-67.
Sponsors
Rep. Bliley, Tom [R-VA-3], Rep. Fields, Jack [R-TX-8], Rep. Cox, Christopher [R-CA-40], Rep. Tauzin, W. J. (Billy) [D-LA-3], Rep. Moorhead, Carlos J. [R-CA-22], Rep. Oxley, Michael G. [R-OH-4], Rep. Bilirakis, Michael [R-FL-9], Rep. Schaefer, Dan [R-CO-6], JOE BARTON, Rep. Hastert, J. Dennis [R-IL-14], Rep. Stearns, Cliff [R-FL-6], Rep. Paxon, Bill [R-NY-31], Rep. Gillmor, Paul E. [R-OH-5], Mike Crapo, Rep. Bilbray, Brian P. [R-CA-50], Rep. Ganske, Greg [R-IA-4], Rep. Norwood, Charles W. [R-GA-10], Rep. White, Rick [R-WA-1], Rep. Edwards, Chet [D-TX-17], Rep. Barcia, James A. [D-MI-5], Sen. Coburn, Tom [R-OK], Rep. Klug, Scott L. [R-WI-2], Rep. Frisa, Dan [R-NY-4], Rep. Brewster, Bill K. [D-OK-3]
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
7 April 2025
Summary
Securities Litigation Reform Act - Amends the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, with respect to class actions, to require a court-appointed class action steering committee, composed of class members, to direct counsel for the plaintiff class (plaintiff steering committee). (Sec. 2) Prohibits the use of disgorgement funds resulting from actions brought by the Securities Exchange Commission (the Commission) to pay legal expenses incurred by private parties seeking distribution of such funds. (Sec. 3) Declares that the portion of any final judgment or settlement awarded to class plaintiffs serving as the representative parties shall be equal (on a per share basis) to the portion of the final judgment awarded to all other members of the class. Revises the guidelines for private class action suits to: (1) restrict to five the number of class actions filed by a named plaintiff during any three-year period; (2) subject a losing party litigant, if certain conditions apply, to liability for the prevailing party's legal fees; and (3) require the court to make a conflict of interest determination with respect to a plaintiff's counsel who directly owns or has a beneficial interest in the securities that are the subject of the litigation. Requires a court to require just and equitable security for the payment of awardable fees and expenses from the attorney for the plaintiff class, the plaintiff class, or both. Sets forth disclosure guidelines for any proposed settlement agreement that is disseminated to the plaintiff class, including: (1) a statement about agreement or disagreement on the amount of recoverable damages per share and the likelihood of the plaintiff's prevailing; (2) the amount of legal costs and fees sought as part of the settlement; and (3) the identification of lawyers' representatives who will be available to answer questions from class members. Revises the guidelines for private class action suits to: (1) mandate discharge of a defendant who settles before verdict or judgment from all claims for contribution by nonsettling persons; (2) provide for recovery of contribution by a person who becomes liable for damages from certain non-parties who would have been liable for the same damages, if joined in the original suit; and (3) grant defendants the right to submit to the jury written interrogatories on the issue of each defendant's state of mind (scienter) at the time the alleged violation occurred. Prohibits brokers or dealers from soliciting or accepting referral fees for assisting an attorney in obtaining the representation of a customer in any private action. (Sec. 4) Delineates the requirements for securities fraud actions, including: (1) explicit pleading and proof of scienter; (2) plaintiff's reliance on a material misstatement or omission that proximately caused the plaintiff's loss; and (3) limitations on damages. (Sec. 5) Defines the circumstances ("safe harbor") in which a person shall not be held liable for the publication of predictive statements in any action based on a fraudulent statement under this Act. Permits the defendant in such action to move for an automatic protective order to restrict all discovery to the specific issue of the applicability of the "safe harbor." Directs the Commission to adopt a regulatory framework to implement the "safe harbor" requirements of this Act with respect to predictive statements concerning the future economic performance of an issuer of securities.
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
27 February 1995
Introduced
Referred to the Committee on Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Source: IntroReferral
27 February 1995
Introduced
Referred to the Committee on Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Source: IntroReferral
27 February 1995
Introduced
Introduced in House
Source: IntroReferral
27 February 1995
Introduced
Introduced in House
Source: IntroReferral
3 March 1995
Reported
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 103 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 1058 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered except motion to recommit. Measure will be considered read. Bill is open to amendments. It shall be in order to consider the amendment printed in the reort of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, if offered in the manner specified. All points of order against the amendment for failure to comply with clause 7 of rule XVI shall be waived. The bill shall be considered for amendment under the 5-minute rule, not to exceed 8 hours. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether the amendment to be offered was printed in the Congressional Record.
Source: Floor
6 March 1995
Reported
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 105 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 1058 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit. Measure will be considered read. Bill is open to amendments. the bill shall be considered for amendment under the 5-minute rule, not to exceed 8 hours. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether the amendment to be offered was printed in the Congressional Record. Upon passage H. Res. 103 is laid on the table.
Source: Floor
7 March 1995
Floor
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 1058 as unfinished business.
Source: Floor
7 March 1995
Floor
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 1058 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit. Measure will be considered read. Bill is open to amendments. the bill shall be considered for amendment under the 5-minute rule, not to exceed 8 hours. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether the amendment to be offered was printed in the Congressional Record. Upon passage H. Res. 103 is laid on the table.
Source: Floor
7 March 1995
Floor
The Speaker designated the Honorable Larry Combest to act as Chairman of the Committee.
Source: Floor
7 March 1995
Floor
House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 105 and Rule XXIII.
Source: Floor
7 March 1995
Floor
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 105. (consideration: CR H2760-2779)
Source: Floor
7 March 1995
Passed
Rule H. Res. 105 passed House.
Source: Floor
8 March 1995
Floor
The Clerk was authorized to correct section numbers, punctuation, and cross references, and to make other necessary technical and conforming corrections in the engrossment of H.R. 1058.
Source: Floor
8 March 1995
Passed
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Source: Floor
8 March 1995
Vote
On passage Passed by recorded vote: 325 - 99, 1 Present (Roll no. 216).
Source: Floor
8 March 1995
Vote
Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by recorded vote: 325 - 99, 1 Present (Roll no. 216).
Source: Floor
8 March 1995
Vote
On motion to recommit with instructions Failed by recorded vote: 172 - 251, 1 Present (Roll no. 215). (consideration: CR H2863)
Source: Floor
8 March 1995
Floor
The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection.
Source: Floor
8 March 1995
Floor
DEBATE - The House proceeded with ten minutes of debate on the motion to recommit the bill to the Committee on Commerce with instructions that the Committee report the bill back to the House forthwith with the Manton and Dingell amendments included in the bill.
Source: Floor
8 March 1995
Floor
Mr. Markey moved to recommit with instructions to Commerce.
Source: Floor
8 March 1995
Passed
The House adopted the amendments en gross as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
Source: Floor
8 March 1995
Floor
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
Source: Floor
8 March 1995
Floor
The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 1058.
Source: Floor
8 March 1995
Floor
The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
Source: Floor
8 March 1995
Floor
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H2818-2864)
Source: Floor
10 March 1995
Introduced
Received in the Senate and read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking.
Source: IntroReferral
22 March 1995
Committee
Subcommittee on Securities. Hearings held.
Source: Committee
6 April 1995
Committee
Subcommittee on Securities. Hearings held.
Source: Committee
28 June 1995
Floor
Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S9209-9226)
Source: Floor
28 June 1995
Vote
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate in lieu of S. 240 with an amendment and an amendment to the Title by Yea-Nay Vote. 69-30. Record Vote No: 295.
Source: Floor
28 June 1995
Discharge
Senate Committee on Banking discharged by Unanimous Consent.
Source: Discharge
28 June 1995
Committee
Senate Committee on Banking discharged by Unanimous Consent.
Source: Committee
29 June 1995
Floor
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Source: Floor
24 October 1995
ResolvingDifferences
The Speaker appointed conferees - from the Committee on Commerce for consideration of the House bill, and the Senate amendment, and modifications committed to conference: Bliley, Tauzin, Fields (TX), Cox, White, Dingell, Markey, Bryant (TX), and Eshoo.
Source: ResolvingDifferences
24 October 1995
Passed
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Source: ResolvingDifferences
24 October 1995
Passed
On motion that the House disagree to the Senate amendments, and request a conference Agreed to without objection. (consideration: CR H10690)
Source: ResolvingDifferences
24 October 1995
ResolvingDifferences
Mr. Bliley asked unanimous consent that the House disagree to the Senate amendments, and request a conference.
Source: ResolvingDifferences
25 October 1995
Floor
Message on House action received in Senate and at the desk: House requests a conference.
Source: Floor
17 November 1995
ResolvingDifferences
Senate insists on its amendments agrees to request for a conference, appoints conferees D'Amato; Gramm; Bennett; Grams; Domenici; Sarbanes; Dodd; Kerry; Bryan. (consideration: CR S17361-17362)
Source: ResolvingDifferences
18 November 1995
Floor
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Source: Floor
28 November 1995
ResolvingDifferences
Conference report H. Rept. 104-369 filed. (text of conference report: CR H13692-13699)
Source: ResolvingDifferences
28 November 1995
ResolvingDifferences
Conference report filed: Conference report H. Rept. 104-369 filed.(text of conference report: CR H13692-13699)
Source: ResolvingDifferences
28 November 1995
Passed
Conferees agreed to file conference report.
Source: ResolvingDifferences
28 November 1995
Passed
Conference committee actions: Conferees agreed to file conference report.
Source: ResolvingDifferences
29 November 1995
ResolvingDifferences
Conference papers: Senate report and managers' statement held at the desk in Senate.
Source: ResolvingDifferences
5 December 1995
ResolvingDifferences
Conference report considered in Senate. By Unanimous Consent.
Source: ResolvingDifferences
5 December 1995
Reported
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 290 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of the conference report to H.R. 1058. Waiving all points of ordder against the conference report and against its consideration.
Source: Floor
5 December 1995
Vote
Conference report agreed to in Senate: Senate agreed to conference report by Yea-Nay Vote. 65-30. Record Vote No: 589.(consideration: CR S17997)
Source: ResolvingDifferences
6 December 1995
Vote
On agreeing to the conference report Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 320 - 102, 1 Present (Roll no. 839). (consideration: CR H14039-14055)
Source: ResolvingDifferences
6 December 1995
Passed
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Source: ResolvingDifferences
6 December 1995
Vote
Conference report agreed to in House: On agreeing to the conference report Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 320 - 102, 1 Present (Roll no. 839).(consideration: CR H14039-14055)
Source: ResolvingDifferences
6 December 1995
ResolvingDifferences
The previous question was ordered without objection.
Source: ResolvingDifferences
6 December 1995
Floor
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on the conference report.
Source: Floor
6 December 1995
ResolvingDifferences
Mr. Bliley brought up conference report H. Rept. 104-369 for consideration as a privileged matter.
Source: ResolvingDifferences
6 December 1995
Passed
Rule H. Res. 290 passed House.
Source: Floor
6 December 1995
Floor
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Source: Floor
7 December 1995
Floor
Presented to President.
Source: Floor
7 December 1995
President
Presented to President.
Source: President
19 December 1995
President
Vetoed by President. (consideration: CR 12/20/95 H15214-15215)
Source: President
19 December 1995
President
Vetoed by President.(consideration: CR 12/20/95 H15214-15215)
Source: President
19 December 1995
Passed
Mr. Thomas asked unanimous consent That if the Chair lays before the House a veto message from the President on the bill H.R. 1058 today--that the objections of the President be spread at large upon the Journal and that the message and bill be ordered printed as a House Document; and that consideration of the veto message be postponed until Wednesday, December 20, 1995. Agreed to without objection.
Source: Floor
19 December 1995
Passed
Mr. Thomas asked unanimous consent that if the Chair lays before the House a veto message from the President on the bill today, that the message of the President be spread at large upon the pages of the Journal; that the message and accompanying papers be printed as a House Document; and that further consideration of the veto message be postponed until Wednesday, December 20, 1995. Agreed to without objection.
Source: Floor
20 December 1995
Vote
Two-thirds of the Members present having voted in the affirmative the bill is passed, the objections of the President to the contrary notwithstanding. Passed by the Yeas and Nays (2/3 required): 319 - 100, 1 Present (Roll No. 870). (consideration: CR H15215-15224)
Source: Veto
20 December 1995
Vote
Passed House over veto: Two-thirds of the Members present having voted in the affirmative the bill is passed, the objections of the President to the contrary notwithstanding. Passed by the Yeas and Nays (2/3 required): 319 - 100, 1 Present (Roll No. 870).(consideration: CR H15215-15224)
Source: Veto
20 December 1995
Floor
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on question of passage of the bill, the objections of the President to the contrary notwithstanding.
Source: Floor
20 December 1995
Veto
The Chair announced that the message of the President would be spread at large upon the pages of the Journal and that the veto message and the bill be printed as a House Document
Source: Veto
20 December 1995
Veto
The Chair laid before the House the veto message from the President.
Source: Veto
21 December 1995
Veto
Veto message received in Senate. Held at the desk.
Source: Veto
22 December 1995
Vote
Passed Senate over veto by Yea-Nay Vote. 68-30. Record Vote No: 612. (consideration: CR S19180)
Source: Veto
22 December 1995
Became law
Became Public Law No: 104-67.
Source: President
22 December 1995
Became law
Became Public Law No: 104-67.
Source: BecameLaw
22 December 1995
Floor
Veto message considered by Senate by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S19146-19154)
Source: Floor
22 December 1995
Vote
Passed Senate over veto: Passed Senate over veto by Yea-Nay Vote. 68-30. Record Vote No: 612.(consideration: CR S19180)
Source: Veto
Votes
22 December 1995 · Veto Overridden · On Overriding the Veto H.R. 1058 · Veto Overridden · Official source
Yes 68 · No 30 · Abstain — · Absent/not voting 0
- Sen. Simpson, Alan K. [R-WY]Yea
- Sen. D'Amato, Alfonse [R-NY]Yea
- Sen. Specter, Arlen [R-PA]Nay
- Rep. Boxer, Barbara [D-CA-6]Nay
- Sen. Mikulski, Barbara A. [D-MD]Yea
- Rep. Campbell, Ben Nighthorse [D-CO-3]Yea
- Sen. Bradley, Bill [D-NJ]Yea
- Sen. Frist, William H. [R-TN]Yea
Showing the first 8 recorded positions. Vote totals above are complete.
5 December 1995 · Conference Report Agreed to · On the Conference Report H.R. 1058 · Conference Report Agreed to · Official source
Yes 65 · No 30 · Abstain — · Absent/not voting 3
- Sen. Simpson, Alan K. [R-WY]Yea
- Sen. D'Amato, Alfonse [R-NY]Yea
- Sen. Specter, Arlen [R-PA]Nay
- Rep. Boxer, Barbara [D-CA-6]Nay
- Sen. Mikulski, Barbara A. [D-MD]Yea
- Rep. Campbell, Ben Nighthorse [D-CO-3]Yea
- Sen. Bradley, Bill [D-NJ]Not Voting
- Sen. Frist, William H. [R-TN]Yea
Showing the first 8 recorded positions. Vote totals above are complete.
28 June 1995 · Bill Passed · On Passage of the Bill H.R. 1058 · Bill Passed · Official source
Yes 69 · No 30 · Abstain — · Absent/not voting 0
- Sen. Simpson, Alan K. [R-WY]Yea
- Sen. D'Amato, Alfonse [R-NY]Yea
- Sen. Specter, Arlen [R-PA]Nay
- Rep. Boxer, Barbara [D-CA-6]Nay
- Sen. Mikulski, Barbara A. [D-MD]Yea
- Rep. Campbell, Ben Nighthorse [D-CO-3]Yea
- Sen. Bradley, Bill [D-NJ]Yea
- Sen. Frist, William H. [R-TN]Yea
Showing the first 8 recorded positions. Vote totals above are complete.
Versions
- Enrolled Bill · undated · Official file
- Public Law · 23 December 1995 · Official file
- Engrossed Amendment Senate · 28 June 1995 · Official file
- Referred in Senate · 10 March 1995 · Official file
- Engrossed in House · 8 March 1995 · Official file
- Introduced in House · 27 February 1995 · Official file
Documents
16 official files
Enrolled Bill (text)
Enrolled Bill (text)
Enrolled Bill · EN
Enrolled Bill (PDF)
Enrolled Bill · EN
Public Law (text)
Public Law · EN · 23 December 1995
Public Law (PDF)
Public Law · EN · 23 December 1995
Conference report filed in House
summary · EN · 28 November 1995
Engrossed Amendment Senate (text)
Engrossed Amendment Senate · EN · 28 June 1995
Engrossed Amendment Senate (PDF)
Engrossed Amendment Senate · EN · 28 June 1995
Passed Senate amended
summary · EN · 28 June 1995
Referred in Senate (text)
Referred in Senate · EN · 10 March 1995
Referred in Senate (PDF)
Referred in Senate · EN · 10 March 1995
Engrossed in House (text)
Engrossed in House · EN · 8 March 1995
Engrossed in House (PDF)
Engrossed in House · EN · 8 March 1995
Passed House amended
summary · EN · 8 March 1995
Introduced in House (text)
Introduced in House · EN · 27 February 1995
Introduced in House (PDF)
Introduced in House · EN · 27 February 1995
Introduced in House
summary · EN · 27 February 1995
Sponsors
- Rep. Bliley, Tom [R-VA-3] · R · Sponsor
- Rep. Fields, Jack [R-TX-8] · R · Sponsor
- Rep. Cox, Christopher [R-CA-40] · R · Sponsor
- Rep. Tauzin, W. J. (Billy) [D-LA-3] · R · Sponsor
- Rep. Moorhead, Carlos J. [R-CA-22] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Oxley, Michael G. [R-OH-4] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Bilirakis, Michael [R-FL-9] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Schaefer, Dan [R-CO-6] · R · Cosponsor
- JOE BARTON · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Hastert, J. Dennis [R-IL-14] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Stearns, Cliff [R-FL-6] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Paxon, Bill [R-NY-31] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Gillmor, Paul E. [R-OH-5] · R · Cosponsor
- Mike Crapo · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Bilbray, Brian P. [R-CA-50] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Ganske, Greg [R-IA-4] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Norwood, Charles W. [R-GA-10] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. White, Rick [R-WA-1] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Edwards, Chet [D-TX-17] · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. Barcia, James A. [D-MI-5] · D · Cosponsor
- Sen. Coburn, Tom [R-OK] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Klug, Scott L. [R-WI-2] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Frisa, Dan [R-NY-4] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Brewster, Bill K. [D-OK-3] · D · Cosponsor
- · ssbk00 · Standing
- · hsju00 · Standing
- · hsif00 · Standing
Related records
- related to → Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
- related to → Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1058) to reform Federal securities litigation, and for other purposes.
- related to → Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1058) to reform Federal securities litigation, and for other purposes.
- related to → Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 1058) to reform Federal securities litigation, and for other purposes.
- related to ← Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.congress.gov/bill/104th-congress/house-bill/1058
- Open data entity: https://api.congress.gov/v3/bill/104/hr/1058
- us · 104-hr-1058 · source updated 7 April 2025