PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Law · HR

H.R. 3274 (114th)

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4567 Rockbridge Road in Pine Lake, Georgia, as the "Francis Manuel Ortega Post Office".

enactedUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

29 July 2015

Last action

13 June 2016 · President

Status

Became Public Law No: 114-172.

Sponsors

Rep. Johnson, Henry C. "Hank" [D-GA-4], Rep. Carter, Earl L. "Buddy" [R-GA-1], Sanford Bishop, Rep. Westmoreland, Lynn A. [R-GA-3], JOHN LEWIS, Tom Price, Rob Woodall, Austin Scott, Doug Collins, Jody Hice, Barry Loudermilk, Rep. Allen, Rick W. [R-GA-12], David Scott, Tom Graves

Subjects

Postal service

Source updated

7 April 2025

Postal service

Summary

Designates the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4567 Rockbridge Road in Pine Lake, Georgia, as the "Francis Manuel Ortega Post Office."

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 29 July 2015

    Introduced

    Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 29 July 2015

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 29 July 2015

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 9 October 2015

    Reported

    Ordered to be Reported by Unanimous Consent.

    Source: Committee

  5. 9 October 2015

    Committee

    Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    Source: Committee

  6. 1 March 2016

    Passed

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    Source: Floor

  7. 1 March 2016

    Passed

    On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H1065)

    Source: Floor

  8. 1 March 2016

    Passed

    Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H1065)

    Source: Floor

  9. 1 March 2016

    Floor

    DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 3274.

    Source: Floor

  10. 1 March 2016

    Floor

    Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H1065-1066)

    Source: Floor

  11. 1 March 2016

    Floor

    Mr. Russell moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

    Source: Floor

  12. 2 March 2016

    Introduced

    Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

    Source: IntroReferral

  13. 25 May 2016

    Calendars

    Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 493.

    Source: Calendars

  14. 25 May 2016

    Reported

    Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.

    Source: Committee

  15. 25 May 2016

    Reported

    Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Reported by Senator Johnson without amendment. Without written report.

    Source: Committee

  16. 26 May 2016

    Passed

    Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S3378)

    Source: Floor

  17. 26 May 2016

    Passed

    Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S3378)

    Source: Floor

  18. 27 May 2016

    Floor

    Message on Senate action sent to the House.

    Source: Floor

  19. 3 June 2016

    Floor

    Presented to President.

    Source: Floor

  20. 3 June 2016

    President

    Presented to President.

    Source: President

  21. 13 June 2016

    Became law

    Signed by President.

    Source: BecameLaw

  22. 13 June 2016

    Became law

    Became Public Law No: 114-172.

    Source: President

  23. 13 June 2016

    President

    Signed by President.

    Source: President

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

14 official files

Enrolled Bill (text)

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.