PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Report · CC

CELEX 62023CC0313

Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 4 October 2024.#Inspektorat kam Visshia sadeben savet.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#References for a preliminary ruling – Rule of law – Judicial independence – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Effective legal protection in the fields covered by Union law – Judicial body competent to propose the initiation of disciplinary proceedings against judges, public prosecutors and investigating magistrates, with a view to the imposition of disciplinary penalties – Members of the judicial body remaining in office after the expiry of their term of office – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Data security – Access by a judicial body to data relating to the bank accounts of judges and public prosecutors and of their family members – Judicial authorisation for the purpose of lifting banking secrecy – Court authorising the lifting of banking secrecy – Article 4(7) – Concept of ‘controller’ – Article 51 – Concept of ‘supervisory authority’.#Joined Cases C-313/23, C-316/23 and C-332/23.

Original

decidedEuropean Union· Court of Justice of the European Union· EN

Introduced

4 October 2024

Last action

4 October 2024 · Decided

Status

decided

Sponsors

Subjects

Rule of law

Source updated

4 October 2024

Rule of law

Timeline

  1. 4 October 2024

    Decided

    Source: work_date_document

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

23 official files

  • Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 4 October 2024.#Inspektorat kam Visshia sadeben savet.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#References for a preliminary ruling – Rule of law – Judicial independence – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Effective legal protection in the fields covered by Union law – Judicial body competent to propose the initiation of disciplinary proceedings against judges, public prosecutors and investigating magistrates, with a view to the imposition of disciplinary penalties – Members of the judicial body remaining in office after the expiry of their term of office – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Data security – Access by a judicial body to data relating to the bank accounts of judges and public prosecutors and of their family members – Judicial authorisation for the purpose of lifting banking secrecy – Court authorising the lifting of banking secrecy – Article 4(7) – Concept of ‘controller’ – Article 51 – Concept of ‘supervisory authority’.#Joined Cases C-313/23, C-316/23 and C-332/23.

    judgment · EN · 4 October 2024

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Förslag till avgörande av generaladvokat P. Pikamäe föredraget den 4 oktober 2024.###

    judgment · SV · 4 October 2024

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Schlussanträge des Generalanwalts P. Pikamäe vom 4. Oktober 2024.#Inspektorat kam Visshia sadeben savet.#Vorabentscheidungsersuchen des Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Rechtsstaatlichkeit – Richterliche Unabhängigkeit – Art. 19 Abs. 1 Unterabs. 2 EUV – Wirksamer Rechtsschutz in den vom Unionsrecht erfassten Bereichen – Justizorgan, das dafür zuständig ist, die Einleitung von Disziplinarverfahren gegen Richter, Staatsanwälte und Strafrechtspfleger zwecks Verhängung von Disziplinarmaßnahmen vorzuschlagen – Fortführung der Amtsgeschäfte durch die Mitglieder des Justizorgans nach Ablauf ihrer Amtszeit – Schutz natürlicher Personen bei der Verarbeitung personenbezogener Daten – Verordnung (EU) 2016/679 – Datensicherheit – Zugang eines Justizorgans zu den Daten betreffend die Bankkonten der Richter, Staatsanwälte und Strafrechtspfleger und ihrer Familienangehörigen – Gerichtliche Genehmigung der Aufhebung des Bankgeheimnisses – Gericht, das die Aufhebung des Bankgeheimnisses genehmigt – Art. 4 Nr. 7 – Begriff ‚Verantwortlicher‘ – Art. 51 – Begriff ‚Aufsichtsbehörde‘.#Verbundene Rechtssachen C-313/23, C-316/23 und C-332/23.

    judgment · DE · 4 October 2024

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Conclusions de l'avocat général M. P. Pikamäe, présentées le 4 octobre 2024.###

    judgment · FR · 4 October 2024

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Návrhy prednesené 4. októbra 2024 – generálny advokát P. Pikamäe.###

    judgment · SK · 4 October 2024

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Concluziile avocatului general Pdomnul . Pikamäe prezentate la 4 octombrie 2024.###

    judgment · RO · 4 October 2024

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Conclusões do advogado-geral Pikamäe apresentadas em 4 de outubro de 2024.###

    judgment · PT · 4 October 2024

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Opinia rzecznika generalnego P. Pikamäe przedstawiona w dniu 4 października 2024 r.###

    judgment · PL · 4 October 2024

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Conclusie van advocaat-generaal P. Pikamäe van 4 oktober 2024.###

    judgment · NL · 4 October 2024

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Konklużjonijiet tal-Avukat Ġenerali P. Pikamäe, ippreżentati l-4 ta’ Ottubru 2024.###

    judgment · MT · 4 October 2024

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Ģenerāladvokāta P. Pikamēes [P. Pikamäe] secinājumi, 2024. gada 4. oktobris.###

    judgment · LV · 4 October 2024

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Generalinio advokato P. Pikamäe išvada, pateikta 2024 m. spalio 4 d.###

    judgment · LT · 4 October 2024

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • P. Pikamäe főtanácsnok indítványa, az ismertetés napja: 2024. október 4.###

    judgment · HU · 4 October 2024

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Mišljenje nezavisnog odvjetnika P. Pikamäea od 4. listopada 2024.###

    judgment · HR · 4 October 2024

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Kohtujurist Pikamäe ettepanek, 4.10.2024.###

    judgment · ET · 4 October 2024

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Conclusiones del Abogado General Sr. P. Pikamäe, presentadas el 4 de octubre de 2024.###

    judgment · ES · 4 October 2024

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Προτάσεις του γενικού εισαγγελέα P. Pikamäe της 4ης Οκτωβρίου 2024.#Inspektorat kam Visshia sadeben savet.#Αιτήσεις του Sofiyski rayonen sad για την έκδοση προδικαστικής αποφάσεως.#Προδικαστική παραπομπή – Κράτος δικαίου – Ανεξαρτησία των δικαστών – Άρθρο 19, παράγραφος 1, δεύτερο εδάφιο, ΣΕΕ – Αποτελεσματική δικαστική προστασία στους τομείς που διέπονται από το δίκαιο της Ένωσης – Δικαστικό όργανο αρμόδιο να προτείνει την κίνηση πειθαρχικών διαδικασιών κατά των δικαστικών λειτουργών με σκοπό την επιβολή πειθαρχικών κυρώσεων – Παραμονή των μελών του δικαστικού οργάνου στη συγκεκριμένη θέση μετά το πέρας της θητείας τους – Προστασία των φυσικών προσώπων έναντι της επεξεργασίας των δεδομένων προσωπικού χαρακτήρα – Κανονισμός (ΕΕ) 2016/679 – Ασφάλεια των δεδομένων – Πρόσβαση δικαστικού οργάνου στα δεδομένα που αφορούν τους τραπεζικούς λογαριασμούς των δικαστικών λειτουργών και των μελών των οικογενειών τους – Δικαστική άδεια για την άρση του τραπεζικού απορρήτου – Δικαστήριο το οποίο χορηγεί άδεια για την άρση του τραπεζικού απορρήτου – Άρθρο 4, σημείο 7 – Έννοια του “υπευθύνου επεξεργασίας” – Άρθρο 51 – Έννοια της “εποπτικής αρχής”.#Συνεκδικασθείσες υποθέσεις C-313/23, C-316/23 και C-332/23.

    judgment · EL · 4 October 2024

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Stanovisko generálního advokáta P. Pikamäea přednesené dne 4. října 2024.###

    judgment · CS · 4 October 2024

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Sklepni predlogi generalnega pravobranilca P. Pikamäeja, predstavljeni 4. oktobra 2024.###

    judgment · SL · 4 October 2024

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Conclusioni dell’avvocato generale P. Pikamäe, presentate il 4 ottobre 2024.###

    judgment · IT · 4 October 2024

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Julkisasiamies P. Pikamäen ratkaisuehdotus 4.10.2024.###

    judgment · FI · 4 October 2024

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Forslag til afgørelse fra generaladvokat P. Pikamäe fremsat den 4. oktober 2024.###

    judgment · DA · 4 October 2024

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Заключение на генералния адвокат P. Pikamäe, представено на 4 октомври 2024 г.###

    judgment · BG · 4 October 2024

    DownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.

Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 4 October 2024.#Inspektorat kam Visshia sadeben savet.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#References for a preliminary ruling – Rule of law – Judicial independence – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Effective legal protection in the fields covered by Union law – Judicial body competent to propose the initiation of disciplinary proceedings against judges, public prosecutors and investigating magistrates, with a view to the imposition of disciplinary penalties – Members of the judicial body remaining in office after the expiry of their term of office – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Data security – Access by a judicial body to data relating to the bank accounts of judges and public prosecutors and of their family members – Judicial authorisation for the purpose of lifting banking secrecy – Court authorising the lifting of banking secrecy – Article 4(7) – Concept of ‘controller’ – Article 51 – Concept of ‘supervisory authority’.#Joined Cases C-313/23, C-316/23 and C-332/23. — European Union — PoliticalRepo