PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

France · Question · Question écrite

13461

Question 13461 — vocational training and apprenticeship

answeredFrance· National Assembly· FR

Introduced

10 March 2026

Last action

Status

répondue

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

14 July 2026

Summary

Mr. Pierre-Yves Cadalen draws the attention of the Minister of Labor and Solidarity to unequal access to rights concerning the personal training account. This account, the CPF, is gradually funded by everyone who works. It then makes it possible to finance continuing training as part of professional development or retraining. Since 2023, digital access to the CPF has been via the France identity platform, linked to France connect+ digital device or the La Poste digital identity digital device. These platforms only accept the French national identity card or a long-term residence permit. Since 2023, foreigners who do not have a long-term residence permit (5 years or more) can no longer access or use their CPF accounts. There are therefore thousands of foreign workers in France who cannot access digitally to their CPF while they contribute to it by working. In fact, residence permits lasting more than five years are not common and many people who have been in France for ten or fifteen years still have to renew their permit every year. To verify their identity, these people must complete a complex and tortuous procedure which many specialized agents (such as at France Travail) have not been aware of. fluent. He asks what will be put in place to compensate for this inequality of access to rights.

Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.