Question 15606 — civil servants and public agents

Summary

Mr. Maxime Laisney draws the attention of the Minister of Action and Public Accounts to the heavy climate which seems to reign at the national school of public finances in Noisiel due to an authoritarian framework established by the management. Alerted by several members of the school, both from the teaching staff and the trainees, the MP informed the Minister of dysfunctions affecting the freedoms of the agents of this school. public service. The establishment's interns, winners of a civil service competition, are subjected to the arbitrary nature of a rating based on a unit of competence perceived as a behavioral rating. This evaluation criterion prevents trainees from raising any objections or criticisms, under penalty of seeing this behavioral evaluation unit not validated. A climate of infantilization degrades learning conditions trainee agents. Violations of medical confidentiality regularly occur to the extent that trainees must present, prior to a medical appointment, proof containing the name of the practitioner, as well as a medical certificate following the absence. Teachers would be accused of laxity. For both teachers and trainees, the recommendations of preventive medicine are not applied systematically. Long months of negotiation are required for agents to see their rights respected. The organization of the family life of agents is also made difficult given the very late deadline for issuing timetables. The slightest delay by trainees considered unjustified by the administration, sometimes inevitable in Île-de-France given traffic conditions and public transport, is sanctioned by the withdrawal of one thirtieth of the remuneration. However, agents are not always able to provide proof of their delay, particularly when they travel by car. Teachers new to the establishment see their annual evaluation score systematically lowered, compared to other teachers already in post. This brutal process is demotivating and unequal since it constitutes a loss of chance of promotion for eligible agents. It is in contradiction with the national note emanating from the human resources department of the DGFiP relating to the 2026 professional evaluation specifying that the evaluation constitutes “a high point of sincere and caring exchange”. This dynamic would be specific to the Noisiel school of public finance. He asks him what he plans to do to allow the establishment of a healthier climate in this establishment.

Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.