Question 1647 — energy and fuels

Summary

Mr. Éric Bothorel alerts the Minister Delegate to the Minister of Ecological Transition, Energy, Climate and Risk Prevention, responsible for energy, about geobiology, an esoteric practice without established scientific basis which is developing on the territory's wind power projects. Geobiologists present themselves as specialists in energy fields, capable of identifying “telluric faults”, “ Curry networks”, “entities” and other “parasitic currents” using pendulums and Lecher antennas. However, according to several press articles and a survey carried out by G Milgram published Friday October 18, 2024, it seems that their interventions on wind power projects are increasing. According to AFP, the Pays de la Loire chamber of agriculture mentions on its website the existence in Loire-Atlantique of “a protocol (...)”, “in agreement with the prefect", indicating that "any wind turbine company is required before any installation to take charge at its own expense", a little more than a thousand euros in general, "a geobiological diagnosis". Contacted by AFP, the Loire-Atlantique prefecture confirms the existence of this protocol, specifying that “the carrying out of this type of diagnosis is not imposed by prefectural decree”. On wind farm sites, geobiologists would recommend moving certain masts, or even “informing” the concrete slab before pouring to “restore a vibratory and energetic function to the slab”; the AFP claims to have consulted the report submitted by a geobiologist which includes such recommendations. Among the products used by geobiologists to produce this “information” of concrete, Pneumatit, a blue liquid designed in particular thanks to the reading the Bible and sold for 300 euros per liter and whose manufacturer would be a partner of the French Federation of Geobiology. Thus the Chenu wind farm, in Sarthe, would have invested between 20,000 and 30,000 euros in the purchase of this blue liquid, according to Mediapart. If these facts were true, it would appear surprising that state services would allow the development of geobiology to the point of moving the locations of installations wind turbines in the name of “telluric currents” without scientific basis. Beyond that, the question of financing these practices arises: it would be abnormal for public money to finance geobiology. He would therefore like to know its position on the subject of geobiology, as well as the measures it intends to take so that public money does not finance such practices without an established scientific basis.

Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.