PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

France · Question · Question écrite

17118

Question 17118 — font

openFrance· National Assembly· FR

Introduced

Last action

Status

posée

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

Summary

Mrs. Marietta Karamanli draws the attention of the Minister of the Interior to the conditions of application of the specific seniority advantage (ASA) created by Law 91-775 of July 26, 1991 relating to various provisions relating to the civil service, for the benefit of civil servants working in difficult neighborhoods. This benefit corresponds to a seniority bonus of one month for each of the first three years of continuous assignment. in the eligible service then two months per additional year of continuous assignment. An interministerial decree of January 17, 2001 established the list of sectors eligible for the specific seniority advantage. It determined that only the police districts reporting to the general secretariats for police administration (SGAP) of Paris and Versailles benefit from it. The Council of State seized on the regularity of the decree considered (CE March 16, 2011) that the determination limited to the SGAP of Paris and Versailles constituted an error of law because it did not take into account the reality on the ground as affirmed by the law. Since then, this advantage has been open only to civil servants assigned to 161 public security districts (CSP) (mainland and overseas) specified by a decree of December 3, 2015 based on four criteria: rate of delinquency-numbers; effective rate of criminal violence; actual rate of outrages and rebellions; urban violence rate-effective. The new order is not retroactive. This results in differences in treatment that are sometimes inconsistent with the reality on the ground; Île-de-France and provincial services whose staff does not fall within a constituency, even with territorial jurisdiction, are excluded; many civil servants working in sectors affected by social and security problems do not benefit from this advantage; finally the criterion of numbers is called into question because it is sometimes disconnected from the delinquency observed. She wishes to know, on the one hand, how after the annulment of the first decree the careers of agents will be reconstituted by not depriving them of acquired rights, and on the other hand, how the 1991 law could be improved to allow an extension of the advantage by taking into account not only an assignment but also an exercise in difficult areas, finally how the implementing texts could concern all agents since their missions are actually carried out in a sensitive territory. At a time when police forces are in demand and the link with citizens needs to be strengthened, the validation of this advantage in an objective manner would be likely to reflect the desirable recognition.

Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.