PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

France · Question · Question écrite

18062

Question 18062 — security of property and people

openFrance· National Assembly· FR

Introduced

8 September 2026

Last action

Status

posée

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

8 September 2026

Summary

Mr. Romain Daubié draws the attention of the Minister of the Interior to the operating conditions of the National Council for Private Security Activities (CNAPS), a public establishment responsible for exercising administrative policing over private security actors in France. Following legitimate questions sent by professionals in the sector, the MP wishes to raise the question of the organizational difficulties which penalize the activity of security agents and companies. Indeed, significant delays in the processing and issuance of professional cards or renewals of approvals are regularly observed, preventing certain professionals from carrying out their activity calmly or creating legal uncertainty penalizing for the sector. In addition, the exercise of the control mission of the CNAPS must be accompanied by a impeccable transparency and guarantees of fairness in the processing of files and the application of administrative procedures. While private security constitutes an essential partner of the internal security forces for the protection of fellow citizens, he would like to know what measures the Government plans to take to streamline and accelerate the processing of requests to the CNAPS and guarantee control. administrative proportionate, efficient and transparent for security professionals.

Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.