PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

France · Question · Question écrite

21566

Question 21566 — people with disabilities

openFrance· National Assembly· FR

Introduced

Last action

Status

posée

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

Summary

Mr. Arnaud Viala alerts the Secretary of State, attached to the Prime Minister, responsible for disabled people, to the mission that the Government has entrusted to the General Inspectorate of Finance and the Inspectorate of Social Affairs regarding the operation of Work Support Establishments and Services (ESAT). These establishments are a real success: they allow citizens suffering from disabilities to be able to work in adequate conditions, with the possibility of resorting to medico-social support. This system is a source of pride for many, as it has proven to be effective in combating the exclusion of disabled people. There are 120,000 of them who benefit from this adapted work, within the 1,400 ESATs spread across the territory. However, the directions set out for the government mission are a source of concern for many associations. In Indeed, the inspections must both provide figures to the Government but also possible scenarios for the evolution of ESAT, even though the effects of the development of supported employment cannot yet be evaluated. Unfortunately, there is a fear that a hasty evaluation and conclusions will disrupt the extremely positive and socially beneficial dynamic that these establishments have helped to initiate. Also, he asks him what the Government's vision is for the protected sector in the years to come.

Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.