PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

France · Question · Question écrite

23978

Question 23978 — rail transport

answeredFrance· National Assembly· FR

Introduced

Last action

Status

répondue

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

7 November 2020

Summary

Mr. Robin Reda draws the attention of the Secretary of State, to the Minister of Ecological and Inclusive Transition, responsible for transport, to the threat weighing on rail security (SUGE) and, in turn, on travelers who use the rail lines. The SUGE, although old, renowned, with strong potential due to the high level of initial or continuing training, its powers, its action and its unfailing commitment is put in competition with private security agents, considered less expensive, but whose training, experience and prerogatives do not equal those of the SUGE. This situation generates deep unease among French citizens, aware that stations and trains represent a priority target for terrorists in anticipation of possible attacks. The Government's commitments in the fight against terrorism are clear. The Prime Minister mentioned this during the presentation of the Government's action plan against terrorism: "In the fight against terrorism, there can only be one school: that of permanent vigilance, that of constant rigor, that of continuous improvement." SUGE brings together these three qualities, which makes it unique. In view of these elements, he asks him if the trace of a “security tax” paid on the tickets will be examined by the Government so as not to cause this quality historical service to disappear.

Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.