PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

France · Question · Question écrite

24583

Question 24583 — diseases

openFrance· National Assembly· FR

Introduced

Last action

Status

posée

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

Summary

Mr. Xavier Breton draws the attention of the Minister of Solidarity and Health to the consequences suffered by people with diabetes in their professional lives. These people come up against legislation that has become obsolete due to changes in working conditions and suffer from preconceived ideas about their professional abilities. Access to regulated professions - police, firefighter, sailor, civil aviation, army etc. - is forbidden to them despite the immense therapeutic progress allowing a better balance of diabetes. This is a factor of exclusion from the labor market for the 1.3 million diabetic workers in France. Some choose to keep their diabetes secret at work, to the detriment of good medical follow-up. Sometimes imposed by employers, the status of recognition of the status of disabled worker (RQTH) does not constitute a response adapted to workers with long-term illness. Also, to encourage hiring and retention in employment, he asks whether it would be possible to create, in parallel with the RQTH, a long-term illness status (ALD) in order to allow these people to benefit from paid hours of absence for their medical follow-up. He wants to know if there are plans, in the short term, to set up an interministerial mission in order to to update the regulatory texts which limit the access of people with diabetes to prohibited professions.

Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.