Question· Question écrite3042answered
France · National Assembly
Mr. Pieyre-Alexandre Anglade questions the Minister of Higher Education, Research and Innovation on the application of the student plan in French high schools abroad. Indeed, the student plan, presented by the Prime Minister, the Minister of Higher Education, Research and Innovation, and the Minister of National Education on October 30, 2017 includes a section directly concerning high schools, on the questions information and guidance for final year students. It is therefore planned to dedicate two school weeks to their orientation during the last year of high school, in particular one before the winter holidays corresponding to the open days of higher education establishments. It is also planned to reorganize the class councils and appoint a second main teacher who will coordinate and support the students in their orientation, via the new “future sheets”. Aware of the special status of French high schools abroad, he wishes to question the details of the implementation of this reform within French high schools abroad, in order to ensure the fair treatment of all fellow students, residing in France or abroad.
Question· Question écrite14352answered
France · National Assembly
Mr. Pieyre-Alexandre Anglade draws the attention of the Minister of Solidarity and Health to the application of exceptions to the condition of stability of residence to French people living abroad. Since its implementation on January 1, 2016, the system for universal health protection (PUMA) has removed the notion of beneficiary and provided for a three-month residence requirement in France. With this system, an unemployed person therefore benefits from now on from covering her health costs as long as she resides stably and regularly in France for at least three months. Under these conditions, French people who return to France without employment, for example after accompanying their spouse abroad, cannot claim an exception to the condition of stability of residence and must therefore cover their own health costs during the first three months. of their impatriation. This system effectively puts citizens in a regrettable situation upon their return to France. In view of this situation, he therefore wishes to know his intentions to add this case to the exceptions to the condition of stability of residence of the PUMA system.
Question· Question écrite19080answered
France · National Assembly
Mr. Pieyre-Alexandre Anglade draws the attention of the Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs to the difficulties experienced by French people with disabilities established outside France in obtaining identity papers. Indeed, the system for granting these documents to French nationals abroad does not always take into account the specific needs of this public. A specific arrangement is necessary so that this public can enjoy the effective exercise of their rights and in particular their right to vote. Consulates should have the legal and material possibility of going to establishments hosting this public to have these documents established. This situation is all the more discriminatory as it causes a serious attack on the rights of French citizens. He questions him on the need to facilitate the issuance of identity papers to French, established outside France, with a disability.
Question· Question écrite5854open
France · National Assembly
Mr. Pieyre-Alexandre Anglade draws the attention of the Minister of National Education to the implementation of theoretical and practical training for teaching staff in learning tools adapted to students with specific learning disorders or with a high-potential profile. Schools in France and outside France are faced with an increase in students with specific learning disorders. or having a high-potential profile. The educational community indicates on the one hand, its desire to better understand these situations and on the other hand, the lack of training and suitable tools made available to teachers. It would be useful for a reflection to be launched to concretize adapted and lasting proposals for the development of tools aimed at improving the relationship between the educational community, diagnosed students and their parents. Mr. Pieyre-Alexandre Anglade also wishes to recall the importance of including representatives of French educational establishments located abroad under the direction of the Agency for French Education Abroad (AEFE) in the reflection. In view of this situation, he therefore wishes to know the intentions of the Minister in terms of support for the training of teachers in learning tools adapted to students with specific learning disorders or having a high-potential profile.
Question· Question écrite6017answered
France · National Assembly
Mr. Pieyre-Alexandre Anglade questions the Minister, attached to the Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs, responsible for European affairs, on the transparency of the European legislative process, in particular the work carried out by the Council of the European Union. While citizen consultations will be launched very soon, with the aim of making Europe more accessible to its citizens, the opacity of European institutions, in particular of the Council, continues to fuel public skepticism towards the European Union. To compensate for the lack of transparency inherent in the functioning of the Council, the European Ombudsman published on Tuesday February 13, 2018 a certain number of recommendations following an investigation launched in March 2017. In particular, it recommends systematically recording the positions expressed by States in the Council's working groups. and in the meetings of COREPER ambassadors and, in principle, to make the documents which record these positions available to the public proactively and in a timely manner. The implementation of these recommendations should enable European citizens to fully benefit from the right to information relating to the decisions that their governments take to shape European legislation and, therefore, to better understand themselves. familiarize yourself with the European decision-making process. While the Council has until May 9, 2018 to respond to these recommendations, it wishes to question it in order to know whether the position defended by France will move in the direction of greater transparency of the European legislative process.
Question· Question écrite23765answered
France · National Assembly
Mr. Pieyre-Alexandre Anglade draws the attention of the High Commissioner, to the Minister of Solidarity and Health, responsible for pensions, to the difficulties encountered for candidates for retirement residing abroad or being on international mobility. Indeed, the numerous administrative contingencies and the high number of contacts make the journey of the future retiree particularly long and difficult. Thus, the CNAVTS like the Supplementary pension funds recommend that retirement candidates begin the process six months before the planned retirement date. But the delays between the request for liquidation of the pension and its payment can be much longer. Dematerialized methods can constitute an alternative but the apprehension of these tools can sometimes constitute a barrier for many future retirees, especially more than the alternatives (calls or travel to CARSAT hotlines) are poorly suited to the situation of French people on the move. The hotlines are often far from the geographical locations of non-residents, and the switchboard numbers are difficult to reach. These obstacles can incur numerous costs for retirement candidates and ultimately lead some candidates to give up their rights. As part of the pension reform, he wants to know how it will take into account the situation of mobile retirees, in order to be able to simplify their administrative process as best as possible.
Question· Question écrite14353open
France · National Assembly
Mr. Pieyre-Alexandre Anglade draws the attention of the Secretary of State, to the Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs, to STAFE (Support for the associative fabric of associations of French people abroad). He congratulates the ministry for carrying out this first STAFE financing campaign. The results of this STAFE 2018 fundraising campaign nevertheless raise several questions. It is indeed regrettable that only 6 projects are retained in all diplomatic posts equally, knowing that the distribution of French people around the world varies greatly. Concretely, in the 4th constituency of French people abroad, 11 projects carried out by Benelux associations obtained funding for a total of 86,700 euros. This total represents 5% of STAFE funds distributed, while French people residing in the Benelux represent more than 10%. French people in the world. In addition, certain structures were unable to submit a request due to their legal structure. Indeed, certain associations linked to regional promotion or war memory are legally French although their activities are concentrated abroad. It therefore seems necessary to change the criterion of the nationality of the structure for the next campaign. So he gets his attention on the need for a better adequacy of the subsidy to the French presence, through a relaxation of the criterion of 6 projects per diplomatic post and an adaptation of the legal form necessary for the subsidy request.
Question· Question écrite9681answered
France · National Assembly
Mr. Pieyre-Alexandre Anglade draws the attention of the Minister, to the Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs, responsible for European affairs, to the Government's concrete objectives for the Francophonie within the European Institutions. During his speech on March 20, 2018 at the French Institute for French Language Strategy, the President of the Republic highlighted the paradox that constitutes the domination of the English language. in Brussels as the United Kingdom is about to leave the European Union. On the eve of the 2019 European elections, he would like to know the concrete modalities of the French Government's strategy for the defense of the Francophonie in European institutions, in particular on the linguistic regime of the 2019 electoral campaign and on the safeguarding of French as a working language within the Court of Justice. justice of the European Union.
Question· Question écrite5871open
France · National Assembly
Mr. Pieyre-Alexandre Anglade questions the Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs on the conditions of access to the State guarantee for bank loans during the creation of new French educational structures abroad. Decree No. 79-142 of February 19, 1979 relating to the conditions for granting the State guarantee to loans made by French schools abroad specifies that only approved establishments can benefit from a guarantee for their bank loans. This provision thus excludes the financing of projects to create new French school structures, which represents a major obstacle to the growth of the French school network throughout the world in the context of rapid development of all forms of English-speaking schooling. This scenario occurs particularly in Amsterdam. In this important European capital, the French presence is dynamically increasing (+7% between 2015 and 2016), a trend that the relocation of the European Medicines Agency should reinforce. Despite this development, young French people are forced to leave the French school system after elementary school since no French establishment is approved by the Ministry of National Education in Amsterdam. Young French people must join establishments offering international academic courses, while schooling in a French establishment is of crucial importance for these young people who sometimes have only a tenuous link with France. He questions him about potential more flexible conditions of access to the state guarantee for bank loans.
Question· Question écrite4576open
France · National Assembly
Mr. Pieyre-Alexandre Anglade draws the attention of the Minister, to the Minister of State, Minister for Ecological and Inclusive Transition, responsible for transport, to the elimination of the high-speed train line linking Brussels to Bordeaux. French people in Belgium are frequent users of rail links linking France to their country of residence. So they legitimately expect an improvement in rail connections between these two countries. The elimination of the Brussels-Bordeaux TGV line in December 2012 caused its former users to face a number of problems: additional transport costs, and the obligation to take expensive, time-consuming and inconvenient alternative routes. He therefore wishes to question him about existing projects to improve rail links between Belgium and France, and by extension, about the possible restoration of the TGV line linking Brussels to Bordeaux.
Question· Question écrite4890open
France · National Assembly
Mr. Pieyre-Alexandre Anglade questions the Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs about holding Defense and Citizenship Days abroad. Defense and Citizenship Day (JDC) informs young French citizens, between their sixteenth and twenty-fifth birthdays and following their census, about their rights and duties as well as the functioning of institutions. This day is an important step in taking civic awareness and in the construction of social bonds between young French people, whatever their origins and horizons. Abroad, this JDC takes on all the more crucial importance as young French people sometimes have only a tenuous link with their country of origin. Until 2016, the JDC took the form of a half-day theoretical training session. However, since 2016, this day has no longer been organized in Belgium, Luxembourg and the Netherlands (Benelux) due to lack of security resources and guarantees. Worse, it seems that the decision was made at ministerial level to simply eliminate the JDC for French expatriates. He therefore wishes to question him about the future of Defense and Citizenship Days abroad.
Question· Question écrite4010answered
France · National Assembly
Mr. Pieyre-Alexandre Anglade draws the attention of the Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs to the support of children with disabilities in French establishments abroad. The application of Law No. 2005-102 of February 11, 2005 for equal rights and opportunities, participation and citizenship of people with disabilities, makes it possible to better integrate children with disabilities into the school system. In France, the provision of support for a student with a disability is possible when an in-depth examination of the student's situation reveals the need, for a specific period, for human assistance or the support of a special education and home care service (SESSAD), with a view to optimizing their autonomy in learning. Outside the borders, there are many children with disabilities or benefiting from projects personalized schooling to be educated in the network of the agency for French education abroad (AEFE). However, only students with disabilities eligible for a traditional school scholarship can claim support from a school assistant (AVS), without whom this schooling is compromised. As a result, many families of disabled children receive no support and must assume only the cost of the AVS. Moreover, in the European Union there are few possibilities for support by the State of residence. This discriminatory situation is incompatible with the philosophy and principles of the 2005 law. French children with disabilities educated abroad must be given the same opportunities for development and integration at school as those educated in France. Therefore, he asks him if he intends to take measures in favor of universal financing of AVS abroad and at least proceed to an evaluation of the number of disabled French children educated in the AEFE network, in order to be able to estimate the cost of taking care of AVS outside our borders.
Question· Question écrite43599open
France · National Assembly
Mr. Pieyre-Alexandre Anglade questions the Minister of Solidarity and Health on the temporary suspension of the provisions relating to affiliation to social security schemes for cross-border workers exercising teleworking days in response to the current health crisis. Since the start of the pandemic, numerous measures have been taken in France and neighboring countries to limit travel and contacts and encourage or even force citizens who can to work from home. France and its neighbors agreed from the start of the crisis that their affiliation with a social security system would not be affected by the increased use of teleworking by cross-border workers, through agreements that were regularly extended. On September 1, 2021, the Ministry of Solidarity and Health published a press release to indicate that France's desire was to extend this measure of relaxation of the rules until the end of the management regime for exiting the health crisis provided for by July 31, 2022 by law. This relaxation measure being the result of consultation between several countries, it would be useful to know whether this wish of France met that of its neighbors. He would like to know accordingly, and in order to offer the many workers cross-border travelers relative legal certainty, if the temporary provisions concerning affiliation to social security during periods of epidemic are effectively extended until July 31, 2022 or an earlier date.
Question· Question écrite43597open
France · National Assembly
Mr. Pieyre-Alexandre Anglade questions the Minister of the Economy, Finance and Recovery on the new bilateral tax convention between France and Belgium. Since the planned disappearance of the special status of cross-border worker from the double taxation prevention convention between Belgium and France, cross-border workers who can no longer benefit from this status also lose the benefit of a quota of teleworking days. They therefore experience a change in tax regime from the first day of teleworking. This very important subject, which arises from the total support of citizens for the idea of a united Europe and its freedom of installation, goes beyond a fiscal question. Indeed, teleworking today is as much a question of public health as it is also a question of transport policy and environmental policy, by reducing the number of home-work trips on both sides of the border. Legitimate requests to obtain a certain number of days of teleworking have so far been unsuccessful. The new version of the bilateral tax convention signed on November 9, 2021 does not provide new elements on this subject which is referred to future discussions at OECD level. If the OECD level may seem legitimate to provide a more solution effective on a global subject which goes beyond the Franco-Belgian relationship alone, the delay in obtaining a response, via this channel, to a concrete problem in the lives of thousands of cross-border workers can nevertheless be worrying. He would therefore like to know when the discussion paper on the taxation of teleworking days for cross-border workers will be brought to the attention of the OECD and whether it is possible to consider while waiting for the signing of an amendment to the Franco-Belgian agreement temporarily granting all cross-border workers a certain number of days of teleworking.
Question· Question écrite35633open
France · National Assembly
Mr. Pieyre-Alexandre Anglade questions the Minister Delegate to the Minister of the Interior, responsible for citizenship, on the “prodigies of the Republic” operation. This system aims to reward those among French youth who are committed to serving others during this very special period. There are many of them, they are deserving and we can only welcome the Government's initiative to thank them and promote their commitment. However, the form put in place to highlight a young prodigy of the Republic does not seem to give the possibility of nominating young French people living abroad. It would be a shame to forget these many people who, individually or within associations such as mutual aid and charities, did not hesitate to provide help and support to their compatriots in difficulty during the health crisis. Also, he would like to know his position regarding the possibility of involving young French people abroad in this operation of the wonders of the Republic.
Question· Question écrite34966open
France · National Assembly
Mr. Pieyre-Alexandre Anglade questions the Minister of Solidarity and Health on the consequences of the epidemic situation for cross-border workers on their affiliation to a social security system. Numerous measures taken both by France and by many other European countries (including the Benelux countries) tend to limit travel and encourage or even force citizens who can to work from home. Until now, France and its neighbors have agreed that workers will remain affiliated to the same social security system as before the start of the crisis, without the increased use of teleworking having any impact on this situation. These provisions had been extended until December 31, 2020. It is in this spirit that France and Luxembourg have just agreed, Monday December 7, 2020, to extend their bilateral agreement on teleworking regarding tax issues. With these elements in mind and in order to ensure consistency with what is planned in tax matters, he wishes to know his position regarding the possibility of seeing the provisions concerning affiliation to social security during epidemic periods extended beyond December 31, 2020.
Question· Question écrite34965open
France · National Assembly
Mr. Pieyre-Alexandre Anglade questions the Minister of the Economy, Finance and Recovery on the amicable agreement with Belgium for cross-border workers concluded in the context of the fight against the spread of covid-19. This agreement guarantees cross-border workers that the days worked from home as part of the health crisis linked to covid-19 do not have any consequences on the tax regime applicable to them. applicable. The latest agreement signed with Belgium extends these provisions until December 31, 2020. Undoubtedly, the amicable agreement between Belgium and France on teleworking for cross-border workers has enabled workers to respect the recommendations of the French and Belgian governments, in terms of working from home, to fight the epidemic. France and Luxembourg have just agreed on Monday December 7, 2020 to extend their bilateral agreement on teleworking in the context of the fight against the spread of covid-19 until March 31, 2021. With these elements in mind, it wishes to know its position regarding the possibility of seeing the bilateral agreement with Belgium also extended beyond December 31, 2020.
Question· Question écrite32545answered
France · National Assembly
Mr. Pieyre-Alexandre Anglade questions the Minister of the Interior on the specific derogation system aimed at allowing life partners separated by the closure of borders during the pandemic to reunite, announced on August 8, 2020 by the Secretary of State to the Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs, responsible for tourism, French people living abroad and the Francophonie. After a month of existence, its effectiveness still remains to be determined. demonstrated since very few people have obtained satisfaction with their requests to benefit from this system. It seems that the validation process is blocked at the interministerial crisis unit. Furthermore, the criteria on which negative decisions may have been given do not always seem very transparent. Since this exceptional system was designed to provide a quick solution to life partners separated since several months now and it has been presented to them as such, it would be highly desirable for this system to function fully. He would like to know the decision-making procedure in this specific derogatory system aimed at allowing life partners separated by the closure of borders during the pandemic to reunite, and ask him what actions he plans to take to ensure that the system works. efficiently and transparently.
Question· Question écrite16930open
France · National Assembly · 14 July 2026
Mr. Pieyre-Alexandre Anglade draws the attention of the Minister of the Economy, Finance and Industrial, Energy and Digital Sovereignty to the consequences, for agents of the institutions of the European Union who have retained their tax residence in France, of the reform of the status of professional furnished rental company (LMP) resulting from article 53 of law no. 2026-103 of February 19, 2026 on finance for 2026. This article modifies the article 155IV of the general tax code (CGI) in order to put an end to the discrimination suffered by non-resident taxpayers in the assessment of the preponderance criterion making it possible to distinguish the statuses of professional furnished rental company (LMP) and non-professional furnished rental company (LMNP). From now on, for non-residents, furnished rental income is compared not only to professional income taxable in France, but also to professional income taxed in their State of residence, as long as this income is subject to a tax equivalent to French income tax. This welcome progress, however, leaves a difficulty remaining for a particular category of taxpayers: agents of the institutions of the European Union who, while exercising their functions abroad and in particular in the Benelux, maintain their domicile tax in France within the meaning of article 4 B of the CGI. In accordance with the protocol on the privileges and immunities of the European Union, their treatment is subject to Community tax only. However, article 155 IV of the CGI, as amended, only provides for the taking into account of income not subject to French income tax for taxpayers who do not have their tax residence in France. A European agent who remains a French tax resident thus finds himself in a paradoxical situation: his treatment does not appear in either of the two categories of income used to assess the preponderance, neither under taxable income in France since he is exempt, nor under the exemption open to non-residents since he resides in France. This situation can lead to a reclassification as an LMP based solely on the structure of its remuneration, even though the reform of 2026 aimed precisely to correct this type of bias. He asks whether the Government intends to clarify the terms of taking into account income subject to community tax in the assessment of the preponderance criterion provided for in Article 155 IV of the CGI for agents of European Union institutions who have retained their tax residence in France, in particular on the occasion of the draft finance law for 2027.
Question· Question écrite5948answered
France · National Assembly · 15 April 2025
Mr. Pieyre-Alexandre Anglade draws the attention of the Minister of the Economy, Finance and Industrial and Digital Sovereignty to the problem of double taxation of income from French real estate companies (SCI) held by persons residing for tax purposes in Belgium. Currently, this income is taxed in France as property income and in Belgium as dividends, due to a divergence of tax qualification between the two countries on this type of income. For comparison, the tax convention between France and Luxembourg distinguishes transparent companies from opaque companies and provides that partners of partnerships considered transparent can take advantage of the provisions of the convention to avoid double taxation. Likewise, the tax convention between France and Switzerland provides for specific measures to eliminate potential double taxation and the recent judgment of the Swiss federal court, although recognizing the non-translucent nature of French SCIs in Swiss law, goes in line with the objective of the convention and provides the tools to avoid any double taxation. He therefore asks him if the Government plans to enter into negotiations with the Belgian authorities in order to revise the tax convention Franco-Belgian to eliminate double taxation of income from French SCIs held by Belgian residents; these discussions could be held during those to be planned for the introduction of a teleworking quota in this same tax convention.
Question· Question écrite4891open
France · National Assembly · 11 March 2025
Mr. Pieyre-Alexandre Anglade questions the Minister to the Minister of the Economy, Finance and Industrial and Digital Sovereignty, responsible for public accounts, about the inaccessibility of the MaPrimeRénov' system for French people established outside France. With his parliamentary colleagues representing French people abroad, he obtained the inclusion in the finance law for 2024 of the concept of fallback residence and is now working to that it produces concrete effects. Among the tax advantages that this concept could bring is access to MaPrimeRénov', an essential system to support the energy renovation of housing. However, Decree No. 2020-26 of January 14, 2020 relating to the energy transition bonus requires the transmission of the reference tax income (RFR), available on the first page of the tax notice. This requirement creates a break of equality between French people established outside France who have a tax notice (because they declare income in France) and those who do not have one, due to lack of taxable income on national territory. Furthermore, even among those who have a tax notice, the RFR only reflects income received in France and not worldwide income, thus biasing the assessment of their real financial situation. It is likely that the administration excluded non-residents to avoid these inequalities. However, the decree does not appear to provide for such an exclusion, raising a question as to the conformity of this interpretation with the regulatory framework. Pending the conclusion of discussions on the extension of the concrete effects of the fallback residence, he would like to know how the Government intends to guarantee equitable access to MaPrimeRénov' for French people established outside France, taking into account their specific situation and whether adjustments are envisaged to correct these inconsistencies.
Question· Question écrite4739answered
France · National Assembly · 4 March 2025
Mr. Pieyre-Alexandre Anglade draws the attention of the Minister of the Economy, Finance and Industrial and Digital Sovereignty to the advisability of integrating a quota of teleworking days into the tax convention between France and Belgium. The introduction of a teleworking quota has been a long-standing request from cross-border workers established in Belgium and working in France. The MP relays this request and supports them actively. Numerous discussions and working meetings were held between the MP and the teams of the previous minister, who had made a commitment to put this issue back on the agenda for discussions with Belgium. In a previous and recent response, the Government indicated that the ratification of the convention signed in November 2021 was conditional on the successful conclusion of discussions between the authorities competent French and Belgian authorities aiming to study possible arrangements. To the extent that these discussions delay the entry into force of the new convention, it would be appropriate to immediately include a teleworking quota allowing cross-border workers to carry out part of their activity from home without changing their tax regime. A European framework agreement recently signed by France and the countries of Benelux already allows up to 50% teleworking without changing social security affiliation, thus removing a regulatory barrier. He therefore wishes to know whether the Government intends to take advantage of these discussions to integrate this adaptation into the tax convention and over what time frame such a modification could be implemented.
Question· Question écrite4696answered
France · National Assembly · 4 March 2025
Mr. Pieyre-Alexandre Anglade questions the Minister of the Economy, Finance and Industrial and Digital Sovereignty on the assessment of the fiscal impact of the introduction of a teleworking quota for cross-border workers between France and Belgium. Currently, these workers do not benefit from any specific regime allowing them to carry out part of their activity remotely without modifying their tax regime. A Such a situation slows down the development of teleworking despite the benefits it could bring in terms of quality of life and reduction of cross-border travel. In this perspective, he would like to know whether the ministry has impact studies on the effect that the introduction of a teleworking quota would have on French tax revenue, particularly with regard to the maintenance of taxation in France for cross-border workers residing in Belgium and carrying out their activity in France.
Question· Question écrite3934open
France · National Assembly · 11 February 2025
Mr. Pieyre-Alexandre Anglade questions the Minister of State, Keeper of the Seals, Minister of Justice, on the difficulties encountered by French people established outside France in accessing French justice, due to international postal delays and the absence of dematerialized communication solutions with the courts. In civil matters, article 643 of the code of civil procedure provides for an adaptation of procedural deadlines for litigants residing abroad, with an extended period of two months for French people established outside France. However, such a provision does not exist in criminal matters, which penalizes French people established outside France in the context of certain procedures, in particular when they file a complaint with the creation of a civil party. For example, article 186 of the code of criminal procedure provides for a period of ten days to file appeal of an order of dismissal, this period running from the dispatch of the notification by registered letter. However, the deadlines for receiving mail vary considerably depending on the country and can lead to a litigant being time-barred before even having knowledge of the decision. Furthermore, there is currently no reliable digital alternative allowing French people abroad to be informed in good time of court decisions concerning them. At a time when other administrations, particularly tax administrations, have set up electronic communication systems accessible via FranceConnect, a similar development in the judicial field would guarantee better access to the law for French people established outside France. He therefore asks him if he plans to adapt the criminal procedure in order to take these specificities into account, either by harmonizing the deadlines with those already provided for in civil matters, or by developing a dematerialized notification allowing litigants to be informed more quickly of the decisions concerning them.
Showing the 24 most recent records of 53. Browse the full list