Records
9 records where Pierre Person is listed as a sponsor, author, or other actor. Search with topics and years
Question· Question écrite36475open
France · National Assembly
M. Pierre Person attire l'attention de M. le ministre de l'intérieur sur les dérives inacceptables et mercantiles induites par la lenteur administrative dans l'obtention de rendez-vous auprès des services des préfectures, en particulier en Île-de-France, afin de déposer une demande de titre de séjour, de renouvellement ou de naturalisation. En effet, des officines, dont certaines affirment agir dans la légalité, mettent au point des algorithmes permettant de préempter les créneaux de rendez-vous pour les revendre ensuite aux usagers. Ce problème de délais d'attente n'est pas nouveau mais il s'est encore accentué avec la fermeture des services préfectoraux lors du premier confinement. Face à l'accumulation des dossiers à traiter, la dématérialisation de la procédure laisse pendant des mois voire des années des personnes face au mur du silence d'une administration numérisée à l'accès et déshumanisée. Cette situation a, entre autres, pour conséquences de faire prospérer l'intolérable commerce de créneaux de rendez-vous. Il est urgent de proposer un contact direct ou a minima téléphonique à ces usagers du service public maintenus malgré eux « dans une situation précaire, voire irrégulière », comme l'a fort justement souligné le Défenseur des droits en juillet 2020. La possibilité d'un contact direct entre agents des préfectures et usagers présenterait le double avantage de répondre à des situations de détresse et de court-circuiter les intermédiaires qui profitent de la situation. C'est la raison pour laquelle il le sollicite afin que les services placés sous son autorité éclairent la représentation nationale sur les mesures prévues pour permettre aux demandeurs d'obtenir des rendez-vous dans des délais plus raisonnables pour répondre à deux objectifs : apporter une réponse à des usagers bien souvent en situation précaire et surtout lutter efficacement contre la revente de rendez-vous en préfecture.
Question· Question écrite31184open
France · National Assembly
Mr. Pierre Person draws the attention of the Minister Delegate to the Minister of the Economy, Finance and Recovery, responsible for public accounts, to the exceptions for calling into question the benefit of the reduced VAT rate in the context of the acquisition of a property in the form of a sale in the future state of completion (VEFA). When acquiring real estate in the form of a sale in the future state of completion (VEFA), buyers benefit from a reduced VAT rate. If the latter decide to resell their property after less than ten years, they must then repay to the tax administration the differential between the 5.5% VAT from which they benefited on purchase and the base rate, i.e. 20%. The finance law for 2014 set exceptions which make it possible not to call into question the benefit of the reduced VAT rate, including the birth of a child. Before 2014, the law established that the events linked to these exceptions had to take place after the “acquisition” of a property. Since then, the Official Bulletin of Public Finances-Taxes has established that they must intervene after the “delivery” of the said property. Thus, a couple having purchased a home and then wishing to resell it upon the birth of their child would be exempt from the VAT differential if the property had already been delivered, but would be indebted if this was not already the case. However, family difficulties linked to the unsuitability of housing to accommodate a child arise from the moment the child is acquired. As such, it would appear logical that the entry point is the “acquisition” of the good and no longer its “delivery”. Furthermore, the 2014 decision appears to have been taken unilaterally and without justification by the tax administration. Also, he would like to understand for what purposes the Official Bulletin of Public Finances-Taxes modified the conditions of application of the exceptions to the questioning of the benefit of the VAT rate and hopes to see the BOFIP VAT IMM 20-20-20 Chapter 5 Paragraph B modified.
Question· Question écrite16030open
France · National Assembly
Mr. Pierre Person draws the attention of the Minister of the Economy and Finance to recent publications relating to the evaluation of reductions in social security contributions and their effects on employment and the competitiveness of businesses. At the end of a note published on January 14, 2019, the Economic Analysis Council (CAE) undertook to measure the effects of the different measures adopted since 1995 up to the measures introducing credit tax, competitiveness, employment and the responsibility pact. These experts suggest, on the one hand, with regard to the sole objective of supporting employment and the fight against unemployment, to favor exemptions from contributions targeted at low salaries and to eliminate all charges at the level of the SMIC and on the other hand to abandon, for the 2020 budget, the reductions in social contributions for salaries above 2.5 SMIC or even for all those exceeding 1.6 SMIC if other experts (in particular France Stratégie) were to confirm the results of their study. They estimate that such a decision would allow the State to recover 4 billion euros. Indeed, this first study makes it possible to establish that, for remuneration above 1.6 SMIC, the exemptions had a small impact on job creation but no effect on the increase in exports (and a fortiori on the competitiveness of businesses). Consequently, he asks him to ask the services placed under the authority of the Government to carry out the necessary evaluations to confirm or refute such a position. In any case, in consideration of the savings likely to be made and the efficiency of the system, it calls on the Government to consider removing these exemptions.
Question· Question écrite14483open
France · National Assembly
Mr. Pierre Person draws the attention of the Minister, to the Minister of State, Minister for Ecological and Inclusive Transition, responsible for transport, to the development of electric personal transportation vehicles on public roads, without a clear legal framework. If out of the 12 million daily trips made in Île-de-France, only a small number are made today with these new modes of mobility, this is for so much of a growing social phenomenon. Monowheels, gyrowheels, electric scooters, and even hoverboards are very popular with the French and many tourists who take advantage of the ease of use to move more freely in cities. However, many accidents are recorded every day. Collisions with pedestrians or other vehicles, failure to respect signs or even speeding excessive are common. These personal travel devices can in fact reach up to 60 km/h for some, without the obligation to take out specific insurance, wear a helmet or protective equipment or travel in defined areas. This directly endangers the safety of both the users of these vehicles and other users of the public highway. Tolerated on sidewalks as long as they would not exceed the speed of a pedestrian (6 km/h), accepted on cycle paths, the current regulatory framework however seems unsuitable and does not take into account the evolution of the uses of these fun mobility. MP Hugues Renson had already raised this issue in November 2017, a sign that global reflection now seems to need to be undertaken on the subject. Therefore, he wants to ask her if they are considering modifying the Highway Code in order to clarify the legal framework for electric personal transport vehicles or to integrate these issues into future bills.
Question· Question écrite14340open
France · National Assembly
Mr. Pierre Person draws the attention of the Minister of National Education and Youth to the case of unaccompanied foreign minors and the measures implemented to enable their schooling. In 2017, nearly 25,000 unaccompanied foreign minors (UMAs) or unaccompanied foreign minors were recorded in France. A number growing by nearly 85% in two years, and surely below reality, given the difficulties identification and the need for a double “social evaluation of the minority and the family isolation of the unaccompanied minor” to characterize the age of the isolated individual. The care of these young people is today complex, with the various local authorities having expressed their reluctance due to lack of resources. Questions related to the security and accommodation of these young people - some living on the street, as near of 400 young people during the winter of 2017-2018 in Paris - are often mentioned. However, that of their schooling is just as crucial and must now be clarified. Being able to be educated, learn French and the basics of calculation are a major challenge in order to allow these young people, in the long term, to benefit from training, to gain their independence and to integrate into society. As mentioned in article L. 111-1 al. 5 of the code education, unaccompanied foreign minors must be able to benefit from the right to education. They then join the system for welcoming allophone children - within the framework of academic centers for the education of newly arrived allophone children and children from itinerant and traveling families (CASNAV) - notably implemented through child welfare (under the supervision of the departments). Today, however, this system seems to be outdated, the assignment time and the reception rate having deteriorated significantly. The difficulty of consultation between the rectorate and departmental services is particularly mentioned. Also, he would like to know if improvements to the current system are envisaged, in order to overcome these administrative difficulties and make the schooling of each young isolated (foreign) minor effective.
Question· Question écrite33660open
France · National Assembly · 10 March 2020
Mr. Pierre Person draws the attention of the Minister of the Economy, Finance and Recovery to the use of digital assets in the context of financing terrorism. During an intervention on a public television channel on October 18, 2020, the Minister called for strengthening the control of financial flows relating to the financing of terrorism. He notably highlighted the role of crypto-assets as vehicle for these fraudulent practices. As part of the report on “virtual currencies” submitted by Mr. MP in 2019, the numerous stakeholders met, both institutional and private, were all concerned that the crypto-currency ecosystem develop within the framework of unprecedented regulations, a guarantee of seriousness. All speakers also agreed on the preeminent role of cash as a financing vehicle. fraudulent operations as well as the difficulties encountered by administrations in tracking crypto-asset transactions internationally. Therefore and following the recommendations of the experts, the report submitted to the National Assembly called, for greater efficiency, for increased supervision of the crossing points between fiat currency and crypto-assets; and not to a regulation of the crypto-assets themselves. Assets digital technologies, but above all the technology which underlies them, the blockchain, are an innovation and will allow France and Europe to reaffirm their sovereignty vis-à-vis foreign powers, particularly in the monetary field. In a context of heightened international competition and in order to efficiently ensure the security of the French, it seems important that solid links be established between crypto-asset operations. and criminal and terrorist acts. This is why he is requesting it so that the services placed under the authority of the Government can enlighten the national representation on existing cases of concrete involvement of crypto-assets in acts of terrorism.
Question· Question écrite18654answered
France · National Assembly · 3 September 2019
Mr. Pierre Person draws the attention of the Minister to the Minister of Territorial Cohesion and Relations with Local Authorities, responsible for cities and housing, to the application of the solidarity rent supplement. Since the modification of the regulations in the Equality and Citizenship law at the initiative of the Minister of Housing, Ms. Emmanuelle Cosse, the possibility given to social landlords to exempt from additional rent (SLS) households exceeding the social housing resource ceilings when they were already occupying their accommodation at the time of the agreement has been lifted. If the ELAN bill offers a right of option to tenants, thus allowing them to choose between the application of a solidarity rent supplement and the continuation of a private lease during an agreement, many beneficiaries of approved housing before the promulgation of this bill are now in an impasse. The National Social Housing Control Agency (ANCOLS) has asked Parisian landlords to comply with the regulations in force, which leads social landlords, following a social survey, to claim additional rents from tenants exceeding the eligibility criteria. The additional costs requested as well as the short delivery times regulation have aroused among these tenants a real feeling of injustice since the beginning of 2019. Indeed, tenants who, when agreeing their accommodation, were not able to anticipate the economic consequences brought about by new legislation, regret the brutality of the application of the law of January 27, 2017. Also, in order to continue the spirit of pragmatism of the ELAN bill, he would like to know to what extent To this extent, the Government provides for the application of these additional rents while allowing everyone to adapt, with flexibility and discernment, their rental situation to their financial means.
Question· Question écrite13158answered
France · National Assembly · 9 September 2018
Mr. Pierre Person draws the attention of the Minister of Solidarity and Health to the ineffectiveness of the right to accumulation granted to full-time hospital doctors. Indeed, article R. 6152-30 of the public health code provides the possibility, for a hospital practitioner engaged full-time, to exercise two half-days of medical activity of general interest. This is distributed weekly, according to an established convention between organizations and only for activities listed in Article L. 6112-1 of the Public Health Code. In fact, this “right to accumulation”, a vector of research and development, sharing of skills and provision of care and expertise outside the hospital, is only slightly effective and rarely granted to hospital doctors employed full-time. However, certain non-hospital medical centers, particularly those dedicated to pathologies of cognition, can only function through the weekly provision of care provided by specialist doctors and paramedical staff. Thus, the effectiveness of the “right to accumulation” for full-time hospital practitioners conditions the operation of these medical centers, in town and in rural areas. Thus, in the continuity of the health plan, he would like to know the directions that she would like to adopt about this.
Question· Question écrite13154open
France · National Assembly · 9 September 2018
Mr. Pierre Person wishes to draw the attention of the Minister of Solidarity and Health to the practice of osteopathy in France. As recalled in article 75 of the 2002 law, three types of professionals can today perform osteopathic procedures in France: osteopaths who are doctors of medicine (ODM), paramedical osteopaths (OP) and osteopaths who are not health professionals (ONPS). Among them, only osteopaths Medical doctors benefit from a state diploma, obtained following a course of 9 to 15 years. They have thus been particularly trained in delivering a medical diagnosis, unlike the other two types of osteopaths. This explains why certain manipulations can only be carried out by OPs or ONPS if the patient has a certificate of no contraindication, issued by a doctor. However, although this distinction is enshrined in law, the situation turns out to be more confusing on the ground. It is indeed recurrent that patients wishing to consult an osteopath do not know whether they are contacting a health professional or a non-professional, practicing comfort procedures. The mention “DO” (graduate in osteopathy) which benefits non-health professionals and which appears on business cards or professional plaques leaves believe patients that the professional in question is a “doctor of osteopathy” when in fact he is qualified in osteopathy. In addition, the development of an undifferentiated use of the three types of osteopaths seems to have contributed to a multiplication in the number of practitioners, 26,222 practitioners in 2016, a doubling in 5 years, and 6 times more than in the United Kingdom for an identical population monitored. Many of them, in In particular, young osteopaths who are not health professionals, currently live in a precarious situation, being the first to depend on a situation where the supply is much greater than the demand for care. Also, it is clear that the sector today requires real clarification between the different types of practitioners and a more sustainable development of activity, so that patients and practitioners can receive care and exercise in a more transparent, secure and peaceful environment. He therefore wishes to know whether these issues have been taken into account within the framework of the new health plan, presented at the beginning of September 2018, or whether other measures or plans are being studied in this regard.