Records
18 records where Céline Thiébault-Martinez is listed as a sponsor, author, or other actor. Search with topics and years
Question· Question écrite16239open
France · National Assembly · 23 June 2026
Mme Céline Thiébault-Martinez attire l'attention de M. le garde des sceaux, ministre de la justice, sur les difficultés rencontrées par les justiciables dans l'exécution des décisions de justice par les administrations. Ces derniers mois, les difficultés d'exécution des décisions de justice récurrentes se sont accrues, notamment avec les préfectures de police et les services du ministre de l'intérieur. Ces difficultés surviennent régulièrement en droit des étrangers (renouvellement des titres de séjour, rendez-vous en préfecture), mais concernent également les fonctionnaires et autres agents publics, lorsqu'une décision de justice administrative, notamment en référé, rétablit la légalité en annulant ou en suspendant une décision administrative illégale. Or l'administration concernée prend régulièrement une décision similaire à celle qui a été annulée ou suspendue par la juridiction administrative, obligeant le requérant à introduire de nouveaux recours devant la même juridiction administrative. Dans certains contentieux en fonction publique, le requérant doit introduire dix recours successifs, au lieu de deux recours, encombrant ainsi les juridictions administratives. Le sujet est d'actualité et au cœur du fonctionnement de la justice administrative et depuis longtemps. Dans son rapport public pour 2003, le Conseil d'État relevait qu'en matière d'exécution, « la question la plus préoccupante est celle du défaut d'exécution des condamnations pécuniaires ». Ces difficultés d'exécution entraînent « un gaspillage d'énergie, de temps et de moyens ». Quelques années plus tard, les mêmes difficultés sont stigmatisées en 2008 s'agissant des condamnations pécuniaires, notamment de faible montant, le Conseil d'État relevant qu'elles sont « à l'origine à la fois d'un encombrement inutile des juridictions et d'une dégradation réelle de l'image de l'autorité publique qui donne l'impression d'être peu désireuse ou incapable de s'acquitter de ses obligations » (Rapport public, 2008, préc., p. 158). Le problème n'est pas nouveau. Il semble s'être amplifié et représente un nombre non négligeable de procédures pendantes devant les juridictions administratives : le nombre de requêtes tendant à l'exécution des décisions de justice était de 1 800 en 2007 (CE, Rapport public, 2008, n° 59, p. 157 et s.), il est aujourd'hui égal au double : le Conseil d'État dénombrait ainsi 4 487 demandes d'exécution, soit une augmentation de plus de 23 % entre 2020 et 2021 (rapport « Activité juridictionnelle et consultative des juridictions administratives » de 2021). Cela a évidemment un coût pour le requérant concerné par la réticence de l'administration à exécuter les décisions de justice qui lui donnent tort (honoraires, non-respect de ses droits, etc.). Cela a aussi un coût social : le coût de la confiance en l'État de droit et en son administration pour le fonctionnaire concerné, pour l'étranger concerné, pour l'entreprise qui l'emploie. Le fonctionnement des juridictions administratives, qui doivent gérer l'afflux de requêtes, s'est gravement alourdi et cela a un impact sur le délai de traitement des requêtes. L'État de droit n'est pourtant pas une option pour les administrations. Elle lui demande quelles mesures le Gouvernement entend prendre pour inciter les gestionnaires des administrations à exécuter les décisions de justice spontanément, notamment par l'édiction d'une circulaire rappelant les sanctions applicables.
Question· Question écrite16235answered
France · National Assembly · 23 June 2026
Ms. Céline Thiébault-Martinez draws the attention of the Minister Delegate to the Prime Minister, responsible for equality between women and men and the fight against discrimination, to the deployment of end-of-management credits for 2025 in favor of centers for the care of perpetrators of domestic violence (CPCA). Support centers for perpetrators of domestic violence constitute an essential link in public policy of fight against violence, in that they make it possible to interrupt cycles of violence and prevent recurrence. Where the judicial response aims at sanction and reparation, the CPCAs intervene at the root of the phenomenon through education, accountability, awareness-raising and individualized support for the perpetrators. Beyond this approach, the system has demonstrated its effectiveness. More than 11,000 awareness training courses have carried out in 2023, more than 66,000 authors have been supported since 2020 and voluntary approaches increased by 80% between 2021 and 2023, reflecting the growing support of the audiences concerned and the recognized usefulness of these actions. During recent budgetary discussions and in particular during the public session in the Senate on December 6, 2025, the Minister indicated that she had succeeded in freeing, at the end of management for the year 2025, 5 million additional euros for the ministry, a part of which had to be immediately allocated to the CPCAs and that part of these credits could have been deployed before the closure of budget execution. She also reaffirmed her desire to guarantee the continuity of the actions of the CPCAs by maintaining in 2026 a level of commitment equivalent to that of 2025. In this context, she would like to know the precise amount of end-of-year credits. 2025 management actually allocated to treatment centers for perpetrators of domestic violence, the terms of their deployment, as well as the timetable for their notification and payment to the structures concerned. She also questions the way in which these credits contribute to securing the financing of the CPCAs for the year 2026. Furthermore, she questions the coherence of the current budgetary attachment of these devices. Indeed, the CPCAs intervene in close coordination with the criminal justice chain and pursue objectives of prevention of recidivism and reintegration of perpetrators, thus fully falling within public justice policies. Therefore, she wishes to know if the Government is considering a change in their financing, in particular by an attachment to the budget of the Ministry of Justice or by an interministerial approach. more structured, in order to ensure sustainable financing consistent with the judicial and penal nature of these systems. Finally, in view of the convincing results of the system and the challenges of sustainable prevention of domestic violence, she would like to know the Government's intentions regarding the sanctuary and, if necessary, the strengthening of funding for CPCAs in the next finance laws.
Question· Question écrite16212open
France · National Assembly · 23 June 2026
Ms. Céline Thiébault-Martinez draws the attention of the Minister of Health, Families, Autonomy and People with Disabilities to the worrying situation of several hospital practitioners and associated practitioners qualified outside the European Union (PADHUE), working in numerous public health establishments throughout the territory. These doctors, recruited by these establishments, have been carrying out essential missions for several years in a context of medical shortage and strong competition from the private sector. In order to guarantee the continuity and quality of care and to ensure their attractiveness, hospitals have implemented additional remuneration (bonuses, hardship allowances, additional working time) often linked to the functions performed and to workloads which can reach 60 to 70 hours per week. But a practice today in full This boom is seriously weakening these caregivers and the public service: many health establishment managements are now demanding reimbursement of allegedly illegal remuneration, although paid for months or even years and expressly validated by themselves or by previous management. These requests take the form of enforceable titles or salary deductions, sometimes cumulative, for amounts that may reach 150,000 euros. They are based on the provisions of article 37-1 of the law of April 12, 2000 and article L. 711-6 of the general civil service code, which authorize the repetition of undue payments over two years, including when they result from decisions creating rights that have become final. Their application thus leads to making public agents in good faith bear the consequences of errors committed. and assumed by their own administration, even though the sums in question remunerate a service actually performed and are based on express and consolidated decisions. These reimbursement requests are particularly pernicious, in that they aim to make the agents concerned work harder, with the latter being encouraged to make up the shortfall resulting from the loss of compensation and the reimbursement request. This The situation in public hospitals constitutes a particularly illuminating illustration of the harmful effects of this regime, which places simple liquidation errors and commitments made by the administration in return for work on the same level. It breaks with previous administrative jurisprudence, which clearly distinguished these hypotheses and protected decisions creating rights beyond a period of four month, as recalled by the Council of State (CE, opinion, May 3, 2004, Fort, n° 262074) in ruling that a decision granting a financial advantage, including revealed by pay slips, could only be withdrawn within this period. This position was subsequently confirmed (CE, July 27, 2005, no. 270487; CE, opinion, May 28, 2014, no. 376501, 376573), recalling that the administration cannot repeat sums paid pursuant to a decision creator of rights only on the condition of having proceeded with its withdrawal within the deadlines. By now allowing the questioning, for two years, of final express decisions, including when they reflect a commitment from the administration in return for a service provided, the legislator has established a regime that is particularly unfavorable to public agents, compromising the continuity of the public service and the trust between the employer and his agent. This seriously undermines the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution, such as the right to property, equality before the law and public duties or the principle of non-retroactivity. In addition, this system results in placing a burden on agents which is not their responsibility, while relieving the administration which is responsible for controlling expenditure, thus creating a risk of double recovery of “overpayments”. It also allows unjust enrichment of hospitals, which retain the benefit of the work accomplished while retroactively requiring reimbursement. There is also a risk of misuse of power. The social cost is enormous, while these caregivers can no longer trust their public employer, who tries to make them bear the burden of his fault, that their departure from these hospitals would force the closure of several services and that some are on sick leave or have resigned. She asks him what measures the Government intends to take to legally secure the employment conditions of public officials and to prevent them from these reimbursement requests with dramatic and manifestly unconstitutional consequences.
Question· Question écrite16209open
France · National Assembly · 23 June 2026
Ms. Céline Thiébault-Martinez draws the attention of the Minister Delegate to the Prime Minister, responsible for equality between women and men and the fight against discrimination, to the lack of information for future spouses regarding the name used at the time of marriage. French law distinguishes the birth name from the common name that each spouse can freely adopt. Thus, a married woman can keep her birth name, take the name of her spouse or join the two, without any legal obligation imposing the name of her spouse. This fundamental freedom, enshrined in article 225-1 of the civil code, constitutes a direct expression of the principle of equality between women and men. However, many women are unaware of the very existence of the customary name and believe, wrongly, that they are required to bear their husband's name from the celebration of the marriage, which they sometimes do without update their identity documents, with all the administrative complications that this can entail. The future spouses do not seem to receive, during the preparation of their marriage file at the town hall, any specific information on their respective rights in matters of name. Such a gap deprives women of the possibility of exercising this choice with full knowledge of the facts and complete independence. This attack on freedom of choice is accentuated by the administrative practice which very often assigns the husband's name as the wife's usual name, including when the latter does not use it and has no official document established in this name. She asks him to indicate what measures the Government intends to take to correct on the one hand this lack of information for future spouses on their respective rights and on the other hand the administrative practice which, through ease or patriarchal resistance, does not seem to have taken into consideration the will of the legislator. It specifies that an instruction could usefully invite civil status officers to systematically inform future spouses when compiling the marriage file, as well as to any administration collecting data relating to civil status so that the attribution of the usual name to insured persons is subject to their express consent, in accordance with the provisions of the civil code. She wants to know his position on this subject.
Question· Question écrite14157open
France · National Assembly · 7 April 2026
Ms. Céline Thiébault-Martinez draws the attention of the Keeper of the Seals, Minister of Justice, to the economic and statutory situation of legal experts and to the consequences of certain recent developments relating to their remuneration. She wishes to recall the extent to which judicial experts play a decisive role in the organization and good administration of justice. Registered on lists established by the courts of appeal, commissioned by judicial decision and required to take an oath, they act as occasional collaborators of the public service and justice in order to enlighten magistrates in technical or scientific matters. Whether medical, psychological, psychiatric, technical or financial expertise, their analyzes constitute determining elements for the establishment of the facts and the manifestation of the truth. In criminal proceedings, their interventions are paid by the State as legal costs. The vast majority of them work under liberal status and do not benefit from the financial guarantees attached to public status. However, several recent developments are causing serious concern among these professionals. Since 2013, experts have been subject to VAT and must repay the amount to the Public Treasury even when their fees have not yet been paid by the State. Furthermore, a bill recently tabled by Nadine Bellurot in the Senate provides for the possibility of setting a maximum payment period for legal expertise of up to 180 days. Such a development raises questions even though the payment deadlines observed are already of the order of 60 to 70 days on average, while the common law deadline applicable to payments of state is 30 days. This accumulation of financial constraints poses a real risk of structural weakening of the judicial expertise system. It could lead to a gradual disengagement of specialized experts, a dwindling of the available pool, an extension of investigation times and, ultimately, a deterioration in the quality of the decisions rendered. Such a development would fuel concerns about a justice system weakened by budgetary considerations, to the detriment of the effectiveness of a fair trial. In a context where the confidence of litigants and in particular victims of gender-based and sexual violence is already deeply weakened by the low conviction rates and the length of procedures, any attack on the solidity of the judicial chain would be particularly worrying. She therefore asks him to please specify the Government's position on the possible extension of payment deadlines for legal expertise and on the accumulation of this development with VAT liability; whether measures are envisaged to guarantee reasonable payment deadlines compatible with the liberal exercise of these missions and what measures the Government intends to take to preserve the attractiveness, independence and availability of these professionals essential to the proper functioning of the public justice service.
Question· Question écrite14130open
France · National Assembly · 7 April 2026
Ms. Céline Thiébault-Martinez draws the attention of the Minister Delegate to the Prime Minister, responsible for equality between women and men and the fight against discrimination, to the actions and positions taken by the Némésis identity collective, as well as to recent press revelations highlighting particularly worrying internal exchanges. According to several elements made public, members of this collective allegedly maintained operational links with small neofascist groups with a view to organizing coordinated actions intended to provoke or facilitate clashes with political activists. Conversations include team building, planning ambushes and using activists as “bait” to lure opponents into situations that could escalate into physical violence. Of Such facts, if established, would fall under serious criminal classifications, in particular violence in meetings, violence by an organized gang, or even criminal association with a view to preparing crimes. They also question the existence of a structured and concerted organization pursuing the objective of disturbing public order through intimidation and violence. Furthermore, these revelations come in a context marked by recent violent clashes in Lyon, leading to the tragic death of an identity activist on February 14, 2026. This murder was the subject of unanimous condemnation. The courts have made arrests and a judicial investigation is underway. Political violence, whatever the ideological motivations, cannot be tolerated in a rule of law. With regard to these elements and in accordance with the provisions of article L. 212-1 of the internal security code, which allow the dissolution by decree in the Council of Ministers of associations or groups in fact provoking or participating in violent acts against people or property, the question of the dissolution of the Némésis collective is now raised in the public debate. She therefore asks him if the facts revealed gave rise to investigations. specific administrative or judicial measures targeting the Némésis collective as a group; if the ministry's services have elements establishing the existence of coordinated actions likely to characterize violence by an organized gang or an association of criminals and if the Government plans to initiate a procedure for the dissolution of the Némésis collective on the basis of article L. 212-1 of the security code internal, in order to prevent any reiteration of facts likely to seriously undermine public order and republican principles.
Question· Question écrite13303answered
France · National Assembly · 3 March 2026
Ms. Céline Thiébault-Martinez draws the attention of the Minister Delegate to the Prime Minister, responsible for equality between women and men and the fight against discrimination, on the occasion of March 8, the international day of struggle for women's rights, to the need to include on the agenda of the National Assembly proposed law No. 2169 aimed at comprehensively combating sexist and sexual violence committed against women and children. In an international context marked by the progression of the far right, increased political polarization and the progression of masculinist and anti-feminist movements, women's rights once again constitute a strategic terrain for imposing an authoritarian political project which weakens the rule of law and the universality of human rights. Wherever these forces advance, the Protection systems are weakened, equality policies contested and violence relativized. The latest report from the High Council for Equality between Women and Men underlines that sexism remains deeply rooted in society and that it is experiencing forms of radicalization and trivialization, particularly under the effect of the massive diffusion of masculinist discourses in the public and digital space. Sexism remains a structural phenomenon, present in all spheres of society: family, school, work, institutions, digital space, etc. However, sexist and sexual violence constitutes its most brutal expression. The figures are clear: in France, 93% of major rape victims are women; 271,000 women suffer domestic violence each year; 160,000 children are victims of sexual violence and between 2017 and 2023, incidents recorded for sexual violence increased by 282%. Despite freedom of speech, impunity remains massive: in 2021, 94% of rape cases were dismissed. Judgment delays, lack of specialization, insufficient human and budgetary resources and the fragmentation of systems maintain a feeling of abandonment among many victims. Faced with the continuum of violence to women and children, the response can be neither partial nor fragmented. It must be global, coherent and structured. In 2017, the President of the Republic made equality between women and men a major cause of the five-year term. In 2022, child protection was placed at the same level of national priority. Bill No. 2169 aimed at comprehensively combating gender-based and sexual violence committed against women and children constitutes precisely the legislative tool to make these commitments a reality. It comes from the work of more than 150 feminist and children's organizations. Co-signed by 114 parliamentarians from eight political groups, it has a clearly transpartisan ambition. This text acts on all the levers: structural reform of justice, police training, creation of specialized courts, reinforced protection of children, prevention and treatment of violence at work, health and psychotraumatic care, fight against cyberviolence and new forms of exploitation, protection of particularly vulnerable people, etc. Not taking up this bill would amount to allowing an insufficient institutional response to systemic violence to persist. Her examination is possible: the President of the National Assembly and the President of the Senate have expressed their support for its necessary and rapid inclusion on the agenda. The credibility of the Minister's commitments and the effective protection of victims are at stake. She asks her if she intends to support the rapid inclusion of this bill on the agenda of the National Assembly; if she is willing to accompany her adoption in order to provide France with a global, coherent legislative framework commensurate with the scale of the violence and according to which timetable they intend to allow the examination and effective implementation of this comprehensive law.
Question· Question écrite12020open
France · National Assembly · 23 December 2025
Ms. Céline Thiébault-Martinez draws the attention of the Minister of Health, Families, Autonomy and People with Disabilities to the significant difficulties encountered by same-sex families regarding access to paternity leave and childcare, as well as certain essential family benefits. The Defender of Rights recognized that requiring a filiation condition not provided for by law constitutes discrimination based on family situation and undermines the best interests of the child. However, in practice, male couples remain excluded from several schemes during the birth of their child. Health insurance funds continue to refuse to apply the right to birth leave for the second parent in male couples, citing in particular the protection of the mother's health, which purely and simply denies the existence and rights of these families. This results in discrimination based on sex and family structure, contrary to Article 1 of the Constitution and the European Convention on Human Rights. In this context, she would like to know the measures that the Government is considering to guarantee that all parents, regardless of family configuration, can benefit from birth leave and associated benefits, and the actions planned to put an end to this discrimination and ensure real equality between all families from the birth of the child. Finally, it notes that, even though these problems remain, article 42 of the PLFSS 2026 provides for the creation of new additional birth leave, without the current difficulties encountered by male same-sex parent families having been previously taken into account. account. She therefore wants to know how the Government intends to prevent this new system from reproducing or aggravating existing inequalities.
Question· Question écrite11854open
France · National Assembly · 23 December 2025
Ms. Céline Thiébault-Martinez draws the attention of the Minister of Health, Families, Autonomy and People with Disabilities to the non-application of article 89 of Law No. 2023-1250 of December 26, 2023 on the financing of social security for 2024. The latter provides that the fund may request, from any public administration or organization managing social benefits, the information strictly necessary to identify and contact the beneficiaries of compensation for damages. The text also specifies that these data must be used exclusively in this context and that their processing is governed by a decree of the Council of State, taken after consulting the National Commission for Information Technology and Liberties (CNIL). However, despite the multiple interventions of the Association of Life Accidents (FNATH) and the commitments made during the last council of administration of FIVA, this decree has not been published to date and it seems that the obligatory opinion of the CNIL has not yet been requested. The analysis by FNATH, a member of the FIVA council, indicates that the fund's technical teams have worked fully on this subject and that the delay clearly comes from central administrations. This prolonged delay, which no longer has any justification two years before the promulgation of the law, constitutes a direct attack on the rights of asbestos victims and their dependents, many of whom are in emergency situations due to their state of health. As such, she would like to know the precise reasons for the delay in the publication of the decree implementing article 89 of the LFSS for 2024; the estimated date of its publication and that of requesting the opinion of the CNIL; the estimated number of victims and beneficiaries still affected by this delay and the measures envisaged so that these people can benefit as soon as possible from the compensation provided for by law.
Question· Question écrite11575answered
France · National Assembly · 9 December 2025
Ms. Céline Thiébault-Martinez draws the attention of the Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs to the necessary French contribution to the Global Fund to fight HIV, tuberculosis and malaria. France has made the fight against HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria a priority of its global health strategy and remains, historically, the second contributor to the global fund behind the United States of America. Since 2010, the The number of HIV infections has fallen by a third, and since 2002, AIDS-related deaths have fallen by 73% and new infections by 61% in countries where the global fund invests. By 2023, the global fund had made it possible to provide treatment to 25 million people, helping to save millions of lives. However, these decades of progress are now threatened by the cessation of certain international funding and by cuts in public development assistance. The last replenishment of the global fund's resources, in November 2025, took place without a French contribution announcement, for the first time since the creation of the fund in 2002. This absence has a considerable human cost: it could lead to the death of 2 million people and compromise the progress made in the fight against HIV/AIDS. The Member wishes therefore know what is the precise amount that France intends to pay to the global fund for the current funding cycle and calls on the Government to maintain at least the 2022 contribution level, in order to continue to concretely support prevention, screening and treatment programs and to protect the most vulnerable populations. She wants to know the perspectives on this subject.
Question· Question écrite10620answered
France · National Assembly · 28 October 2025
Ms. Céline Thiébault-Martinez draws the attention of the Minister Delegate to the Prime Minister, responsible for equality between women and men and the fight against discrimination, to the absence, to date, of the implementing decree providing for the revaluation of financial assistance for social and professional integration (AFIS) at the level of the lump sum of the RSA, a measure provided for by the finance law for 2025. The AFIS is a allowance intended for people engaged in a journey out of prostitution. It aims to provide them with essential temporary financial support to facilitate their social and professional integration, in particular by compensating for the loss of income linked to leaving the prostitution system. This system helps to create the material conditions enabling these people to rebuild their autonomy and make a lasting commitment. in an integration pathway. As part of the examination of the finance bill for 2025, the joint joint committee allocated 2 million euros in additional credits to program 137, with a view to increasing the amount of financial assistance for social and professional integration (AFIS) so that it reaches the fixed level of active solidarity income (RSA). If the amount of the RSA remains insufficient to fully withdraw the people affected by precariousness, this revaluation nevertheless constitutes progress expected by associations, in particular by the Federation of Solidarity Actors (FAS), to support beneficiaries engaged in a journey out of prostitution, for whom AFIS represents vital assistance. However, the absence of an implementing decree modifying the monthly amount of the AFIS prevents the effective implementation of this measure. yet essential to the social and professional support of the people concerned. While the information report by senators Arnaud Bazin and Pierre Barros, entitled “Evolution of financing of the fight against violence against women” and published in July 2025 underlines the urgency of this revaluation and calls for a rapid publication of the implementing decree, this recommendation has not yet provoked a reaction or official response from the Government. Given the importance of this revaluation to combat precariousness and promote sustainable integration, it asks it to specify the timetable it intends to follow for the publication of the decree, so that this measure can be quickly implemented.
Question· Question écrite9152answered
France · National Assembly · 29 July 2025
Ms. Céline Thiébault-Martinez draws the attention of the Minister to the Minister of Labor, Health, Solidarity and Families, responsible for health and access to care, to the need to adopt an inclusive approach in the plan to combat gender-based and sexual violence (SGBV) in health settings, recently announced. Since 2014, gynecological and obstetric violence, long kept silent, has begun to be made visible, in particular through the hashtag #PayeTonUtérus. Many women testify, in the privacy of medical consultations or during childbirth, of violent gestures or comments, or experienced as such. These practices sometimes reflect sexist behavior, revealing an imbalance of power in the relationship between caregivers and patients. This violence constitutes a form of appropriation of women's bodies and their reproductive process. The health divide, the worrying decrease in the number of gynecologists throughout the country, as well as the continued deterioration of working conditions in health establishments, constitute all structural factors which favor the persistence of this violence. Judicial news, marked by the trial of Joël Le Scouarnec, is a strong reminder of the scale and seriousness of the violence sexual abuse that patients may be victims of within healthcare establishments. This trial demonstrates the urgency of global and ambitious government action. In this context, the plan to combat SGBV in health announced on January 17, 2025 by the Minister constitutes a welcome initiative. However, VSS suffered by patients will not be affected by the measures of this plan. To fully respond to the challenges, this plan must include all audiences concerned: patients, healthcare professionals and students. It is imperative that victims are listened to and that their words are taken into account at each stage of the system. In this regard, the MP insists on the need to involve associations representing patients such as the VSS Health Collective, in consultations linked to the development, implementation and following this plan. Their expertise, from the field, is essential to construct appropriate, concrete and effective responses. The MP therefore asks that this plan to combat VSS in health have a global approach and fight effectively against all VSS in health of which health professionals, students but also patients can be victims.
Question· Question écrite9117answered
France · National Assembly · 29 July 2025
Ms. Céline Thiébault-Martinez draws the attention of the Minister to the Minister of Labor, Health, Solidarity and Families, responsible for health and access to care, to the extremely worrying situation of several hospital practitioners and associated practitioners qualified outside the European Union (PADHUE) working at the Grand Hôpital de l'Est Francilien (GHEF). Between 2020 and 2024, these doctors – around fifty – were recruited by the GHEF, which paid them bonuses in order to encourage them to join the establishment and ensure the functioning of its services. These bonuses represented between 30% and 50% of their salary and were included in their employment contracts. They aimed in particular to ensure decent remuneration for these doctors, often foreigners, and to compensate for the fact that many of them work between 60 and 70 hours per week, i.e. more than the maximum authorized working time. The management, renewed in 2023, considers that the bonuses paid – which sometimes represented up to 70% of the remuneration of these practitioners – were unduly collected, although they were provided for in contracts validated by the hospitals themselves. After informing them of her desire to suspend these payments, she is now demanding their reimbursement. The situation is ludicrous: these doctors, who work between 60 and 70 hours per week, today receive between 1,500 and 2,000 euros net per month, for a workload equivalent to that of their tenured counterparts, paid three to four times more. They are now ordered to return the bonuses received between 2023 and 2025, for amounts of up to 100,000 euros per person. This decision places these professionals in a situation of extreme precariousness and arouses deep incomprehension, even though their commitment has been essential, particularly during the health crisis. The social cost is enormous, as these caregivers can no longer trust their public employer, who is trying to make them bear the burden of their own fault, their departure from the GHEF would force the closure of several services and some are already on sick leave. Moreover, the very legal appropriateness of this approach on the part of the GHEF management is itself questionable. The decision of the Council of State dating from October 12, 2009 testifies to this: "the decision of July 1, 1904, Navaggioni, sees in the erroneous payments made by the administration and the delays in ordering the repayment of faults likely to engage the responsibility of the public authorities" (no. 310300). The Council of State in is regularly applied and “in the event that nothing can be blamed on the victim, the latter receives compensation equal to the overpayment”. This situation clearly illustrates the way in which PADHUE doctors, whether already recognized or in the process of being validated, are treated in the operation of the public hospital. Too often considered as cheap labor, they face conditions of degraded work, a lack of recognition, or even real contempt on the part of certain managements. And yet, their role is crucial, particularly in the fight against medical desertification. Today, nearly 80% of French territory is affected by a shortage of health professionals. These doctors are essential to guarantee access to care for all French people. She asks what Measures the Government intends to put in place to legally secure the employment conditions of these caregivers and to avoid these reimbursement requests with dramatic consequences, in order to guarantee them fair recognition of their work.
Question· Question écrite8538answered
France · National Assembly · 15 July 2025
Ms. Céline Thiébault-Martinez draws the attention of the Minister of State, Minister of the Interior, to the persistent malfunctions of the ANEF platform (Digital Administration for Foreigners in France) and their consequences on access to the rights of foreigners. Since its gradual generalization to all residence permits, the ANEF platform has been the subject of strong criticism from those in the field, due to significant obstacles that it poses to users, particularly the most precarious. If decree no. 2021-313 of March 24, 2021 makes it possible to make the use of a teleservice compulsory, the Council of State recalled, in a decision of June 3, 2022, that this obligation can only be implemented on the condition of ensuring effective support and suitable alternative solutions. However, a national survey carried out by the Federation of solidarity actors, made public in October 2024, documents in depth the extent of the dysfunctions observed on the ground. Of more than 480 structures questioned, 82% believe that the Citizen Contact Center (CCC) does not provide any concrete help to users and only 5% declare that their prefecture systematically offers a substitute method in the event of a blockage. Nearly 70% indicate total absence clear information on prefectural sites. Even more worrying, these technical and organizational failures lead to breaches of rights: loss of access to social benefits (CAF, CPAM), removal from France Travail, inability to work or find housing. These situations plunge certain people into dramatic administrative precariousness, with lasting consequences on their social integration and professional. These findings were shared by the Defender of Rights in her November 2024 report, which mentions “massive attacks on users’ rights” and calls for an immediate strengthening of guarantees of accessibility and continuity of public service. The Defender underlines in particular the unsuitability of the measures for vulnerable groups and the need to guarantee true multi-channel access to procedures, in accordance with the principles of equality in public service. In this context, she wishes to know what measures the Government intends to take to guarantee real and fair access to administrative procedures linked to stay, ensure compliance with the substitution arrangements provided for by the decree of August 1, 2023 and restore the effectiveness of the fundamental rights of foreign people present on the territory, in particular those who encounter technical or linguistic obstacles in the use of digital technology.
Question· Question écrite7044answered
France · National Assembly · 27 May 2025
Ms. Céline Thiébault-Martinez draws the attention of the Minister to the Minister of Labor, Health, Solidarity and Families, responsible for health and access to care, to the deleterious effects of Decree No. 2022-734 of April 28, 2022 on the economic balance of independent residences. Independent residences welcome independent elderly people wishing to live in a secure environment, while maintaining their independence while benefiting from optional services. As medico-social establishments falling under 6° of I of Article L. 312-1 of the Social Action and Families Code (CASF), they are subject to specific legal and financial supervision, unlike other forms of housing for the elderly. The decree of April 28, 2022, by modifying article R. 314-204 of the CASF, requires that, for absences of more than 72 hours for cause hospitalization, the amount of the daily rate of an establishment welcoming elderly people is reduced from the hospital package, which is currently 20 euros per day of hospitalization. This measure targets EHPADs and independent residences without distinction. However, if this rule is relevant for EHPADs, which can actually make savings when residents are hospitalized in that they do not have expenses for consumables (food, protection, etc.), it is unsuitable for independent residences. An independent residence with a monthly rent of 500 euros will not receive any rent from the resident hospitalized for 25 days (common duration for elderly people, particularly in the event of rehabilitation following an operation), even though the accommodation cannot be rented to another person. On the other hand, the decree provides for a reduction in the daily rate for absences of more than 72 hours for personal convenience, depending on variable catering and hotel costs. This provision should in no case apply to independent residences, where catering is optional and not included in the accommodation price, unlike EHPADs where catering is compulsory and therefore included in the daily accommodation price. In a context of aging population and growing needs for accessible intermediate housing, this provision directly threatens the viability of structures that are nevertheless essential, often supported by local authorities and approved by APL. She therefore wishes to know whether the Government intends to exclude independent residences from the scope of the decree of April 28, 2022, in order to guarantee fair treatment consistent with their reality. functioning.
Question· Question écrite5260answered
France · National Assembly · 25 March 2025
Ms. Céline Thiébault-Martinez calls on the Minister of the Economy, Finance and Industrial and Digital Sovereignty on the worsening of over-indebtedness in France and the lack of transparency on this subject, particularly on the profits generated by banking establishments. According to the Banque de France, the number of filings for overindebtedness increased by 12% over the first ten months of 2024. This worrying increase is largely linked to increasing difficulties for households to meet their current expenses. However, if these figures demonstrate an economic weakening of households, the data remains insufficient to establish a truly effective national policy for preventing over-indebtedness. Faced with this situation, associations have been warning for several years about the opacity surrounding bank charges applied to people in difficulty. THE Updated statistics on the profits made by banks through these fees, particularly in relation to the increase in the number of over-indebted people, remain largely insufficient. In this context, she wishes to know what measures the Government intends to take to ensure better statistical monitoring of over-indebtedness and its financial impact. She also asks him if a thorough investigation into the profits made by banks thanks to the fees applied to over-indebted households is envisaged in order to improve the regulation and transparency of the banking sector on this subject.
Question· Question écrite4051open
France · National Assembly · 11 February 2025
Ms. Céline Thiébault-Martinez alerts the Minister to the Minister of Labor, Health, Solidarity and Families, responsible for health and access to care, on the alarming situation of access to care in his department and more particularly on the sudden closure of teleconsultation booths, a first-resort system, essential for residents of areas under-resourced with health professionals. Friday September 27 2024, the department of Seine-et-Marne announced the permanent closure of the ten teleconsultation booths installed since 2020. This decision follows the judicial liquidation of the company H4D, responsible for their management. These cabins, present in towns like Brie-Comte-Robert and Grisy-Suisnes, played a crucial role in access to care for populations already facing a serious shortage of doctors. With only 5.7 general practitioners per 10,000 inhabitants in 2021, compared to a national average of 14.7, Seine-et-Marne ranks 98th out of 101 departments in terms of medical density. Medical desertification is particularly acute there and these cabins allowed residents to benefit from a consultation within a reasonable time and without having to travel long distances. The judicial liquidation of the company H4D and the sudden closure of the cabins sowed confusion and dismay among the population and local elected officials. The H4D company has received significant financial support from public authorities. No later than December 2023, during the issue of a bond loan in the amount of 5,862,798 euros, Bpifrance participation acquired a debt of 2,406,685 euros. In addition, between 2021 and 2023, the H4D company received 1,412,765 euros in research tax credit and 186,993 euros of innovation tax credit. How could such decisions have been taken without any warning being issued beforehand? Was the ministry aware of the deterioration in the financial situation of the company H4D and the risks this posed to thousands of citizens dependent on this system? The MP also asks the Minister what concrete measures and The Government intends to take immediate measures to remedy the medical shortage which particularly affects departments such as Seine-et-Marne. As the representative of a territory which is among the worst ranked in terms of access to care, she wishes to know what lasting solutions will be implemented to ensure a better territorial network in terms of health care. Finally, she questions him about the arrangements future plans that the Government intends to propose to prevent a similar situation from recurring: could monitoring and alert mechanisms not be put in place so that elected officials and residents are not caught off guard, as was the case here; it demands rapid responses and concrete commitments so as not to leave the inhabitants of Seine-et-Marne in such a critical situation.
Question· Question écrite3969answered
France · National Assembly · 11 February 2025
Ms. Céline Thiébault-Martinez draws the attention of the Minister of Ecological Transition, Biodiversity, Forests, Sea and Fisheries to the noise and environmental pollution caused by aviation, which affects a significant number of French people, particularly with regard to light aviation. As the transition towards more environmentally friendly means of transport intensifies, the MP judges It is striking to note that particularly noisy planes, still using leaded fuel, continue to fly over residential areas and educational establishments every day, without specific regulation. The MP underlines that in France, no regulations currently govern these flights, authorized 365 days a year, which contributes to worrying noise and air pollution. On the edge of his constituency, the Lognes aerodrome creates so much nuisance that an association was formed to challenge the public authorities. Recalling that some European neighbors, such as Germany, have already introduced measures to limit the nuisances of this aviation and protect their citizens, she asks when France will take similar measures by adopting strict regulations for aviation and in particular for aviation. light, with the aim of preserving the health and well-being of local residents.