Records
14 records where Laurent Mazaury is listed as a sponsor, author, or other actor. Search with topics and years
Question· Question écrite17394open
France · National Assembly · 28 July 2026
Mr Laurent Mazaury draws the attention of the Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs to the situation of women and girls victims of kidnapping and sexual violence in times of conflict in Nigeria. On February 19, 2018, one hundred and ten young girls were kidnapped by a faction of Boko Haram (ISWAP) from the public school in Dapchi, Yobe State. If almost all of them have since been released, Leah Sharibu, then aged fourteen, remains in captivity to this day, eight years after her kidnapping, for refusing to renounce her Christian faith. Testimonies from released fellow prisoners speak of forced marriage, successive pregnancies in captivity and repeated sexual violence. This situation is not isolated. On June 8, 2026, five experts from the United Nations Human Rights Council called on Nigerian authorities to take action immediate measures to protect women and girls at risk and to obtain the release of those who remain captive. Amnesty International also estimated the number of people kidnapped in Nigeria at more than 1,100 during the first three months of 2026. Such acts, when they take place in the context of armed conflict and specifically target women and young girls because of their membership religious, are likely to be qualified as war crimes or crimes against humanity within the meaning of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. He asks him to please specify the actions undertaken by France, both at the bilateral level and within the relevant multilateral forums, in particular the United Nations Human Rights Council, to support efforts in favor of the release of Leah Sharibu and other women and girls held captive in Nigeria and to support the Nigerian authorities in preventing these kidnappings and protecting the most vulnerable populations.
Question· Question écrite15832open
France · National Assembly · 9 June 2026
Mr. Laurent Mazaury alerts the Minister of National Education to the multiple failures in the support policy for students with disabilities, particularly those relating to the opacity of data transmitted to mayors on the execution of MDPH notifications, to the relevance of ministerial AESH coverage statistics and to persistent shortcomings in the application of Law No. 2024-475 of May 27, 2024 concerning the midday break. Firstly, Article L. 112-1 of the Education Code provides that “the State puts in place the financial and human resources necessary for the education in ordinary settings of children, adolescents or adults with disabilities”, the implementation of which falls to the mayors, responsible for school premises, catering and extracurricular time. However, in reality, mayors do not have any periodic document and formalized allowing them to verify that the notifications issued by the departmental centers for disabled people (MDPH) are fully executed within the territory of their municipality. This opacity is all the more worrying since the joint IGESR-IGAS report published in 2026 itself recognizes a “persistent gap between the growing need for support resulting from notifications of human aid by MDPHs and the capacity to response of national education” and that the European Committee of Social Rights has, in its decision of October 19, 2022, condemned France for breaching the European Social Charter, noting in particular that “short contracts and unattractive remuneration of AESH often lead to disruptions in schooling or incomplete schooling for students with disabilities”. Secondly, the responses given to recent written questions, in particular those of Mr. Éric Michoux (no. 9096, OJ of July 29, 2025), Mr. Julien Gokel (no. 3369, OJ of January 21, 2025) and Ms. Gabrielle Cathala (no. 10124, OJ of October 7, 2025) were all based on the same argument: salary increases, the creation of 11,000 additional positions since 2022 and the increase in the number of students supported. These data, if accurate, however mask a reality very different. The Department of Evaluation, Foresight and Performance (DEPP) itself noted that “the AESHs declare that they intervene in practice with a number of students 1.6 times higher on average than those subject to notification”. Even more serious: the 2026 IGESR-IGAS report confirms that “10% of notified children remain without human support”, a figure to which are added all the students benefiting from support less than the prescribed hours. In 2025, 42,000 students with disabilities were without AESH, at least partially, an increase of 33% in one year. However, the statistical method currently used by the ministry counts as “met need” any student who has received any hour of support, even if the CDAPH notification prescribes twenty hours per week and the student does not receive any. only gets two. This approach amounts to aggregating, in the same numerator, situations of full support and situations of virtual school dropout, thus producing statistics that do not reflect the entire reality. This practice also comes into direct contradiction with the State's obligations arising from Article L. 112-2 of the Education Code, according to which the State "mobilizes the necessary resources" for the effective schooling, as well as with France's international commitments under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD, ratified in 2010), article 24 of which requires quality inclusive education. The European Committee of Social Rights had also noted this in 2022: “students with disabilities find themselves excluded from certain courses and activities” due to lack of resources adapted and families are forced to submit their file each year for notification which, in practice, is not carried out. Finally, lastly, Law No. 2024-475 of May 27, 2024, adopted unanimously by both chambers, entrusted the State with financial and organizational responsibility for supporting students with disabilities during the lunch break. A first implementing decree (n° 2025-137 of 14 February 2025) clarified the conditions for exercising AESH over this time. However, the memo of July 25, 2024 which established the operational modalities was repealed by a memo of June 4, 2025, without the AESH management framework having been updated in return. In fact, many municipalities report that the agreement planned between the State and the communities has not been concluded, that the rectorates do not do not have sufficient human resources to respond to requests and that mayors find themselves unable to act, as the State does not take its responsibilities. The CDAPH, whose decisions to grant human assistance remain legally limited to school time in application of article L. 351-3 of the education code, has no jurisdiction to prescribe support during the lunch break. If the law of May 27, 2024 now places the responsibility on the State to provide this support, it does not specify either the competent authority to assess this specific need, nor the terms of its evaluation, leaving a margin of administrative appreciation likely to weaken the effectiveness of the right to disability compensation. In short, the CDAPH could previously award an AESH to a student in need within the framework of the meridian break; however, in the absence of such a note, it can now only make recommendations that are otherwise non-enforceable. This lack of framework is harmful for students. In this context, the MP questions the Minister on the measures he intends to take so that a territorialized, detailed and regular inventory of the implementation of MDPH notifications is drawn up, distinguishing between the notifications fully executed, partially executed, not executed and for this this inventory is transmitted to the mayors of the municipalities concerned. Also, he would like to know the assessment that the Government draws up of the application of Law No. 2024-475 since its entry into force and what concrete measures it plans to take to remedy the dysfunctions observed since the start of the 2025 school year.
Question· Question écrite13578answered
France · National Assembly · 17 March 2026
Mr. Laurent Mazaury draws the attention of the Minister of the Economy, Finance and Industrial, Energy and Digital Sovereignty to the sudden and unjustified increase in fuel prices observed in service stations, particularly in the 11th district of Yvelines. Since the start of the escalation of tensions in the Middle East in March 2026, prices at the pump have jumped by more than 10 cents per liter in a few days. The argument systematically put forward by distributors is the risk of blocking the Strait of Hormuz. However, the MP would like to point out that oil transiting through this strait represents less than 4% of French imports of crude oil. The country's dependence on this geographical area is therefore marginal. Nothing, in terms of actual supply flows, justifies an immediate impact of such magnitude on the portfolio of the French. This situation raises fears of abusive speculation on stocks purchased well before the start of tensions. While the inhabitants of Yvelines, many of whom are dependent on their vehicles to work, are already experiencing persistent inflation, this additional drain is unacceptable. He asks him what emergency measures the Government intends to take to initiate strict controls on the margins of oil companies and distributors via the DGCCRF, but also sanction speculative behavior which is based on a geopolitical pretext without technical basis for France and, finally, guarantee total transparency on the origin of the refined oil currently sold at the pump.
Question· Question écrite13385answered
France · National Assembly · 10 March 2026
Mr. Laurent Mazaury draws the attention of the Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs to the decision of the management of TV5 Monde to cancel the political program “Face aux Territoires”, which threatens both the diversity of the French-speaking media offering, the economic balance of the regional daily press (PQR) and the employment of the channel's intermittent technicians. This show, co-produced and entirely financed by the PQR, was in fact suddenly removed at the end of last year by the CEO Ms. Kim Younes, on the grounds that it did not fit into the channel's “strategic plan”. However, it fulfilled an essential public service mission: it offered a unique platform for French political leaders to address both the territories (including overseas) and internationally, thanks to its broadcast on TV5 Monde and on the local channels of TNT, as well as on the sites of partner regional daily newspapers (Ouest-France, La Provence, Nice Matin, La Voix du Nord, France-Antilles, etc.). This decision is all the more surprising given that the show was a real success in terms of exposure, provided significant revenue to TV5 Monde and supported an already fragile regional media ecosystem, in the run-up to the municipal elections and the next presidential and presidential elections. legislative. Its removal deprives citizens, in France and around the world, of a new and accessible political space. Furthermore, the production of the show on the TV5 Monde set made it possible to maintain activity for the channel's intermittent technicians, who are currently suffering. Instead, the management launched a program on contemporary art, at a cost of 1.4 million euros, which does not seem to make much of a difference. audience and is an “industrial accident” in terms of digital broadcasting. In this context, he asks the Government if it intends to intervene so that “Facing the Territories” is reintegrated into TV5 Monde's strategic plan.
Question· Question écrite12586open
France · National Assembly · 3 February 2026
Mr. Laurent Mazaury draws the attention of the Minister of the Economy, Finance and Industrial, Energy and Digital Sovereignty to the authorization given by the Government to the sale of the company LMB Aerospace to the American group Loar Group. He recalls that LMB Aerospace, a French industrial player specializing in the manufacture of electric motors and fans intended for aeronautical and defense platforms, participates in sensitive programs such as the Dassault Rafale plane, the Leclerc tank and the Charles-de-Gaulle aircraft carrier. It notes that, according to information recently confirmed in the press by the Government, this transfer was authorized within the framework of the system for controlling foreign investments in France, despite the reluctance expressed by the General Directorate of Armaments and other competent services of the ministry of the armed forces. He underlines that the executive claims to have attached this authorization to conditions intended to protect national interests, in particular the maintenance in France of strategic activity and the modernization of industrial capacities, as well as the acquisition by the State of a preferential action conferring power of control over certain assets. In this context, he asks him to specify the elements of appreciation having led the Government to authorize this acquisition by a foreign group, in particular in view of the contradictory opinions of the defense services and the issues of national sovereignty. The legal and industrial guarantees imposed on the purchaser, detailing the specific commitments, control clauses and monitoring mechanisms put in place to ensure the lasting protection of know-how, capacities industrial and strategic supply chains. The modalities for implementing the conditions announced by the Government, in particular State intervention via preferential action or other governance instruments and measures to prevent risks linked to foreign possession of equipment integrated into sensitive defense programs. The lessons that the executive intends to draw from this file to the evolution of the foreign investment control system, in order to better respond to the challenges of economic sovereignty and national security in sectors directly linked to defense.
Question· Question écrite11309open
France · National Assembly · 2 December 2025
Mr. Laurent Mazaury draws the attention of the Minister of the Economy, Finance and Industrial, Energy and Digital Sovereignty to the entry of the Chinese group JD.com into the capital of the Fnac Darty group, to the tune of approximately 22%, via the indirect acquisition of the stake previously held by the German group Ceconomy. This operation, validated under conditions by the Ministry of the Economy, provides that JD.com remains a shareholder “ dormant”, deprived of any governance rights, and that he undertakes not to increase his participation in the company. However, government communication remains fragmented: neither the exact nature of the commitments made, nor the planned control methods, nor the associated legal safeguards have been made public. Fnac Darty is not a company like any other: it is the leading distributor of cultural goods in France, particularly books, and a central player in the dissemination of cultural works, technologies and multimedia services. In this context, the entry of a foreign investor, from a country whose companies are subject to legal obligations of cooperation with the State, raises crucial questions about editorial independence, freedom of dissemination of works, cultural diversity, data protection of consumers and the security of technological infrastructures. In view of the issues raised and the unprecedented nature of this participation, he asks it to please provide answers to the following questions: what are the precise guarantees imposed on JD.com to prohibit any influence on the governance of Fnac Darty and what are the limitations associated with its economic and financial rights? What legal measures have been put in place to prevent any circumvention of these commitments, in particular via subsidiaries, affiliated entities or indirect participations? How can the State ensure that no direct or indirect increase by JD.com in the capital of Fnac Darty occurs without its authorization? A specific assessment of the risks linked to editorial independence, cultural diversity and Has freedom of distribution of works been achieved, taking into account the central role of Fnac Darty in French cultural distribution? What analyzes have been carried out to assess the risks linked to digital security, consumer data protection and technological dependence on an actor subject to Chinese legal obligations? Is the Government planning to strengthen the control system for foreign investments in order to explicitly include the distribution of cultural goods, recommendation platforms and digital access infrastructures? What monitoring methods will be implemented to sustainably verify compliance with the commitments made by JD.com and what sanctions or authorization withdrawal levers will the State be able to activate in the event of a breach? He wants to know his position on this subject.
Question· Question écrite10387answered
France · National Assembly · 21 October 2025
Mr. Laurent Mazaury draws the attention of the Minister Delegate to the Minister of the Economy, Finance and Industrial, Energy and Digital Sovereignty, responsible for industry, to the situation of the French automotive sector which is going through a structural and cyclical crisis marked by different factors, such as the reduction in production volumes or geopolitical instability which is making the chains more complex supply. It is urgent to support this sector in its restructuring, in order to avoid a loss of skills in the territories and preserve employment and know-how. The territories of the agglomerations of Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines and the Greater Paris Seine and Oise Urban Community (GPS and O) represent a large part of the direct and indirect regional employment in the sector. It is therefore essential for them that the State can help them support the reconversion of this sector. Aware of France's national and international challenges, they offer solutions to emerge from the crisis but also to turn the latter into an economic and strategic opportunity and strengthen the country's industrial sovereignty. From this perspective, reorienting the automotive sector towards land defense markets could be a solution to be encouraged. It should be noted that Germany has already largely initiated developments in this direction. Indeed, the skills that can be mobilized in the sector (precision machining, on-board electronics, bodywork, assembly, control software and on-board AI, electric or hybrid propulsion, just-in-time logistics and industrial management) could, without a doubt, meet the growing needs of the armed forces. Nevertheless, Access for SMEs from the automotive sector to defense markets faces several obstacles: complexity of the DGA's market procedures, difficulties in responding to public contracts, lack of clarity on medium-term needs, difficulties in achieving the necessary certification levels, poor structuring of downstream sectors around SMEs. To remove these obstacles, the two cities are coming up with proposals concrete and innovative: creation of “SME Defense” intermediary markets, creation of an “Automobile-Defense skills transfer” label, establishment of a DGA-Territories window or even deployment of local experiments. In this context, he asks for the Government's guidelines to support the automotive sector and whether the above-mentioned solutions could be considered.
Question· Question écrite10275answered
France · National Assembly · 14 October 2025
Mr. Laurent Mazaury draws the attention of the Minister of Transformation and Public Service, Artificial Intelligence and Digital Technology to the taking into account of the reduction in activity for the education of a child in the context of the retirement of public officials. The civil and military retirement pensions code today makes a distinction between children born before January 1, 2004 and those born after this date. For the two, the law and the implementing decrees today allow parents, father or mother, to obtain a bonus based on the percentage and duration of the part-time period completed. However, article R. 13 taken pursuant to b of article 12, in force between 1964 and 2004, provided for the bonus provided only for women civil servants. Also, the MP was alerted to the fact that this article, although amended on various occasions, still penalized fathers who had decided before 2004 to reduce their professional activity to look after their child. In this context, he asks what measures the Government could take to ensure that these inequalities cease and that all reductions in activity, for children born before or after January 1, 2004, are taken into account and improved.
Question· Question écrite10264answered
France · National Assembly · 14 October 2025
Mr. Laurent Mazaury draws the attention of the Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs to attacks on Tibetan culture and language in Tibet. The Chinese authorities recently decided that Tibetan would no longer be a compulsory subject for the national entrance exam to the University of Tibet from 2026. This is an additional attack against the Tibetan language, which for several years has been attacked by the Chinese government. In 2023, UN experts were already concerned about Chinese policies against Tibetans and their cultural heritage, denouncing their forced assimilation, in particular through the placement of children in boarding schools. The same year, the European Parliament adopted a resolution on the abduction of Tibetan children and forced assimilation practices in Chinese boarding schools in Tibet. According to sociologist Gyal Lo, Chinese became the only language of instruction, with Tibetan representing only three-quarters of an hour of instruction over an eight-hour day. Tibetan children are required from the age of 4 to go to a boarding school. 90% of them are now distant from their families geographically, but also culturally. When they return home, sometimes after several months of absence for nomadic families, communication is broken because children and parents no longer speak the same language. According to Mr. Gyal Lo, if this policy is maintained, 70% of Tibetans will no longer be able to speak their language in 2060. Parents have no choice but to put their children in these boarding schools: other school options (public schools, teaching centers in monasteries) are closed and, if they do not accept boarding in kindergarten, they are threatened with not being able to enroll their children in school and their social assistance will be withdrawn. While Tibetan culture has existed for several millennia, it has been under attack by the Chinese Government for years and measures against it are intensifying. Furthermore, it seems that this policy has strong repercussions on the success of Tibetan students, because they must learn the different subjects of the school curriculum in a language which is not their mother tongue. Also, the risk of dropping out of school and taking low-skilled jobs is greater for the Tibetan community. It is possible that this policy participates in another developed by the Chinese authorities to meet the labor needs of China which, since 2020, has carried out massive transfers of nomads and farmers Tibetans in businesses. In this context, he asks what measures he intends to take to carry France's voice within the European Union and international bodies to defend Tibetan culture and language and China's respect for international obligations, in particular the Convention on the Rights of the Child, which it has ratified.
Question· Question écrite6841answered
France · National Assembly · 20 May 2025
Mr. Laurent Mazaury draws the attention of the Minister of State, Minister of the Interior, to the regulations in force concerning the use of aircraft without passengers on board. Companies and communities that use drones for their activities are particularly concerned about the provisions in force and those that will soon be effective. First of all, the “space” decree of December 3, 2020, by its article 5, prohibits flying over public spaces in built-up areas without prior authorization from the prefect for “open” category drones. This measure could be justified by the exceptional and necessary security measures put in place in the context of the Paris 2024 Olympic Games. However, despite the end of the Olympic Games, the decree of December 3, 2020 has not been modified. This ban poses a problem for professional users of drones in the context where European provisions will change from January 1, 2026 and will largely impact their activity. Indeed, European Union Implementing Regulation 2019/947, in force since 2020, allowed France to maintain its national scenarios, in particular concerning remote pilot diplomas and the drones used. However, this regulation has been modified. Thus, from January 1, 2026, the European regulations will lead to the abandonment of French national scenarios (S1, S2, S3) in favor of European standard scenarios (STS-01, STS-02) and categories A1, A2, A3, implying a significant economic cost for companies and communities dependent on aircraft without passengers on board which must completely renew their fleet. For example, the agglomeration of Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines today has three drones, but two of them will no longer be usable and the third will have to have new equipment which will cost 1,500 euros. There are also costs linked to obtaining European diplomas (the CATS, certificate of theoretical aptitude for remote pilot for standard scenarios, replacing the CATT, certificate of aptitude for remote piloting of technological drones) and the financing of practical training. In this context, it asks him what actions the Government intends to take to respond to the concerns of professional drone users, who fear a strong impact on their economic activities.
Question· Question écrite6215answered
France · National Assembly · 29 April 2025
Mr. Laurent Mazaury draws the attention of the Minister of Labor, Health, Solidarity and Families to lipedema disease, recognized by the WHO since 2018, and which affects 10% of women in France, but which is however not recognized by social security. However, the health insurance website clearly defines the symptoms associated with lipedema: feeling of heaviness in the legs, painful and hypersensitive legs. especially to the touch, appearance of bruises or hematomas following minor shocks, general fatigue and psychological suffering. Lipedema can be relieved, but not cured, by sporting activity and a balanced anti-inflammatory diet. However, this chronic, progressive and painful disease, which consists of a significant and abnormal accumulation of fat, localized in particular in the lower limbs of the body, has different stages, 3 and 4 of which are particularly debilitating for women who suffer from it. This disease is often confused with obesity or cellulite even though it requires appropriate care. Women who suffer from it are therefore faced with medical wandering, leading to a high cost for them but also for social security. For stages 3 and 4, specific lipoedema liposuctions are necessary, but are very expensive and are not reimbursed. According to the president of the AMFL (Lipoedema Disease Association France), some women end up prostituting themselves to be able to afford this operation, because otherwise, for them, it means living with chronic pain and losing their mobility. In this context, he asks what measures the Government intends to take to deal with medical wandering concerning this disease, and to guarantee that all the necessary care is provided, from the early stages, so that women who suffer from it no longer suffer.
Question· Question écrite5028answered
France · National Assembly · 18 March 2025
M. Laurent Mazaury attire l'attention de Mme la ministre de la culture sur la muséologie du musée national des arts asiatiques Guimet. Avant 2024, les œuvres tibétaines et népalaises se trouvaient dans une salle appelée « Tibet-Népal ». Depuis 2024, ces œuvres appartiennent à un espace de l'exposition permanent dénommé « Monde himalayen ». Cette modification concerne également le lieu d'origine de ces œuvres. Alors que leur description indiquait la mention « Tibet », elles sont désormais étiquetées comme « art tibétain ». L'argument selon lequel la présentation des collections se ferait désormais par « aires culturelles » ne tient pas, dès lors qu'il existe toujours des salles dénommées « Afghanistan-Pakistan », « Japon » ou encore « Corée ». Le message politique d'un tel changement est particulièrement malheureux, puisqu'il suppose que le Tibet n'a pas eu d'existence historique propre en dehors de la Chine. Plus encore, il laisse imaginer que le discours officiel de la République populaire de Chine, qui occupe illégalement le Tibet depuis 1950, est partagé par les autorités du musée Guimet. La nomenclature des collections relève, au sein du ministère de la culture, du service des musées de France, qui émet des recommandations sur les mots à utiliser pour décrire les objets conservés par les musées français. Il semblerait cependant que ce sujet, hautement politique, ne soit pas traité de manière spécifique. Le musée du Quai Branly-Jacques Chirac avait également été concerné par ce phénomène, avant de faire marche arrière. Il lui demande quelles actions elle peut mettre en œuvre auprès des opérateurs qui relèvent de sa tutelle afin que la culture et l'histoire du peuple tibétain soient reconnues de manière indépendante des œuvres issues de la culture chinoise.
Question· Question écrite4146answered
France · National Assembly · 18 February 2025
Mr. Laurent Mazaury draws the attention of the Minister of Labor, Health, Solidarity and Families to the difficulties encountered by caregivers and the need for better national coordination to strengthen access to respite stays as part of the government strategy. The number of overstretched caregivers has increased significantly in recent years, reaching almost 11 million, mainly due to of the aging of the population. These caregivers, essential to the daily care of millions of vulnerable people, are exposed to serious psychosocial risks: sleep disorders, exhaustion, overwork, even depression. Although respite mechanisms exist, their access remains unequal and their financing fragmented. According to a study by the France Répit Foundation, 53% of caregivers say they lack daily respite, a need significantly greater than lack of financial support (25%). More serious, according to Silver Eco, 30% of caregivers die before their sick or disabled loved one. These data illustrate the urgency of consolidating the respite offer within the framework of the second multi-annual national strategy 2023-2027, which is committed in particular to strengthening access to these systems. The current obstacles to access to respite stays result from the breakdown of offers and diversity of financing. This penalizes caregivers as much as operators. It seems essential to strengthen coordination between national and local actors to create a more understandable and equitable framework. If the existing respite systems mainly focus on the temporary care of the person being cared for (accommodation, day care, relay), few of them include an offer specifically intended to directly support and accompany caregivers themselves, which constitutes a major gap. Supplementary pension funds, grouped within Agirc-Arrco, play a central role but their intervention remains heterogeneous from one territory to another. Likewise, civil service pension funds are still little involved in financing these schemes, creating inequality of access. A National consultation bringing together the Ministry of Health, regional health agencies, the CNSA and these different stakeholders could make it possible to harmonize financing and access arrangements. Finally, the MP insists on the need to promote universal respite measures, inspired for example by the model of thermal cures, financed by health insurance. These devices would not only contribute to preserving health caregivers, but also to reduce expenses linked to avoidable pathologies, such as burn-out or depression. In this context, he wishes to know if it intends to harmonize the financing of respite stays, in particular by integrating supplementary pension funds (Agirc-Arrco) and those of the public service in a common strategy for equitable national financing. He also asks him what tools are envisaged to strengthen coordination between institutional actors and simplify procedures for caregivers. Finally, he would like to know what avenues of reflection it is developing to guarantee equal access to respite throughout the territory, in line with the objectives of the multi-annual national strategy 2023-2027.
Question· Question écrite3992answered
France · National Assembly · 11 February 2025
Mr. Laurent Mazaury draws the attention of the Minister Delegate to the Minister of Labor, Health, Solidarity and Families, responsible for autonomy and disability, to the subject of twenty years of the law of February 11, 2005 for equal rights and opportunities, participation and citizenship of disabled people. If it is one of the great laws of the Republic, its anniversary highlights that it did not have all the expected effects. Indeed, the expectations of the 12 million people with disabilities and their loved ones remain high. In 2025, people with disabilities still cannot live with dignity in the city and act as full citizens. This situation persists despite the new commitments made by France since: the ratification of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in 2010 and the creation of the fifth branch of social security dedicated to supporting autonomy in 2020. On the one hand, French law and public action have still not been fully consistent with international law, despite repeated condemnations from international authorities. On the other hand, the autonomy branch remains insufficiently resourced and without a coherent multi-annual political vision, preventing a real response to the needs on the ground. The report drawn up by the disability collective, bringing together 54 associations defending the rights of people with disabilities and their families, is clear: the urgency must be to make the fundamental rights of disabled people effective, throughout the territory, starting with the two pillars of the law, universal accessibility and the right to compensation. Indeed, twenty years after the promulgation of the law, universal accessibility (built environment, transport, communication, digital, etc.) is still not a reality. Access to effective and personalized compensation for the consequences of disability on daily life is an obstacle course, largely hampering people's life plans. The standard of living of people with disabilities and their loved ones is lower than the general population: one in four people with disabilities is poor. The rights to education, employment, housing and even health continue to be violated simply because of the disability situation. In short, the stigmatization and invisibility of people with disabilities and their caregivers, the precariousness they have to face, the lack of support and care professionals and the general inaccessibility are all obstacles, injustices and inequalities which are no longer acceptable in 2025. This is why he wants to know what measures the Government intends to take to translate the promises of the law of February 11, 2005 into action and finally make the rights of people with disabilities effective.