Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Defence

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

201 records in EU in 2022

All countriesUnited States · 41,749Ireland · 23,760United Kingdom · 15,991Germany · 5,712France · 4,098Netherlands · 3,840Austria · 3,566European Union · 2,430Belgium · 5Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0335decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Gamal Mohamed Hosni Elsayed Mubarak and Others v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Egypt – Measures directed against persons responsible for misappropriation of State funds and associated persons and entities – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds – Maintenance of the applicants’ names on the list – Rights of the defence – Obligation on the Council of the European Union to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment.#Cases T-335/18, T-338/18 and T-327/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0634decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#FC v European Union Agency for Asylum.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Pre-disciplinary proceedings – Suspension, withholding of remuneration and prohibition on access to EUAA’s premises and facilities – OLAF Report – Principle of sound administration – Right to be heard – Principle of impartiality – Manifest error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Liability – Close link with the claim for annulment.#Case T-634/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0335_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Gamal Mohamed Hosni Elsayed Mubarak and Others v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Egypt – Measures directed against persons responsible for misappropriation of State funds and associated persons and entities – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds – Maintenance of the applicants’ names on the list – Rights of the defence – Obligation on the Council of the European Union to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment.#Cases T-335/18, T-338/18 and T-327/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0634_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#FC v European Union Agency for Asylum.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Pre-disciplinary proceedings – Suspension, withholding of remuneration and prohibition on access to EUAA’s premises and facilities – OLAF Report – Principle of sound administration – Right to be heard – Principle of impartiality – Manifest error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Liability – Close link with the claim for annulment.#Case T-634/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0340_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 30 March 2022.#Japan Airlines Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) – Exchange of information – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Article 266 TFEU – Limitation period – Rights of the defence – Non-discrimination – Single and continuous infringement – Amount of the fine – Value of sales – Gravity of the infringement – Additional amount – Mitigating circumstances – Encouragement of the anticompetitive conduct by public authorities – Substantially limited involvement – Proportionality – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-340/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0324_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 30 March 2022.#SAS Cargo Group A/S and Others v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) – Exchange of information – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Rights of the defence – Equality of arms – Article 266 TFEU – State coercion – Single and continuous infringement – Amount of the fine – Value of sales – Gravity of the infringement – Duration of participation in the infringement – Mitigating circumstances – Substantially limited involvement – Aggravating circumstances – Repeated infringement – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-324/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0334_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 30 March 2022.#Cargolux Airlines International SA v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) – Exchange of information – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Rights of the defence – Failure to send a new statement of objections – Single and continuous infringement – Amount of the fine – Value of sales – Gravity of the infringement – Duration of participation in the infringement – Additional amount – Mitigating circumstances – Encouragement of the anticompetitive conduct by public authorities – Follow‑my‑leader role – Proportionality – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-334/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0326_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 30 March 2022.#Air Canada v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) – Exchange of information – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Rights of the defence – Failure to send a new statement of objections – Single and continuous infringement – Withdrawal of the leniency application – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-326/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0291_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#Viktor Fedorovych Yanukovych v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-291/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0292_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#Oleksandr Viktorovych Yanukovych v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-292/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0291decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#Viktor Fedorovych Yanukovych v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-291/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0326decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 30 March 2022.#Air Canada v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) – Exchange of information – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Rights of the defence – Failure to send a new statement of objections – Single and continuous infringement – Withdrawal of the leniency application – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-326/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0334decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 30 March 2022.#Cargolux Airlines International SA v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) – Exchange of information – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Rights of the defence – Failure to send a new statement of objections – Single and continuous infringement – Amount of the fine – Value of sales – Gravity of the infringement – Duration of participation in the infringement – Additional amount – Mitigating circumstances – Encouragement of the anticompetitive conduct by public authorities – Follow-my-leader role – Proportionality – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-334/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0344decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 30 March 2022.#Latam Airlines Group SA and Lan Cargo SA v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) – Exchange of information – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Limitation period – Ne bis in idem principle – Principle of non-discrimination – Rights of the defence – State constraint – Single and continuous infringement – Amount of the fine – Value of sales – Gravity of the infringement – Mitigating circumstances – Substantially limited participation – Proportionality – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-344/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0340decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 30 March 2022.#Japan Airlines Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) – Exchange of information – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Article 266 TFEU – Limitation period – Rights of the defence – Non-discrimination – Single and continuous infringement – Amount of the fine – Value of sales – Gravity of the infringement – Additional amount – Mitigating circumstances – Encouragement of the anticompetitive conduct by public authorities – Substantially limited involvement – Proportionality – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-340/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0292decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#Oleksandr Viktorovych Yanukovych v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-292/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0343decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 30 March 2022.#Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) – Exchange of information – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Rights of the defence – Limitation period – State constraint – Single and continuous infringement – Amount of the fine – Value of sales – Gravity of the infringement – Mitigating circumstances – Encouragement of anticompetitive behaviour by public authorities – Substantially reduced participation – Proportionality – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-343/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0344_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 30 March 2022.#Latam Airlines Group SA and Lan Cargo SA v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) – Exchange of information – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Limitation period – Ne bis in idem principle – Principle of non-discrimination – Rights of the defence – State constraint – Single and continuous infringement – Amount of the fine – Value of sales – Gravity of the infringement – Mitigating circumstances – Substantially limited participation – Proportionality – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-344/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0343_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 30 March 2022.#Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) – Exchange of information – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Rights of the defence – Limitation period – State constraint – Single and continuous infringement – Amount of the fine – Value of sales – Gravity of the infringement – Mitigating circumstances – Encouragement of anticompetitive behaviour by public authorities – Substantially reduced participation – Proportionality – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-343/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0324decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 30 March 2022.#SAS Cargo Group A/S and Others v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) – Exchange of information – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Rights of the defence – Equality of arms – Article 266 TFEU – State coercion – Single and continuous infringement – Amount of the fine – Value of sales – Gravity of the infringement – Duration of participation in the infringement – Mitigating circumstances – Substantially limited involvement – Aggravating circumstances – Repeated infringement – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-324/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0661_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 23 March 2022 (Extracts).#NV v European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Staff of eu-LISA – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary penalty – Reprimand – Implementing provisions concerning administrative inquiries – Plea of illegality – Article 110 of the Staff Regulations – Failure to consult the Staff Committee – Rights of the defence and right to be heard – Articles 12, 12a, 17 and 19 of the Staff Regulations – Error of assessment – Principle of good administration – Article 10 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Liability – Non-material damage.#Case T-661/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0661decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 23 March 2022 (Extracts).#NV v European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Staff of eu-LISA – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary penalty – Reprimand – Implementing provisions concerning administrative inquiries – Plea of illegality – Article 110 of the Staff Regulations – Failure to consult the Staff Committee – Rights of the defence and right to be heard – Articles 12, 12a, 17 and 19 of the Staff Regulations – Error of assessment – Principle of good administration – Article 10 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Liability – Non-material damage.#Case T-661/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 March 2022

Report· CCCELEX 62020CC0391decided

Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 8 March 2022.#Proceedings brought by Boriss Cilevičs and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Satversmes tiesa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 49 TFEU – Freedom of establishment – Restriction – Justification – The organisation of education systems – Institutions of higher education – Obligation to provide courses of study in the official language of the Member State concerned – Article 4(2) TEU – National identity of a Member State – Defence and promotion of the official language of a Member State – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-391/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0834_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 23 February 2022.#United Parcel Service, Inc. v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Competition – Markets for international express small package delivery services in the EEA – Concentration – Decision declaring the concentration incompatible with the internal market – Annulment of the decision by a judgment of the Court – Rights of the defence – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – Causal link.#Case T-834/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 February 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0834decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 23 February 2022.#United Parcel Service, Inc. v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Competition – Markets for international express small package delivery services in the EEA – Concentration – Decision declaring the concentration incompatible with the internal market – Annulment of the decision by a judgment of the Court – Rights of the defence – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – Causal link.#Case T-834/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 February 2022

Report· XGCELEX 52022XG0301(01)open

Common Military list of the European Union adopted by the Council on 21 February 2022 (equipment covered by Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP defining common rules governing the control of exports of military technology and equipment) (updating and replacing the Common Military List of the European Union adopted by the Council on 17 February 2020 (OJ C 85, 13.3.2020, p. 1.)) (CFSP) 2022/C 100/03

European Union · Council of the European Union · 21 February 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0740_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 February 2022.#Taminco BVBA and Arysta LifeScience Great Britain Ltd v European Commission.#Plant protection products – Active substance thiram – Non-renewal of approval – Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012 – Rights of the defence – Procedural irregularity – Manifest error of assessment – Competence of EFSA – Proportionality – Precautionary principle – Equal treatment.#Case T-740/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 February 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0317_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 February 2022.#AMVAC Netherlands BV v European Commission.#Plant protection products – Active substance ethoprophos – Non-renewal of approval – Regulation No 1107/2009 and Implementing Regulation No 844/2012 – Rights of the defence – Manifest error of assessment – Legal certainty – Proportionality – Precautionary principle.#Case T-317/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 February 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0317decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 February 2022.#AMVAC Netherlands BV v European Commission.#Plant protection products – Active substance ethoprophos – Non-renewal of approval – Regulation No 1107/2009 and Implementing Regulation No 844/2012 – Rights of the defence – Manifest error of assessment – Legal certainty – Proportionality – Precautionary principle.#Case T-317/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 February 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0740decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 February 2022.#Taminco BVBA and Arysta LifeScience Great Britain Ltd v European Commission.#Plant protection products – Active substance thiram – Non-renewal of approval – Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012 – Rights of the defence – Procedural irregularity – Manifest error of assessment – Competence of EFSA – Proportionality – Precautionary principle – Equal treatment.#Case T-740/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 February 2022

PreviousPage 4 of 5Next