Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Defence

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

401 records in EU

All countriesUnited States · 41,749Ireland · 23,760United Kingdom · 15,991Germany · 5,713France · 4,100Netherlands · 3,841Austria · 3,566European Union · 2,430Belgium · 5Search this topic

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0600_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 26 September 2024.#CPC and ACO v European Parliament.#Appeal – Law governing the institutions – Members of the European Parliament – Official communication, by the Member States, of the names of elected Members – Powers of the Parliament – Request for defence of immunity – Acts in respect of which an action for annulment cannot be brought.#Case C-600/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 September 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0600decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 26 September 2024.#Carles Puigdemont i Casamajó and Antoni Comín i Oliveres v European Parliament.#Appeal – Law governing the institutions – Members of the European Parliament – Official communication, by the Member States, of the names of elected Members – Powers of the Parliament – Request for defence of immunity – Acts in respect of which an action for annulment cannot be brought.#Case C-600/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0607_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 18 September 2024.#Andrey Anatolyevich Kozitsyn v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on such a list – Concept of ‘leading businesspersons’ – Concept of ‘businessperson involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Plea of illegality – Rights of the defence – Right to effective judicial protection – Error of assessment – Right to property – Freedom to conduct a business.#Joined Cases T-607/22 and T-731/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0617_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 18 September 2024.#Safran Aircraft Engines v European Commission.#Award of grants in the field of defence – EDF – Funding of development actions – Call for proposals ‘EDF 2021-ENERENV-D-PES: Alternative propulsion and energy systems for next generation air combat systems’ – Rejection of the applicant’s proposal – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of sound administration – Equal treatment – Legal certainty – Transparency – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-617/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0671_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 18 September 2024.#Qualcomm, Inc. v European Commission.#Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Market for UMTS baseband chipsets – Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement – Predatory pricing – Competence of the author of the act – Rights of the defence – Definition of the relevant market – Dominant position – Abuse – Reconstruction of prices – Determining the cost benchmark – Price-cost test – No requirement to demonstrate the existence of actual effects – Intention to eliminate a competitor – Objective justification – Calculation of the fine – 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines – Value of sales – Additional amount – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-671/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0671decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 18 September 2024.#Qualcomm, Inc. v European Commission.#Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Market for UMTS baseband chipsets – Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement – Predatory pricing – Competence of the author of the act – Rights of the defence – Definition of the relevant market – Dominant position – Abuse – Reconstruction of prices – Determining the cost benchmark – Price-cost test – No requirement to demonstrate the existence of actual effects – Intention to eliminate a competitor – Objective justification – Calculation of the fine – 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines – Value of sales – Additional amount – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-671/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0607decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 18 September 2024.#Andrey Anatolyevich Kozitsyn v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on such a list – Concept of ‘leading businesspersons’ – Concept of ‘businessperson involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Plea of illegality – Rights of the defence – Right to effective judicial protection – Error of assessment – Right to property – Freedom to conduct a business.#Joined Cases T-607/22 and T-731/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0617decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 18 September 2024.#Safran Aircraft Engines v European Commission.#Award of grants in the field of defence – EDF – Funding of development actions – Call for proposals ‘EDF‑2021-ENERENV-D-PES: Alternative propulsion and energy systems for next generation air combat systems’ – Rejection of the applicant’s proposal – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of sound administration – Equal treatment – Legal certainty – Transparency – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-617/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0032_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#Vyatsky Plywood Mill OOO v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of birch plywood originating in Russia – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1930 – Objective examination – Post-investigation period – Market segmentation – Other injury factors – Article 3(2), (6) and (7) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Equal treatment – Union interest – Article 21 of Regulation 2016/1036 – Rights of the defence.#Case T-32/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0286_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#OT v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintaining the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘leading businessperson’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Plea of illegality – Error of assessment – Rights of the defence – Right to effective judicial protection – Right to an effective remedy.#Case T-286/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0286decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#OT v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintaining the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘leading businessperson’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Plea of illegality – Error of assessment – Rights of the defence – Right to effective judicial protection – Right to an effective remedy.#Case T-286/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0032decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#Vyatsky Plywood Mill OOO v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of birch plywood originating in Russia – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1930 – Objective examination – Post-investigation period – Market segmentation – Other injury factors – Article 3(2), (6) and (7) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Equal treatment – Union interest – Article 21 of Regulation 2016/1036 – Rights of the defence.#Case T-32/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 September 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0351decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 10 September 2024.#Neves 77 Solutions SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală – Direcţia Generală Antifraudă Fiscală.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the actions of the Russian Federation destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Decision 2014/512/CFSP – Article 2(2)(a) – Jurisdiction of the Court – Final sentence of the second subparagraph of Article 24(1) TEU – Article 275 TFEU – Article 215 TFEU – Article 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to property – Principle of legal certainty and principle that penalties must be defined by law – Brokering services in relation to military equipment – Prohibition on providing such services – Failure to notify the competent national authorities – Administrative offence – Fine – Automatic confiscation of the amounts received in consideration for the prohibited transaction.#Case C-351/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0351_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 10 September 2024.#Neves 77 Solutions SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală – Direcţia Generală Antifraudă Fiscală.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the actions of the Russian Federation destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Decision 2014/512/CFSP – Article 2(2)(a) – Jurisdiction of the Court – Final sentence of the second subparagraph of Article 24(1) TEU – Article 275 TFEU – Article 215 TFEU – Article 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to property – Principle of legal certainty and principle that penalties must be defined by law – Brokering services in relation to military equipment – Prohibition on providing such services – Failure to notify the competent national authorities – Administrative offence – Fine – Automatic confiscation of the amounts received in consideration for the prohibited transaction.#Case C-351/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2024

Report· CCCELEX 62022CC0339(01)decided

Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 5 September 2024.#BSH Hausgeräte GmbH v Electrolux AB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea hovrätt, Patent- och marknadsöverdomstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 4(1) – General jurisdiction – Article 24(4) – Exclusive jurisdiction – Jurisdiction in proceedings concerned with the registration or validity of patents – Infringement action – European patent validated in Member States and in a third State – Challenge to the validity of the patent raised as a defence – International jurisdiction of the court hearing the infringement action.#Case C-339/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 September 2024

Report· CCCELEX 62023CC0510decided

Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 5 September 2024.#Trenitalia SpA v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per il Lazio.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market – Directive 2005/29/EC – Measures intended to combat such practices – Articles 11 and 13 – Procedures for infringement of the rules of consumer law – Compliance with a reasonable time limit – National legislation requiring the national authority to issue a statement of objections within a time limit of 90 days of knowledge of the essential elements of the infringement – Automatic annulment in its entirety of the decision of the national authority in the event of failure to comply with that time limit – Principle ne bis in idem – Revocation of the power to initiate new infringement proceedings in respect of the same facts – Principle of effectiveness – Rights of defence of undertakings.#Case C-510/23.#Caronte & Tourist SpA v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per il Lazio.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of dominant position – Empowering national competition authorities to enforce the rules on competition – Directive (EU) 2019/1 – Independence of national competition authorities – Article 4(5) – Setting priorities for the proceedings for the enforcement of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU – Fines on undertakings and associations of undertakings – Article 13 – Procedures for infringement of the rules of competition law – Compliance with a reasonable time limit – National legislation requiring the national authority to issue a statement of objections within a time limit of 90 days of knowledge of the essential elements of the infringement – Automatic annulment in its entirety of the decision of the national competition authority in the event of failure to comply with that time limit – Principle ne bis in idem – Revocation of the power to initiate new infringement proceedings in respect of the same facts – Principle of effectiveness – Rights of defence of undertakings.#Case C-511/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0208decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 July 2024.#Kinda Makhlouf v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Restriction on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources or subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Heir of a person already subject to restrictive measures – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Freedom to move and reside in the Member States – Right to family life – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-208/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 July 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0207_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 July 2024.#Ghada Mhana v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Restriction on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds or the restriction on entry into the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Heir of a person already subject to restrictive measures – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-207/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 July 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0206_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 July 2024.#Sara Makhlouf v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Restriction on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds or the restriction on entry into the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Heir of a person already subject to restrictive measures – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-206/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 July 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0207decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 July 2024.#Ghada Mhana v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Restriction on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds or the restriction on entry into the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Heir of a person already subject to restrictive measures – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-207/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 July 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0206decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 July 2024.#Sara Makhlouf v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Restriction on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds or the restriction on entry into the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Heir of a person already subject to restrictive measures – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-206/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 July 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0209decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 July 2024.#Shahla Makhlouf v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Restriction on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources or subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Heir of a person already subject to restrictive measures – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-209/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 July 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ1077decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 July 2024.#Bytedance Ltd v European Commission.#Digital services – Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 – Designation of gatekeepers – Online social networking service – Article 3(1), (2) and (5) of Regulation 2022/1925 – Requirements – Presumptions – Rebuttal of the presumptions – Rights of the defence – Equal treatment.#Case T-1077/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 July 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ1077_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 July 2024.#Bytedance Ltd v European Commission.#Digital services – Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 – Designation of gatekeepers – Online social networking service – Article 3(1), (2) and (5) of Regulation 2022/1925 – Requirements – Presumptions – Rebuttal of the presumptions – Rights of the defence – Equal treatment.#Case T-1077/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 July 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0208_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 July 2024.#Kinda Makhlouf v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Restriction on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources or subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Heir of a person already subject to restrictive measures – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Freedom to move and reside in the Member States – Right to family life – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-208/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 July 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0209_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 July 2024.#Shahla Makhlouf v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Restriction on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources or subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Heir of a person already subject to restrictive measures – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-209/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 July 2024

Report· XGCELEX 52024XG04546open

Notice for the attention of the persons, entities and bodies to whom measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/1532, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/1970 and in Council Regulation (EU) 2023/1529, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1971 concerning restrictive measures in view of Iran’s military support of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and to armed groups and entities in the Middle East and the Red Sea region apply

European Union · Council of the European Union · 16 July 2024

Report· XGCELEX 52024XG04548open

Notice for the attention of the persons, entities and bodies to whom measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/1532, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/1970 and in Council Regulation (EU) 2023/1529, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1971 concerning restrictive measures in view of Iran’s military support of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and to armed groups and entities in the Middle East and the Red Sea region apply

European Union · Council of the European Union · 16 July 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0123_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 July 2024.#Ecocert India Pte Ltd v European Commission.#Agriculture – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2325 – Imports into the European Union of organic products from third countries – Recognition of third countries – Execution of controls and certification of products by control bodies – Decision to withdraw an establishment from the list of recognised control bodies for India appearing in the list of recognised third countries – Competence of the Commission – Rights of the defence – Proportionality – Equal treatment – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations.#Case T-123/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 July 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0123decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 July 2024.#Ecocert India Pte Ltd v European Commission.#Agriculture – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2325 – Imports into the European Union of organic products from third countries – Recognition of third countries – Execution of controls and certification of products by control bodies – Decision to withdraw an establishment from the list of recognised control bodies for India appearing in the list of recognised third countries – Competence of the Commission – Rights of the defence – Proportionality – Equal treatment – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations.#Case T-123/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 July 2024

PreviousPage 8 of 9Next