Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

701 records in EU in 2019

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773France · 6,057Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778Germany · 295Austria · 218United States · 141Belgium · 1Estonia · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0001decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 June 2019.#SIA 'Oribalt Rīga v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 – Article 30(2)(b) and (c) – Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 – Article 152(1)(a) and (b) – Determination of the customs value of the goods – Definition of ‘similar goods’ – Medicinal products – Account taken of any factor that may have an impact on the economic value of the medicinal product concerned – Time limit of 90 days within which the imported goods must be sold in the European Union – Mandatory time limit – No account taken of trade discounts.#Case C-1/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 June 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0390decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 June 2019.#Klaus Nonnemacher v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark WKU WORLD KICKBOXING AND KARATE UNION — Earlier EU word marks WKA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No limitation in consequence of acquiescence — Article 61(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-390/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 June 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0389decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 June 2019.#Klaus Nonnemacher v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark WKU — Earlier EU word marks WKA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No limitation in consequence of acquiescence — Article 61(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-389/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 June 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0181decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 19 June 2019.#L'Oréal v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark MASTER PRECISE — Earlier national figurative mark MASTERS COLORS PARIS — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8 (1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 2 07/2009 (now Article 8 (1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-181/16 RENV.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 June 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0179decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 19 June 2019.#L'Oréal v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark MASTER SMOKY — Earlier national figurative mark MASTERS COLORS PARIS — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-179/16 RENV.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 June 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0028decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 June 2019.#Marriott Worldwide Corp. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark AC MILAN — Earlier EU word marks AC and AC HOTELS BY MARRIOTT and earlier EU figurative mark AC HOTELS MARRIOTT — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity between the signs — Lack of enhanced distinctiveness of the mark AC — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-28/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 June 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0180decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 19 June 2019.#L'Oréal v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark MASTER SHAPE — Earlier national figurative mark MASTERS COLORS PARIS — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8 (1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 2 07/2009 (now Article 8 (1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-180/16 RENV.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 June 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0307_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 19 June 2019.#adidas AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark representing three parallel stripes — Absolute ground for invalidity — No distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) and Article 52(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(3) and Article 59(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Form of use unable to be taken into account — Form that differs from the form under which the mark has been registered by significant variations — Inversion of the colour scheme.#Case T-307/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 June 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0307decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 19 June 2019.#adidas AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark representing three parallel stripes — Absolute ground for invalidity — No distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) and Article 52(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(3) and Article 59(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Form of use unable to be taken into account — Form that differs from the form under which the mark has been registered by significant variations — Inversion of the colour scheme.#Case T-307/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 June 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0182decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 19 June 2019.#L'Oréal v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark MASTER DUO — Earlier national figurative mark MASTERS COLORS PARIS — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-182/16 RENV.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 June 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0183decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 19 June 2019.#L'Oréal v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark MASTER DRAMA — Earlier national figurative mark MASTERS COLORS PARIS — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-183/16 RENV.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 June 2019

Decision· DCELEX 32019D1029in force

Council Decision (EU) 2019/1029 of 18 June 2019 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the relevant Committees of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe as regards the proposals for modifications to UN Regulations Nos 14, 17, 24, 30, 44, 51, 64, 75, 78, 79, 83, 85, 90, 115, 117, 129, 138, 139, 140 and 145, as regards the proposals for modifications to Global Technical Regulations (GTRs) Nos 15 and 19, as regards the proposal for an amendment to Mutual Resolution M.R.2, as regards the proposal for one new UN Regulation, and as regards the proposals for amendments to the authorisations to develop GTRs

European Union · EUR-Lex · 18 June 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0569decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 18 June 2019.#W. Kordes' Söhne Rosenschulen GmbH & Co KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark Kordes’ Rose Monique — Absolute ground for refusal — Mark consisting of a plant variety denomination — Essential elements — Article 7(1)(m) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(m) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-569/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 June 2019

Decision· DCELEX 32019D1707in force

Council Decision (EU) 2019/1707 of 17 June 2019 on the position to be taken, on behalf of the European Union, in the Trade Committee established under the Interim Partnership Agreement between the European Community, of the one part, and the Pacific States, of the other part, as regards a recommendation for certain amendments to be made to the Agreement to take account of the accession of Samoa and of future accessions of other Pacific Island States

European Union · EUR-Lex · 17 June 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0366decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 June 2019.#Pet King Brands, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark SUIMOX — Earlier EU word mark ZYMOX — Obligation to state reasons — Notification of a decision of the Board of Appeal — Good faith and diligence on the part of the addressee — Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-366/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 June 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0398decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 June 2019.#Radoslaw Pielczyk v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark DERMÆPIL sugar epil system — Earlier national figurative mark dermépil — Relative ground for refusal — Genuine use of the mark — Article 57(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 64 (2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Likelihood of confusion — Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001) read in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) of that regulation (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Comparison of the goods.#Case T-398/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 June 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0357decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 June 2019.#Luz Saúde, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for registration of EU figurative mark HOSPITAL DA LUZ — Earlier national figurative mark clínica LALUZ — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-357/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 June 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0074_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 June 2019.#Visi/one GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a display holder for vehicles – Earlier design – Proof of disclosure – Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Ground for invalidity – Lack of individual character – Informed user – Degree of freedom of the designer – Lack of different overall impression – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-74/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 June 2019

Record· COCELEX 62018CO0805decided

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 June 2019.#Saga Furs Oyj v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for registration of the word sign SAGA — Application lodged with the General Court of the European Union signed by a ‘licensed legal counsel’ — Manifest inadmissibility — Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union — No representation by a lawyer — Appeal manifestly unfounded).#Case C-805/18 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 June 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0583decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 June 2019.#EOS Deutscher Inkasso-Dienst GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark IOS FINANCE — Earlier national figurative mark EOS — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-583/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 June 2019

Proposal· PCCELEX 52019PC0268open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, and provisional application of the Agreement in the form of an exchange of letters between the European Union and Ukraine amending the trade preferences for poultry meat and poultry meat preparations provided for by the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part

European Union · European Commission · 12 June 2019

Record· TOCELEX 62018TO0538decided

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 June 2019.#Sigrid Dickmanns v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Civil service — Temporary staff — Fixed-term contract with a termination clause — Clause terminating the contract in the event that the name of the agent is not included on the reserve list of a competition — Purely confirmatory measure — Period within which an action must be brought — Inadmissibility.#Case T-538/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 June 2019

Decision· DCELEX 32019D1172in force

Council Decision (EU) 2019/1172 of 6 June 2019 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, and provisional application of certain provisions of the Agreement between the European Union and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the application of certain provisions of Council Decision 2008/615/JHA on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime, of Council Decision 2008/616/JHA on the implementation of Decision 2008/615/JHA on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime, and the Annex thereto, and of Council Framework Decision 2009/905/JHA on accreditation of forensic service providers carrying out laboratory activities

European Union · EUR-Lex · 6 June 2019

PreviousPage 14 of 15Next