Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

801 records in EU in 2022

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778France · 494Germany · 293Austria · 164United States · 141Belgium · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0640decided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 June 2022.#bet-at-home.com Entertainment GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for registration of the EU figurative mark bet-at-home – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-640/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 June 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0357_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 29 June 2022.#Jose A. Alfonso Arpon SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark PLUMAflex by Roal – Earlier EU figurative mark PUMA – Relative ground for refusal – Damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-357/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 June 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0337_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 June 2022.#Hochmann Marketing GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Board of Appeal decision confirming the revocation of an earlier decision – Article 103(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Request for conversion into a national trade mark application – Ground precluding conversion – Non-use of the EU trade mark – Article 139(2)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Right to be heard – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-337/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 June 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0337decided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 June 2022.#Hochmann Marketing GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Board of Appeal decision confirming the revocation of an earlier decision – Article 103(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Request for conversion into a national trade mark application – Ground precluding conversion – Non-use of the EU trade mark – Article 139(2)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Right to be heard – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-337/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 June 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0306decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 29 June 2022.#Hijos de Moisés Rodríguez González, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark La Irlandesa 1943 – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Declaration of invalidity by the Grand Board of Appeal of EUIPO – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Court – Relevant date for the examination of an absolute ground for invalidity – Mark of such a nature as to deceive the public – Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-306/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 June 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0609decided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 June 2022 (Extracts).#LA International Cooperation Srl v European Commission.#Pre-Accession Assistance Instrument – OLAF investigation – Commission decision imposing an administrative sanction – Exclusion from procurement and grant award procedures covered by the general budget of the European Union for a period of four years – Registration in the early detection and exclusion system database – Financial regulation – Unlimited jurisdiction – Proportionality of the sanction.#Case T-609/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 June 2022

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0728_SUMdecided

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 June 2022.#OF v Instituto de Financiamento da Agricultura e Pescas IP (IFAP).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – Irregularities with regard to EU law – Proceedings – Limitation period – Interruption – Act relating to investigation or legal proceedings concerning an irregularity – Concept – Control report identifying the existence of an irregularity.#Case C-728/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 June 2022

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0728decided

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 June 2022.#OF v Instituto de Financiamento da Agricultura e Pescas IP (IFAP).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – Irregularities with regard to EU law – Proceedings – Limitation period – Interruption – Act relating to investigation or legal proceedings concerning an irregularity – Concept – Control report identifying the existence of an irregularity.#Case C-728/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 June 2022

Report· AGCELEX 52022AG0002(01)open

Position (EU) No 2/2022 of the Council at First Reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 as regards the use of the regulatory procedure with scrutiny in order to adapt it to Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union Adopted by the Council on 28 June 2022 (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 280/02

European Union · Council of the European Union · 28 June 2022

Record· TOCELEX 62022TO0237decided

Order of the President of the General Court of 27 June 2022.#Alisher Usmanov v Council of the European Union.#Interim relief – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of Russian actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Application for interim measures – Lack of urgency – Balancing of interests.#Case T-237/22 R.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 June 2022

Record· TOCELEX 62022TO0237_INFdecided

Order of the President of the General Court of 27 June 2022.#Alisher Usmanov v Council of the European Union.#Interim relief – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of Russian actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Application for interim measures – Lack of urgency – Balancing of interests.#Case T-237/22 R.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 June 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0502_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 June 2022.#Munich, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark MUNICH10A.T.M. – Earlier EU and national figurative marks MUNICH – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity of the goods and services – No aesthetic complementarity – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001) – No damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Rights of the defence.#Case T-502/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 June 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0739decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 22 June 2022.#Unite the Union v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark WATERFORD – Action for annulment – Article 63(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Admissibility – Trade mark liable to mislead the public – Article 51(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-739/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 June 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0329_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 22 June 2022.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark FRAAS – Genuine use of a mark – Use in connection with the goods in respect of which the mark was registered – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Proof of genuine use.#Case T-329/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 June 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0602decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 22 June 2022.#Kubara sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark good calories – Absolute grounds for refusal – No distinctive character – Descriptiveness – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations.#Case T-602/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 June 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0628_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 June 2022.#Tequila Revolución S.A.P.I. De C.V. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Revolution Vodka – Earlier EU word mark TEQUILA REVOLUCIÓN – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 8(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Absence of genuine use – Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-628/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 June 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0628decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 June 2022.#Tequila Revolución S.A.P.I. De C.V. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Revolution Vodka – Earlier EU word mark TEQUILA REVOLUCIÓN – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 8(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Absence of genuine use – Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-628/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 June 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0329decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 22 June 2022.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark FRAAS – Genuine use of a mark – Use in connection with the goods in respect of which the mark was registered – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Proof of genuine use.#Case T-329/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 June 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0502decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 June 2022.#Munich, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark MUNICH10A.T.M. – Earlier EU and national figurative marks MUNICH – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity of the goods and services – No aesthetic complementarity – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001) – No damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Rights of the defence.#Case T-502/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 June 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0739_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 22 June 2022.#Unite the Union v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark WATERFORD – Action for annulment – Article 63(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Admissibility – Trade mark liable to mislead the public – Article 51(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-739/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 June 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0356decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 22 June 2022.#Future Motion, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark HYPERCORE – Earlier EU figurative mark HIPERCOR – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-356/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 June 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0029_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 June 2022.#Beveland, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark BUCANERO – Genuine use of the trade mark – Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (a) and Article 58(1) point (a) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character of the mark – Proof of genuine use.#Case T-29/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 June 2022

Report· CCCELEX 62021CC0259decided

Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 22 June 2022.#European Parliament v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Common fisheries policy – Regulation (EU) 2021/92 – Fixing for 2021 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, for Union fishing vessels, in certain non-Union waters – Conservation of fishery resources and protection of marine ecosystems through technical measures – Articles 15 to 17 and 20 and the second paragraph of Article 59 – Article 43(3) TFEU – Misuse of powers – Principle of sincere cooperation.#Case C-259/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 June 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0029decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 June 2022.#Beveland, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark BUCANERO – Genuine use of the trade mark – Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (a) and Article 58(1) point (a) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character of the mark – Proof of genuine use.#Case T-29/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 June 2022

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0153decided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 22 June 2022.#Legero Schuhfabrik GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-153/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 June 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0356_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 22 June 2022.#Future Motion, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark HYPERCORE – Earlier EU figurative mark HIPERCOR – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-356/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 June 2022

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0154decided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 22 June 2022.#Legero Schuhfabrik GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-154/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 June 2022

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0152decided

Order of the Court (Court determining whether appeals may proceed) of 22 June 2022.#Legero Schuhfabrik GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-152/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 June 2022

Record· TOCELEX 62022TO0234_INFdecided

Order of the President of the General Court of 21 June 2022.#Gulbakhor Ismailova v Council of the European Union.#Interim relief – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in respect of Russia’s actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Application for interim measures – No urgency – Balancing of interests.#Case T-234/22 R.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 June 2022

Report· CCCELEX 62020CC0704decided

Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 21 June 2022.#Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid v C and B and X v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State and Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats 's-Hertogenbosch.#References for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Detention of third-country nationals – Fundamental right to liberty – Article 6 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Conditions governing the lawfulness of detention – Directive 2008/115/EC – Article 15 – Directive 2013/33/EU – Article 9 – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Article 28 – Review of the lawfulness of detention and of the continuation of a detention measure – Ex officio review – Fundamental right to an effective judicial remedy – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Joined Cases C-704/20 and C-39/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 June 2022

Record· TOCELEX 62022TO0234decided

Order of the President of the General Court of 21 June 2022.#Gulbakhor Ismailova v Council of the European Union.#Interim relief – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in respect of Russia’s actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Application for interim measures – No urgency – Balancing of interests.#Case T-234/22 R.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 June 2022

Record· TOCELEX 62022TO0238_INFdecided

Order of the President of the General Court of 21 June 2022.#Saodat Narzieva v Council of the European Union.#Interim relief – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in respect of Russia’s actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Application for interim measures – No urgency – Balancing of interests.#Case T-238/22 R.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 June 2022

Record· TOCELEX 62022TO0238decided

Order of the President of the General Court of 21 June 2022.#Saodat Narzieva v Council of the European Union.#Interim relief – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in respect of Russia’s actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Application for interim measures – No urgency – Balancing of interests.#Case T-238/22 R.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 June 2022

PreviousPage 16 of 17Next