Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

1,001 records in EU in 2019

Records

Record· COCELEX 62018CO0733decided

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 March 2019.#Sevenfriday AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — EU trade mark — Application for registration of the word mark SEVENFRIDAY — Opposition proceedings — Rejection of the application for registration — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 8(1)(b) — Appeal manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-733/18 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 March 2019

Decision· DCELEX 32019D1934in force

Council Decision (EU) 2019/1934 of 18 March 2019 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union and its Member States, of the Protocol to the Cooperation Agreement on a Civil Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Korea, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria, the Republic of Croatia and Romania to the European Union

European Union · EUR-Lex · 18 March 2019

Record· COCELEX 62018CO0700decided

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 March 2019.#Hungary Restaurant Company Kft. and Evolution Gaming Advisory Kft. v European Commission.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Action for annulment — Article 263, sixth paragraph, TFEU — Starting point of the period prescribed for instituting proceedings — Action brought more than two months after the date of publication of the act concerned in the Official Journal of the European Union — Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-700/18 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 March 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0038decided

Opinion of Advocate General Bot delivered on 14 March 2019.#Criminal procedure against Massimo Gambino and Shpetim Hyka.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Bari.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive 2012/29/EU — Minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime — Articles 16 and 18 — Examination of the victim by a criminal court of first instance — Alteration of the composition of the panel of judges — Fresh examination of the victim at the request of one of the parties to the proceedings — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Articles 47 and 48 — Right to a fair trial and rights of the defence — Principle of immediacy — Scope — Victim’s right to protection during criminal proceedings.#Case C-38/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 March 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0128decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 March 2019.#Republic of Poland v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment — Directive (EU) 2016/2284 — Reduction of national emissions of certain atmospheric pollutants — Adoption of EU legal acts — Course of the legislative procedure — Article 4(3) TEU — Principle of sincere cooperation — Actual exercise of the EU legislature’s discretion — Impact assessment — Sufficient assessment of the effects of the contested measure — Article 5(4) TEU — Principle of proportionality — Article 4(2) TEU — Equality of Member States before the Treaties — Article 191(2) TFEU — Environmental policy of the European Union — Consideration of the diversity of the regions of the European Union — Judicial review.#Case C-128/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 March 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0730decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 March 2019.#Espírito Santo Financial Group SA v European Central Bank.#Access to documents — Decision 2004/258/EC — Documents relating to the ECB’s decision of 1 August 2014 concerning Banco Espírito Santo SA — Partial refusal to grant access — Exception relating to the confidentiality of the proceedings of the ECB’s decision-making bodies — Exception relating to the financial, monetary or economic policy of the European Union or of a Member State — Exception relating to the stability of the financial system in the European Union or in a Member State — Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests — Exception relating to documents intended for internal use — Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-730/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 March 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0297decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 13 March 2019.#Wirecard Technologies GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark supr — Earlier Benelux word mark Zupr — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 60(1)(a) and Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-297/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 March 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0799decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 12 March 2019.#Xiaomi Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark MI — Earlier EU figurative mark MI — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-799/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 March 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0221_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 12 March 2019.#M.G. Tjebbes and Others v Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Citizenship of the European Union — Article 20 TFEU — Articles 7 and 24 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Nationalities of a Member State and of a third country — Loss of the nationality of a Member State and of citizenship of the Union by operation of law — Consequences — Proportionality.#Case C-221/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 March 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0221decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 12 March 2019.#M.G. Tjebbes and Others v Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Citizenship of the European Union — Article 20 TFEU — Articles 7 and 24 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Nationalities of a Member State and of a third country — Loss of the nationality of a Member State and of citizenship of the Union by operation of law — Consequences — Proportionality.#Case C-221/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 March 2019

Record· TOCELEX 62018TO0326decided

Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 March 2019.#José-Ramón Herrero Torres v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark CARAJILLO LICOR 43 CUARENTA Y TRES — Earlier national figurative mark Carajillo — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-326/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 March 2019

Decision· DCELEX 32019D0399in force

Council Decision (EU) 2019/399 of 7 March 2019 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the relevant Committees of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe as regards the proposals for modifications to UN Regulations Nos 0, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, 10, 19, 23, 27, 38, 41, 48, 50, 51, 53, 55, 58, 62, 67, 69, 70, 73, 74, 77, 86, 87, 91, 92, 98, 104, 106, 107, 110, 112, 113, 116, 119, 122, 123 and 128, the proposal for an amendment to the Consolidated Resolution R.E.5, the proposals for four new UN Regulations, and the proposal for an amendment to Schedule 4 of the Revised 1958 Agreement

European Union · EUR-Lex · 7 March 2019

Decision· DCELEX 32019D0394in force

Council Decision (EU) 2019/394 of 7 March 2019 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of the Protocol between the European Union, Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway to the Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Iceland or Norway regarding access to Eurodac for law enforcement purposes

European Union · EUR-Lex · 7 March 2019

Decision· DCELEX 32019D0393in force

Council Decision (EU) 2019/393 of 7 March 2019 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of the Protocol between the European Union, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland regarding access to Eurodac for law enforcement purposes

European Union · EUR-Lex · 7 March 2019

Decision· DCELEX 32019D0395in force

Council Decision (EU) 2019/395 of 7 March 2019 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of the Protocol to the Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Denmark on the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in Denmark or any other Member State of the European Union and ‘Eurodac’ for the comparison of fingerprints for the effective application of the Dublin Convention regarding access to Eurodac for law enforcement purposes

European Union · EUR-Lex · 7 March 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62015TJ0289_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 6 March 2019.#Hamas v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism — Freezing of funds — Whether an authority of a third State can be classified as a competent authority within the meaning of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP — Factual basis of the decisions to freeze funds — Obligation to state reasons — Error of assessment — Right to property.#Case T-289/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 March 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62015TJ0289decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 6 March 2019.#Hamas v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism — Freezing of funds — Whether an authority of a third State can be classified as a competent authority within the meaning of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP — Factual basis of the decisions to freeze funds — Obligation to state reasons — Error of assessment — Right to property.#Case T-289/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 March 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0321decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 March 2019.#Serenity Pharmaceuticals LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark NOCUVANT — Earlier word marks NOCUTIL — Proof of genuine use — Article 47(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-321/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 March 2019

PreviousPage 20 of 21Next