Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

1,101 records in EU in 2023

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778France · 494Germany · 293Austria · 191United States · 141Belgium · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0052decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 May 2023.#Chambre de commerce et d'industrie territoriale de la Marne en Champagne v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the European Union figurative mark TEHA – Earlier national figurative mark tema – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Lack of genuine use of the mark – Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Use in a form which differs in elements which alter the distinctive character of the trade mark – Article 15(1), second subparagraph, point (a), of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (a), of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-52/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 May 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0106decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 May 2023.#Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark BBQLOUMI – Earlier EU collective word mark HALLOUMI – Relative grounds for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Detriment to reputation – Article 8(1)(b), Article 8(5) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b), Article 8(5) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-106/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 May 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0106_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 May 2023.#Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark BBQLOUMI – Earlier EU collective word mark HALLOUMI – Relative grounds for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Detriment to reputation – Article 8(1)(b), Article 8(5) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b), Article 8(5) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-106/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 May 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0303_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 May 2023.#Dicofarm SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Vitis pharma Dicofarm group – Earlier national figurative mark viti DREN – Relative ground for invalidity – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Weak similarity of the goods and services – No likelihood of confusion.#Case T-303/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 May 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0459_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 May 2023.#Laboratorios Ern, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark BIOLARK – Earlier national word mark BIOPLAK – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-459/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 May 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0168_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 May 2023.#Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark GRILLOUMI – Earlier EU collective word mark HALLOUMI – Relative grounds for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Detriment to reputation – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-168/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 May 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0060_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 May 2023.#Chambre de commerce et d'industrie territoriale de la Marne en Champagne v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark TEHA – Earlier national figurative mark tema – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Lack of genuine use of the mark – Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Use in a form which differs in elements which alter the distinctive character of the trade mark – Article 15(1), second subparagraph, point (a), of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (a), of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-60/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 May 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0052_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 May 2023.#Chambre de commerce et d'industrie territoriale de la Marne en Champagne v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the European Union figurative mark TEHA – Earlier national figurative mark tema – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Lack of genuine use of the mark – Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Use in a form which differs in elements which alter the distinctive character of the trade mark – Article 15(1), second subparagraph, point (a), of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (a), of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-52/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 May 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0192_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 April 2023.#FI v Bayerische Motoren Werke AG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2003/88/EC – Article 7(1) – Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to paid annual leave – Lapse of that right – Progressive retirement scheme – Days of annual leave acquired under that scheme but as yet untaken – Incapacity for work.#Case C-192/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 April 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0192decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 April 2023.#FI v Bayerische Motoren Werke AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2003/88/EC – Article 7(1) – Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to paid annual leave – Lapse of that right – Progressive retirement scheme – Days of annual leave acquired under that scheme but as yet untaken – Incapacity for work.#Case C-192/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 April 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0782decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 April 2023.#Aeris Invest Sàrl v European Central Bank (ECB).#Appeal – Access to documents of the EU institutions – Decision 2004/258/EC – Application for access to certain documents concerning the adoption of a resolution scheme for Banco Popular Español, S.A. – Refusal to grant access – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-782/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 April 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0528_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 27 April 2023.#M.D. v Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság Budapesti és Pest Megyei Regionális Igazgatósága.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Immigration policy – Article 20 TFEU – Genuine enjoyment of the substance of the rights which flow from the status of EU citizenship – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Directive 2008/115/EC – Common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals – Articles 5, 11 and 13 – Direct effect – Right to an effective judicial remedy – Decision banning entry and stay adopted in respect of a third-country national, a family member of a minor EU citizen – Threat to national security – Failure to take into account the individual situation of that third-country national – Refusal to comply with a court decision suspending the effects of that prohibition decision – Consequences.#Case C-528/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 April 2023

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0337(01)_SUMdecided

Order of the President of the Court of 27 April 2023.#European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) v Nowhere Co. Ltd.#Appeal – Intervention – Second paragraph of Article 40 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Interest in the result of the case – EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Rejection of the opposition – Refusal to take into account earlier rights protected in the United Kingdom – Relevant stage of the procedure for assessing the existence of a relative ground for refusal – Association of proprietors of trade marks and professionals in that field with the purpose of promoting trade mark law – Allowed.#Case C-337/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 April 2023

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0337(01)decided

Order of the President of the Court of 27 April 2023.#European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) v Nowhere Co. Ltd.#Appeal – Intervention – Second paragraph of Article 40 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Interest in the result of the case – EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Rejection of the opposition – Refusal to take into account earlier rights protected in the United Kingdom – Relevant stage of the procedure for assessing the existence of a relative ground for refusal – Association of proprietors of trade marks and professionals in that field with the purpose of promoting trade mark law – Allowed.#Case C-337/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 April 2023

Report· CCCELEX 62021CC0655decided

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 27 April 2023.#Criminal proceedings against G. ST. T.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad - Nesebar.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Enforcement of intellectual property rights – Directive 2004/48/EC – Article 13 – Criminal procedure – Scope – Harm suffered by the trade mark proprietor as a constituent element of the offence – Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of International Property Rights (TRIPS) – Article 61 – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 51(1) – Implementation of EU law – Powers – Article 49(1) and (3) – Legality and proportionality of penalties.#Case C-655/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 April 2023

Report· CCCELEX 62021CC0491decided

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 27 April 2023.#WA v Direcţia pentru Evidenţa Persoanelor şi Administrarea Bazelor de Date din Ministerul Afacerilor Interne.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the Union – Article 21(1) TFEU – Right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States – Article 45 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Directive 2004/38/EC – Article 4 – Issuance of an identity card – Requirement of domicile in the Member State issuing the document – Refusal by the authorities of that Member State to issue an identity card to one of its nationals domiciled in another Member State – Equal treatment – Restrictions – Justification.#Case C-491/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 April 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0528decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 27 April 2023.#M.D. v Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság
 Budapesti és Pest Megyei Regionális Igazgatósága
 .#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Immigration policy – Article 20 TFEU – Genuine enjoyment of the substance of the rights which flow from the status of EU citizenship – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Directive 2008/115/EC – Common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals – Articles 5, 11 and 13 – Direct effect – Right to an effective judicial remedy – Decision banning entry and stay adopted in respect of a third-country national, a family member of a minor EU citizen – Threat to national security – Failure to take into account the individual situation of that third-country national – Refusal to comply with a court decision suspending the effects of that prohibition decision – Consequences.#Case C-528/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 April 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0782_INFdecided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 April 2023.#Aeris Invest Sàrl v European Central Bank (ECB).#Appeal – Access to documents of the EU institutions – Decision 2004/258/EC – Application for access to certain documents concerning the adoption of a resolution scheme for Banco Popular Español, S.A. – Refusal to grant access – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-782/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 April 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0147decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 26 April 2023.#Pinar Kuruyemiş Gida Ve Ihtiyaç Maddeleri Sanayi Ticaret AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark pinar KURUYEMIȘ – Earlier German word mark PINAR – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Suspension of proceedings – Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Case T-147/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 April 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0148_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 26 April 2023.#Pinar Kuruyemiş Gida Ve Ihtiyaç Maddeleri Sanayi Ticaret AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark pinar KURUYEMIȘ – Earlier German word mark PINAR – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Suspension of proceedings – Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Case T-148/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 April 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0147_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 26 April 2023.#Pinar Kuruyemiş Gida Ve Ihtiyaç Maddeleri Sanayi Ticaret AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark pinar KURUYEMIȘ – Earlier German word mark PINAR – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Suspension of proceedings – Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Case T-147/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 April 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0148decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 26 April 2023.#Pinar Kuruyemiş Gida Ve Ihtiyaç Maddeleri Sanayi Ticaret AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark pinar KURUYEMIȘ – Earlier German word mark PINAR – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Suspension of proceedings – Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Case T-148/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 April 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0794decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 26 April 2023.#Wenz Kunststoff GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark MOULDPRO – Genuine use of the mark – Nature of use – Use in connection with the goods in respect of which the mark is registered – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Legitimate expectations.#Case T-794/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 April 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0681decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 26 April 2023.#Ana Maria Alves Casas v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark mccosmetics NY – Earlier EU figurative mark MAC MAKE-UP ART COSMETICS – Relative grounds for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-681/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 April 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0547decided

Judgment of the General Court (Single Judge) of 26 April 2023.#Rochem Group AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark R.T.S. Rochem Technical Services – Earlier national figurative mark ROCHEM MARINE – Relative ground for invalidity – Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark – Articles 15 and 57(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Articles 18 and 64(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-547/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 April 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0035decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 26 April 2023.#Arkadiusz Kaminski v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark SYRENA – Application of the law ratione temporis – Partial inadmissibility of the action – Res judicata – Article 15(1) and Article 51(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 18(1) and Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Genuine use in the European Union – Obligation to state reasons – First sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-35/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 April 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0547_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Single Judge) of 26 April 2023.#Rochem Group AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark R.T.S. Rochem Technical Services – Earlier national figurative mark ROCHEM MARINE – Relative ground for invalidity – Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark – Articles 15 and 57(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Articles 18 and 64(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-547/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 April 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0549decided

Judgment of the General Court (Single Judge) of 26 April 2023.#Rochem Group AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark ROCHEM – Earlier national figurative mark ROCHEM MARINE – Relative ground for invalidity – Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark – Articles 15 and 57(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Articles 18 and 64(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-549/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 April 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0035_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 26 April 2023.#Arkadiusz Kaminski v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark SYRENA – Application of the law ratione temporis – Partial inadmissibility of the action – Res judicata – Article 15(1) and Article 51(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 18(1) and Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Genuine use in the European Union – Obligation to state reasons – First sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-35/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 April 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0794_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 26 April 2023.#Wenz Kunststoff GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark MOULDPRO – Genuine use of the mark – Nature of use – Use in connection with the goods in respect of which the mark is registered – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Legitimate expectations.#Case T-794/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 April 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0546_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Single Judge) of 26 April 2023.#Rochem Group AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark R.T.S. ROCHEM Technical Services – Earlier national figurative mark ROCHEM MARINE – Relative ground for invalidity – Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark – Articles 15 and 57(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Articles 18 and 64(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-546/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 April 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0549_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Single Judge) of 26 April 2023.#Rochem Group AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark ROCHEM – Earlier national figurative mark ROCHEM MARINE – Relative ground for invalidity – Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark – Articles 15 and 57(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Articles 18 and 64(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-549/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 April 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0548_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Single Judge) of 26 April 2023.#Rochem Group AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark ROCHEM – Earlier national figurative mark ROCHEM MARINE – Relative ground for invalidity – Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark – Articles 15 and 57(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Articles 18 and 64(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-548/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 April 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0681_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 26 April 2023.#Ana Maria Alves Casas v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark mccosmetics NY – Earlier EU figurative mark MAC MAKE-UP ART COSMETICS – Relative grounds for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Detriment to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-681/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 April 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0548decided

Judgment of the General Court (Single Judge) of 26 April 2023.#Rochem Group AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark ROCHEM – Earlier national figurative mark ROCHEM MARINE – Relative ground for invalidity – Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark – Articles 15 and 57(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Articles 18 and 64(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-548/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 April 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0546decided

Judgment of the General Court (Single Judge) of 26 April 2023.#Rochem Group AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark R.T.S. ROCHEM Technical Services – Earlier national figurative mark ROCHEM MARINE – Relative ground for invalidity – Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark – Articles 15 and 57(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Articles 18 and 64(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-546/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 April 2023

PreviousPage 22 of 23Next