Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

351 records in EU in 2018

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778France · 494Germany · 293Austria · 202United States · 141Belgium · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0150decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 October 2018.#Asolo LTD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — European Union word mark FLÜGEL — Earlier national word marks …VERLEIHT FLÜGEL and RED BULL VERLEIHT FLÜÜÜGEL — Relative grounds for refusal — Extinction of rights due to acquiescence — Article 54(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 61(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Absence of likelihood of confusion — Absence of similarity between the goods — Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Article 8(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-150/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2018

Report· CCCELEX 62016CC0466decided

Opinion of Advocate General Mengozzi delivered on 3 October 2018.#Council of the European Union v Marquis Energy LLC.#Appeal – Dumping – Implementing Regulation (EU) No 157/2013 – Imports of bioethanol originating in the United States of America – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Country-wide dumping margin – Action for annulment – Non-exporting producer – Locus standi – Direct concern.#Case C-466/16 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 October 2018

Report· CCCELEX 62017CC0236decided

Opinion of Advocate General Tanchev delivered on 3 October 2018.#Canadian Solar Emea GmbH and Others v Council of the European Union.#Appeal — Dumping — Imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (cells) originating in or consigned from China — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 — Article 3(7) — Article 9(4) — Temporal scope of Regulation (EU) No 1168/2012.#Case C-236/17 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 October 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0186decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 October 2018.#Unipreus, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark wallapop — Prior national figurative mark wala w — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Similarity of the services.#Case T-186/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 October 2018

Report· CCCELEX 62016CC0465decided

Opinion of Advocate General Mengozzi delivered on 3 October 2018.#Council of the European Union v Growth Energy and Renewable Fuels Association.#Appeal – Dumping – Implementing Regulation (EU) No 157/2013 – Imports of bioethanol originating in the United States of America – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Country-wide dumping margin – Actions for annulment – Associations representing non-exporting producers and traders/blenders – Locus standi – Direct concern – Individual concern.#Case C-465/16 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 October 2018

Record· CJCELEX 62016CJ0207decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 October 2018.#Proceedings brought by Ministerio Fiscal.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Tarragona.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Electronic communications — Processing of personal data — Directive 2002/58/EC — Articles 1 and 3 — Scope — Confidentiality of electronic communications — Protection — Article 5 and Article 15(1) — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Articles 7 and 8 — Data processed in connection with the provision of electronic communications services — Access of national authorities to the data for the purposes of an investigation — Threshold of seriousness of an offence capable of justifying access to the data.#Case C-207/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 October 2018

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0073decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 October 2018.#French Republic v European Parliament.#Action for annulment — Institutional law — Protocol on the location of the seats of the institutions and of certain bodies, offices, agencies and departments of the European Union — European Parliament — Concept of ‘budget session’ held in Strasbourg (France) — Article 314 TFEU — Exercise of budgetary powers during an additional plenary part-session in Brussels (Belgium).#Case C-73/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 October 2018

Decision· DCELEX 32018D1486in force

Council Decision (EU) 2018/1486 of 28 September 2018 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Customs Sub-Committee established by the Association Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part, as regards the replacement of Protocol I to that Agreement, concerning the definition of the concept of ‘originating products’ and methods of administrative cooperation, by a new protocol which refers to the Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin

European Union · EUR-Lex · 28 September 2018

Decision· DCELEX 32018D1464in force

Council Decision (EU) 2018/1464 of 28 September 2018 on the position to be adopted on behalf of the European Union in the CETA Committee on Trade and Sustainable Development, established by the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between Canada, of the one part, and the European Union and its Member States, of the other part, as regards the establishment of lists of individuals willing to serve as panellists under Chapter Twenty-Three and Chapter Twenty-Four of the Agreement

European Union · EUR-Lex · 28 September 2018

Decision· DCELEX 32018D1609in force

Council Decision (EU) 2018/1609 of 28 September 2018 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) Working Party on Customs Questions affecting Transport and within the UNECE Inland Transport Committee concerning the adoption of the Convention on the facilitation of border crossing procedures for passengers, luggage and load-luggage carried in international traffic by rail

European Union · EUR-Lex · 28 September 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0116decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 September 2018.#Spiegel-Verlag Rudolf Augstein GmbH & Co. KG and Michael Sauga v European Central Bank.#Access to documents — Decision 2004/258/EC — Documents concerning the public debt and the budget deficit of an EU Member State — Refusal of access — Exceptions relating to the economic policy of the European Union and of a Member State.#Case T-116/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 September 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0219decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 September 2018.#M J Quinlan & Associates Pty Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Three-dimensional trade mark in the shape of a kangaroo — Declaration of revocation — Genuine use of the mark — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Proof of genuine use — Nature of use.#Case T-219/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 September 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0070decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 September 2018.#TenneT Holding BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark NorthSeaGrid — Earlier EU word and figurative marks nationalgrid — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-70/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 September 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0449decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 27 September 2018.#Sevenfriday AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark SEVENFRIDAY — Earlier EU word mark SEVEN — International registration designating the European Union — Earlier figurative mark 7SEVEN — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-449/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 September 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0825decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 September 2018.#Carbon System Verwaltungs GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark LIGHTBOUNCE — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-825/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 September 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0712decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 September 2018.#Christos Ntolas v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark GN Laboratories — Earlier EU word mark GNC — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-712/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 September 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0595decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 September 2018.#Demp BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for an EU trade mark consisting of a combination of the colours yellow and grey — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-595/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 September 2018

Record· COCELEX 62018CO0422decided

Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 27 September 2018.#FR v Ministero dell’interno - Commissione Territoriale per il riconoscimento della Protezione Internazionale presso la Prefettura U.T.G. di Milano.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Milano.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Area of freedom, security and justice — Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection — Directive 2013/32/EU — Article 46 — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 18, Article 19(2) and Article 47 — Right to an effective remedy — Decision rejecting an application for international protection — National legislation providing for a second level of jurisdiction — Automatic suspensory effect limited to the action at first instance.#Case C-422/18 PPU.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 September 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0472decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 September 2018.#Wilhelm Sihn jr. GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark Camele’on — Earlier international and national word marks CHAMELEON — Relative ground for refusal — No similarity — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-472/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 September 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62015TJ0288decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 27 September 2018.#Ahmed Abdelaziz Ezz and Others v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Egypt — Freezing of funds — Admissibility — Objectives — Criteria for inclusion of persons targeted — Renewal of designation of the applicants on the list of persons targeted — Factual basis — Plea of illegality — Legal basis — Proportionality — Right to fair trial — Presumption of innocence — Right to good administration — Error of law — Manifest error of assessment — Right to property — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-288/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 September 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0062decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 26 September 2018.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark PUMA — Earlier international figurative trade marks PUMA — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-62/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 September 2018

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0175decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 26 September 2018.#X v Belastingdienst/Toeslagen.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common policy on asylum and subsidiary protection — Directive 2005/85/EC — Article 39 — Directive 2008/115/EC — Article 13 — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 18, Article 19(2) and Article 47 — Right to an effective remedy — Principle of non-refoulement — Decision rejecting an application for asylum and imposing an obligation to return — National legislation providing for a second level of jurisdiction — Automatic suspensory effect limited to the action at first instance.#Case C-175/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 September 2018

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0180decided

Arrest van het Hof (Vierde kamer) van 26 september 2018.#X en Y tegen Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie.#Prejudiciële verwijzing – Gemeenschappelijk beleid inzake asiel en subsidiaire bescherming – Richtlijn 2013/32/EU – Artikel 46 – Richtlijn 2008/115/EG – Artikel 13 – Handvest van de grondrechten van de Europese Unie – Artikel 18, artikel 19, lid 2, en artikel 47 – Recht op een doeltreffende voorziening in rechte – Beginsel van non-refoulement – Besluit tot afwijzing van een verzoek om internationale bescherming en tot oplegging van een terugkeerverplichting – Nationale regeling die voorziet in rechtspraak in tweede aanleg – Schorsende werking van rechtswege die tot het beroep in eerste aanleg is beperkt.#Zaak C-180/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 September 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0180decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 25 September 2018.#EM Research Organization, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark ‘EM’ — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Evidence produced for the first time before the General Court.#Case T-180/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 September 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0238decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 September 2018.#Alexander Gugler v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark GUGLER — Earlier national company name Gugler France — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Likelihood of confusion.#Case T-238/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 September 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0435decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 September 2018.#Grendene, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark HIPANEMA — Earlier figurative EU and national trade marks Ipanema and iPANEMA — Relative ground for refusal — No similarity between the goods — Aesthetically complementary nature — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-435/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 September 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0328decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 25 September 2018.#Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark BBQLOUMI — Prior EU collective word mark HALLOUMI — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Rejection of the opposition — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-328/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 September 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0182decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 25 September 2018.#Novartis AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark AKANTO — Earlier EU word mark KANTOS — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-182/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 September 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0384decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 25 September 2018.#Republic of Cyprus v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark BBQLOUMI — Prior United Kingdom word certification mark HALLOUMI — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Rejection of the opposition — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-384/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 September 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0488decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 September 2018.#Ghost - Corporate Management SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark Dry Zone — Period for bringing an action — Lateness — Inadmissibility of the appeal brought before the Board of Appeal — Article 60 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 68 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — No force majeure or unforeseeable circumstances — Obligations of care and diligence — Legitimate expectations.#Case T-488/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 September 2018

Report· CCCELEX 62017CC0497decided

Opinion of Advocate General Wahl delivered on 20 September 2018.#Oeuvre d’assistance aux bêtes d’abattoirs (OABA) v Ministre de l'Agriculture et de l'Alimentation and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d'appel de Versailles.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 13 TFEU — Animal welfare — Regulation (EC) No 1099/2009 — Protection of animals at the time of killing — Particular methods of slaughter prescribed by religious rites — Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 — Articles 3 and 14(1)(b)(viii) — Compatibility with organic production — Regulation (EC) No 889/2008 — First paragraph of Article 57 — Organic production logo of the European Union.#Case C-497/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 September 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0668decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 20 September 2018.#Maico Holding GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark Eico — Earlier EU word mark MAICO — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-668/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 September 2018

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0518decided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 20 September 2018.#Stefan Rudigier.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Public passenger transport services by rail and by road — Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 — Article 5(1) — Award of public service contracts — Article 7(2) — Obligation to publish certain information in the Official Journal of the European Union at least one year before the launch of the procedure — Consequences of non-publication — Annulment of the call for tenders — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 27(1) — Article 47(1) — Directive 2014/25/EU — Article 45(1) — Article 66(1) — Contract notice.#Case C-518/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 September 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0266decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 20 September 2018.#Kwizda Holding GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark UROAKUT — Earlier national and international figurative marks UroCys — Relative grounds for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Power to alter decisions — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-266/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 September 2018

Report· CCCELEX 62017CC0313decided

Opinion of Advocate General Mengozzi delivered on 20 September 2018.#George Haswani v Council of the European Union.#Appeal — Article 86 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Admissibility — Procedure for modifying the application — Need to modify the pleas in law and arguments — Restrictive measures adopted against the Syrian Arab Republic — List of persons subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion of the applicant’s name.#Case C-313/17 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 September 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0623decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 September 2018.#Volkswagen AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark MAIN AUTO WHEELS — Earlier EU figurative marks VW — Absolute ground for refusal — No similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Obligation to state reasons — First sentence of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now first sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-623/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 September 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0652decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 September 2018.#Eddy's Snack Company GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark Eddy’s Snackcompany — Earlier national word mark TEDDY — Relative ground for refusal — Principle of ne ultra petita — Article 76(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) No 2017/1001) — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-652/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 September 2018

PreviousPage 7 of 8Next